Hier klicken Sale Salew Salem Hier klicken Jetzt informieren Book Spring Store 2017 Cloud Drive Photos Learn More TDZ Hier klicken Mehr dazu Mehr dazu Shop Kindle PrimeMusic longss17

  • S.
  • Kundenrezensionen



Derzeit tritt ein Problem beim Filtern der Rezensionen auf. Bitte versuchen Sie es später noch einmal.

am 21. März 2000
I was very impressed by Updike's ability to create characters that are wholly believable, and to craft a story that is hard to put down -- I read this in a couple of days, and enjoyed it. The protagonist, Sarah, sounds very much like any number of people I've met, down to the fine details -- a difficult stunt to sustain over the length of a novel that is essentially her dictation. And, to be sure, the book is funny, as many have claimed. It is also rather mean spirited, however.
Sarah leaves her husband for a "spiritual" commune or ashram, which Updike modeled on the one established in the 70's by Bhagavan Shri Rajneesh in Oregon. Having lived in a community that bears much similarlity to the one portrayed, I can vouche for the accuracy (greatly exaggerated, of course) of the likeness. But although my own experience was no less disappointing than Sarah's, I would have liked to have thought that a writer of Updike's ability and insight would not stoop to getting the usual belly laughs at the expense of all those who have tried to find spiritual growth through Eastern traditions. He seems to have steeped himself deeply in the language and philosophy of Buddhism and Hinduism, but only to lampoon those who are drawn to them. His portrayal is clever, and certainly captures the worst aspects of such endeavors, but it veers towards the most cynical view imaginable -- that those who pursue such traditions and lifestyles are viciously greedy, self-indulgent frauds, and those who steer clear of them to pursue the stock market or whatever are far wiser souls. If you want to wallow in that perspective, this book's for you.
Updike's portrayal of Sarah herself is similarly tainted. She is ultimately revealed as selfish, petty, and grotesquely hypocritical, using her "feminism" as a means to express all her worst qualities. Of course, there's no reason not to have such a character in a novel, but I got the impression that this was Updike's view, if not of all women, than at least of women of a privileged background, or women who leave their husbands but aren't willing to impoverish themselves in the process, or who look for salvation in offbeat ways. (And I'm not any of the above.)
In short, S. is a cheap shot at feminism and all things "new age," but an entertaining one.
0Kommentar| 3 Personen fanden diese Informationen hilfreich. War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich?JaNeinMissbrauch melden
am 22. Juni 1998
I thought Updike really captured the stream-of-consciousness way of speaking of a lot of women (my mom has this tendency). It was hilarious to read about this woman leaving behind all the trivia of everyday life in favor of spiritual enlightenment but still clinging tight to her old world. This was a really good book. Great plot twist at the end.
0Kommentar| Eine Person fand diese Informationen hilfreich. War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich?JaNeinMissbrauch melden
am 25. Februar 1998
John Updike does an excellent job changing his style from dark to light with dark undetones in this book. It was so incredibly funny that I laughed out loud while reading it. It is a quick read with some good insights into changing your life for better or worse.
0Kommentar| Eine Person fand diese Informationen hilfreich. War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich?JaNeinMissbrauch melden
am 15. August 2002
... ist dieser Briefroman von John Updike. Sarah läßt uns in ihre Gedankenwelt einschauen, die noch mehr in der Welt "draußen" zu sein scheint, als sie es dem Leser glaubhaft machen möchte. Das Buch endet mit einigen unerwarteten Entdeckungen und einem überraschenden Ende.
0Kommentar|War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich?JaNeinMissbrauch melden
am 15. Dezember 1997
"S." is a story told through letters about a woman who leaves her husband and runs off to follow an Indian guru. I thought this would be a great book since I love Updike and thought the premise for the book was hysterical. However, it was like reading the journal of a boring, neglected middle aged woman who loves to ramble about nothing at all. Try "Couples" or "Witches of Eastwick" instead to see what greatness Updike is really capable of.
0Kommentar|War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich?JaNeinMissbrauch melden
am 27. Juli 1998
S is the worst book I've ever read by a great writer. Updike clearly was out of his area of expertise/insightful knowledge on this one.
0Kommentar|War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich?JaNeinMissbrauch melden

Brauchen Sie weitere HilfeHier klicken