Neu:
18,00€18,00€
Lieferung für 4€ 8. - 14. Januar. Details
Kommt nach Weihnachten an.
Benötigen Sie früher ein Geschenk? Amazon Geschenkgutscheine sind sofort per
E-Mail oder
SMS verfügbar.
Gewöhnlich versandfertig in 3 bis 4 Tagen
Versand
BooksParadiseGlobal
Verkäufer
Rückgaben
Rückgabefrist: bis 31. Januar 2025
Zahlung
Sichere Transaktion
Mit „Gebraucht – Sehr gut“ sparen
16,35€16,35€
GRATIS Lieferung 15. - 23. Januar
Versand durch: ThriftBooks-Chicago USA Verkauft von: ThriftBooks-Chicago USA
Lade die kostenlose Kindle-App herunter und lese deine Kindle-Bücher sofort auf deinem Smartphone, Tablet oder Computer – kein Kindle-Gerät erforderlich.
Mit Kindle für Web kannst du sofort in deinem Browser lesen.
Scanne den folgenden Code mit deiner Mobiltelefonkamera und lade die Kindle-App herunter.
Bild nicht verfügbar
Farbe:
-
-
-
- Herunterladen, um dieses Videos wiederzugeben Flash Player
Dem Autor folgen
OK
Fight of the Century: Writers Reflect on 100 Years of Landmark ACLU Cases Gebundene Ausgabe – 21. Januar 2020
Kaufoptionen und Plus-Produkte
On January 19, 1920, a small group of idealists and visionaries, including Helen Keller, Jane Addams, Roger Baldwin, and Crystal Eastman, founded the American Civil Liberties Union. A century after its creation, the ACLU remains the nation’s premier defender of the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution.
In collaboration with the ACLU, authors Michael Chabon and Ayelet Waldman have curated an anthology of essays about landmark cases in the organization’s one-hundred-year history. Fight of the Century takes you inside the trials and the stories that have shaped modern life. Some of the most prominent cases that the ACLU has been involved in—Brown v. Board of Education, Roe v. Wade, Miranda v. Arizona—need little introduction. Others you may never even have heard of, yet their outcomes quietly defined the world we live in now. Familiar or little-known, each case springs to vivid life in the hands of the acclaimed writers who dive into the history, narrate their personal experiences, and debate the questions at the heart of each issue.
Hector Tobar introduces us to Ernesto Miranda, the felon whose wrongful conviction inspired the now-iconic Miranda rights—which the police would later read to the man suspected of killing him. Yaa Gyasi confronts the legacy of Brown v. Board of Education, in which the ACLU submitted a friend of- the-court brief questioning why a nation that has sent men to the moon still has public schools so unequal that they may as well be on different planets. True to the ACLU’s spirit of principled dissent, Scott Turow offers a blistering critique of the ACLU’s stance on campaign finance.
These powerful stories, along with essays from Neil Gaiman, Meg Wolitzer, Salman Rushdie, Ann Patchett, Viet Thanh Nguyen, Louise Erdrich, George Saunders, and many more, remind us that the issues the ACLU has engaged over the past one hundred years remain as vital as ever today, and that we can never take our liberties for granted.
Chabon and Waldman are donating their advance to the ACLU and the contributors are forgoing payment.
- Seitenzahl der Print-Ausgabe336 Seiten
- SpracheEnglisch
- HerausgeberAvid Reader Press / Simon & Schuster
- Erscheinungstermin21. Januar 2020
- Abmessungen15.24 x 2.54 x 22.86 cm
- ISBN-101501190407
- ISBN-13978-1501190407
Sicherheits- und Produktressourcen
Problem beim Laden der Informationen
- Bilder zur ProduktsicherheitHerstellerinformationenVerantwortliche Person für die EU
Problem beim Laden der Informationen
Problem beim Laden der Informationen
Problem beim Laden der Informationen
Produktbeschreibungen
Pressestimmen
"Forceful, beautifully written and often humorous . . . The essays in Fight of the Century may be brief, but each packs a mighty wallop. . . . This is a book to read, share and keep." —Associated Press
"Full of struggle, emotion, fear, resilience, hope, and triumph." —Los Angeles Review of Books
“Moving . . . Entertaining . . . It’s enlightening to watch some of our most masterly literary portraitists restore the warts and wardrobes, the motivations and machinations to those whose stories have been stripped down to surnames or pseudonyms.”
