Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Hier klicken Jetzt informieren PR CR0917 Cloud Drive Photos Learn More Mehr dazu Hier klicken HI_PROJECT Mehr dazu Hier Klicken Jetzt bestellen AmazonMusicUnlimitedEcho BundesligaLive longss17


4,4 von 5 Sternen
4,4 von 5 Sternen
Who Owns The Future?
Format: Gebundene Ausgabe|Ändern

am 29. Mai 2013
*A full executive summary of this book will be available at newbooksinbrief dot com, on or before Tuesday, June 4, 2013.

The main argument: Not so long ago the Internet was seen as the next great economic engine. The optimism was never higher than at the peak of the dot-com boom in the late 1990s, of course; but even after the dot-com bust in the early 2000s, many believed that this was but the growing pains of an emerging industry, and that in the long run the Internet would yet provide the foundation for a new and improved information economy.

Since that time, it is certainly the case that the Internet has spawned a few major successes (such as Google, Amazon, eBay and now Facebook), as well as a host of hopefuls (such as Twitter, Kickstarter, Pinterest and Instagram). However, it cannot be said that the economy has enjoyed a great boost since the Internet exploded. On the contrary, the economy has, at best, stagnated—and it currently shows no signs of escaping its slump. So what went wrong?

According to Silicon Valley luminary Jarion Lanier, the problem is not so much with the Internet per se, but with how it has been set up, and how the major Internet companies themselves are organized. To begin with, major Internet companies tend to form monopolies, or near-monopolies, and on a global scale (mainly because Internet networks are able to reach a global audience and undercut local players, but also because these networks are more valuable to their users as they grow larger [for instance, it is most convenient to just join Facebook to connect with friends because this is the platform that most people, for whatever reason, have come to use—it just simplifies things]). The formation of monopolies and near monopolies destroys competition, of course, which compromises economic growth.

Even more important than this, though, is that Internet megaliths employ relatively few people, and have very little overhead (thus they simply don’t contribute much back to the economy). You see, the business plan of most successful Internet companies is to offer a particular service for free (such as Internet search efficiency with Google, or social connecting with Facebook, or business connecting with LinkedIn, or an auction platform with eBay, or music and video files on a sharing site etc). The framework of the platform is provided by the company, but the content of the service is provided by the users (indexable websites on Google, Facebook pages on Facebook, LinkedIn profiles on LinkedIn, auction items on eBay, and music and video files on sharing sites). The site attracts users with the prospect of a free and useful service, and the site itself makes revenue through selling advertising space. Oftentimes, the company collects information from its users through its activities on the platform, and uses this information to help target them with ads and/or sells this information to third parties so these third parties can use it themselves. (Lanier calls companies that operate in this way Siren Servers.) [This very website, it will be noticed, is a cog in this set up.]

As we can see, then, a big part of the value of these Internet companies comes from their users’ information, and the content providers whose material is being shared no end. Now, if these users and content providers were being paid fairly for their contributions (according to how much value they brought to the Internet companies), we could surely expect a major economic boost as a result. Instead, the users and content providers are paid nothing for their contributions (or at most a fraction of what their contributions represent). The end result of this is that wealth is concentrated at the top—in the hands of the major Internet companies—and the economy as a whole suffers (since few jobs are created to allow the wealth to trickle down).

And that’s just the beginning. The fact is that more and more things are being digitized as we move forward (for instance, driving is being digitized through driverless cars, education lessons are being digitized through being recorded on digital equipment, and even physical objects are being digitized through 3D printing). As things become digitized they become capable of being shared over the Internet for next to nothing. This will inevitably mean the further erosion of productive jobs (and whole industries—such as has already occurred in the music and video industries).

Ultimately, the only wealth-generating endeavor left will be the Internet platforms that share all of this information. Of course, with nothing productive left to advertise, their revenues will fall off as well, so even they won’t be making any money. For Lanier, this is the fate we can expect unless we change the game we are currently playing.

The long short of it is that we must find a way to pay people adequately for the information they contribute. Lanier argues this means reorganizing the Internet in such a way that informational transactions are monetized—such that the users of information are charged and the providers are paid for each transaction. It is not going to be easy to reorganize the Internet in this way–not only technically but also because we have all become accustomed to using the Internet the way it is (and we like getting things for ‘free’).

Ultimately, though, we will have no choice, for our current course is leading us to an economy that is dominated by wealth at the top—and eventually no wealth for anyone. At some point, this state of affairs must lead to a revolt and/or a complete breakdown.

Lanier’s book is a sprawling affair occasioned with numerous fairly bizarre flights of fancy (I didn’t mind this so much since Lanier is fairly interesting, and has a unique perspective), but the core ideas here are very intriguing and worthy of serious consideration. The problem with Lanier’s solution at this point is that the economy has not yet slumped enough in order to convince us that Lanier’s theory must be true, and that radical solutions are needed (and Lanier’s solution is radical). Nevertheless, should events continue to play out as Lanier foresees, his solution may well become attractive at some point. A full executive summary of the book will be available at newbooksinbrief dot com on or before Tuesday, June 4; a podcast discussion of the book will be available shortly thereafter.
0Kommentar| 9 Personen fanden diese Informationen hilfreich. War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich?JaNeinMissbrauch melden
am 5. Februar 2015
...wenn es um die Themen Big Data, Datensicherheit, Social Media geht. Man kann vom Auftreten von Jaron Lanier halten was man will, das Buch liefert definitiv interessante Denkanstöße.
0Kommentar| 2 Personen fanden diese Informationen hilfreich. War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich?JaNeinMissbrauch melden
am 3. März 2016
Too bad nobody's listening to what Lanier's has to say. He has a very clear vision of what's the sharing economy and why all that's unsustainable in the long term. Unfortunately a single book and a single vision can't change the game of powers of an entire industry. Must read for people working in Tech.
0Kommentar| Eine Person fand diese Informationen hilfreich. War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich?JaNeinMissbrauch melden
am 7. Januar 2015
Lanier hat den Friedensnobelpreis des Deutschen Buchhandels bekommen. Ich habe seine Rede zur Verleihung gesehen (war auch überrascht, dass diese auf ARD übertragen wurde) und habe mir daraufhin das Buch gekauft - in Englisch, da es nur halb so viel kostet wie die deutsche Version.

Er trifft mit seinem Buch den Nerv der Zeit.
Die Generation kostenlos (Ideal-Beispiel: Facebook) bezahlt man mit dem Preis der eigenen Daten.
Dass das auf Dauer nicht gut gehen wird, sollte jedem normalgebildetem Internetbürger einleuchten und jeden Internetneuling mit dem Buch klar werden.

Allerdings ist Laniers Universallösung "Für alles muss gezahlt werden" in meinen Augen nicht der Weg zum Ziel.
Aber anscheinend für den Deutschen Buchhandel, weshalb auch klar wird, wieso Lanier dessen Friedensnobelpreis bekommen hat.

Es ist ein Buch, mit dem man sich differenziert auseinandersetzen muss. Lesen ja, aber äußerst kritisch darüber nachdenken.
Und zu dem Fazit kommen: Die aktuelle Internetsituation hat keine Zukunft, Laniers Ideen aber auch nicht.
11 Kommentar| 2 Personen fanden diese Informationen hilfreich. War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich?JaNeinMissbrauch melden
am 3. August 2014
Wer gut in englisch ist, kann hier im Hinblick auf die "Umsonst" Kultur des Internets viel dazulernen.
Allerdings braucht man gute Nerven um die Konsequenzen zu verkraften
0Kommentar| 4 Personen fanden diese Informationen hilfreich. War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich?JaNeinMissbrauch melden
am 24. September 2015
The future is coming, it belongs to us! This book gives some insight into the world of internet algorithms and motives of big companies.
0Kommentar|War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich?JaNeinMissbrauch melden
am 8. Juli 2013
'd like to mention first that since I grew up with computers I like to read real books, which in this case is in good condition (no stinking paper, font big enough, good binding). The content is also not bad, although I don't see any real solution to change the digital development like it is. The future seems to be predetermined by the monopolies who control big data of little you and me. And we still try to get a piece of pie in the form of coupons and nano-payments, which make us to modern slaves and that‘s how I feel.
0Kommentar| 7 Personen fanden diese Informationen hilfreich. War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich?JaNeinMissbrauch melden
am 20. Juli 2013
Interessanter und durchaus realistischer Ausblick auf die nächsten Jahre in punkto Arbeitswelten. Für jeden, der am Puls der Zeit bleiben will auf jeden Fall zu empfehlen.
0Kommentar| Eine Person fand diese Informationen hilfreich. War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich?JaNeinMissbrauch melden