—Monica Youn, New York Times Book Review
"Vigorous, informative, and well-organized, this outstanding collection befits the ACLU’s substantial impact on American law and society."
—Publishers Weekly (starred review)
"A stunning collection of original and topical essays . . . [that] vividly brings consequential court cases to life."
—Booklist (starred review)
"A finely edited almanac of lively, contextually grounded stories that read like the greatest hits of freedom . . . Provides insights that are both riveting and refreshingly diverse."
—Kirkus Reviews
Über den Autor und weitere Mitwirkende
Dave Eggers is the bestselling author of seven books, including A Hologram for the King, a finalist for the National Book Award; Zeitoun, winner of the American Book Award and Dayton Literary Peace Prize; and What Is the What, which was a finalist for the National Book CriticsCircle Award and won France’s Prix Medici. That book, about ValentinoAchak Deng, a survivor of the civil war in Sudan, gave birth to the Valentino Achak Deng Foundation, which operates a secondary school in South Sudan run by Mr. Deng. Eggers is the founder and editor of McSweeney’s, an independent publishing house based in San Francisco that produces a quarterly journal, a monthly magazine, The Believer:, aquarterly DVD of short films and documentaries, Wholphin; and anoral history series, Voice of Witness. In 2002, with Nínive Calegari he cofounded 826 Valencia, a nonprofit writing and tutoring center for youth in the Mission District of San Francisco. Local communities have since opened sister 826 centers in Chicago, Los Angeles, New York, Ann Arbor, Seattle, Boston, and Washington, D.C. Eggers is also the founder of ScholarMatch, a program that matches donors with students needing funds for college tuition. A native of Chicago, Eggers now lives in Northern California with his wife and two children.
Meg Wolitzer’s novels include The Female Persuasion; Sleepwalking; This Is Your Life; Surrender, Dorothy; and The Position. She lives in New York City.
Moriel Rothman-Zecher is an Israeli-American novelist and poet. He is a 2018 National Book Foundation “5 Under 35” honoree and received a 2017 MacDowell Colony Fellowship for Literature. His writing has been published in TheNew York Times, The Paris Review’s “The Daily,” Haaretz, and elsewhere. He lives in Yellow Springs, Ohio, with his wife, Kayla, and daughter, Nahar. Read more at TheLefternWall.com and follow him on Twitter @Moriel_RZ.
Jennifer Egan is the author of six previous books of fiction: Manhattan Beach, winner of the Andrew Carnegie Medal for Excellence in Fiction; A Visit from the Goon Squad, which won the Pulitzer Prize and the National Book Critics Circle Award; The Keep; the story collection Emerald City; Look at Me, a National Book Award Finalist; and The Invisible Circus. Her work has appeared in The New Yorker, Harper’s Magazine, Granta, McSweeney’s, and The New York Times Magazine. Her website is JenniferEgan.com.
Produktinformation
- Herausgeber : Avid Reader Press / Simon & Schuster (21. Januar 2020)
- Sprache : Englisch
- Gebundene Ausgabe : 336 Seiten
- ISBN-10 : 1501190407
- ISBN-13 : 978-1501190407
- Abmessungen : 15.24 x 2.54 x 22.86 cm
- Kundenrezensionen:
Informationen zum Autor

Entdecke weitere Bücher des Autors, sehe ähnliche Autoren, lese Buchempfehlungen und vieles mehr.
Kundenrezensionen
- 5 Sterne4 Sterne3 Sterne2 Sterne1 Stern5 Sterne72%16%8%2%2%72%
- 5 Sterne4 Sterne3 Sterne2 Sterne1 Stern4 Sterne72%16%8%2%2%16%
- 5 Sterne4 Sterne3 Sterne2 Sterne1 Stern3 Sterne72%16%8%2%2%8%
- 5 Sterne4 Sterne3 Sterne2 Sterne1 Stern2 Sterne72%16%8%2%2%2%
- 5 Sterne4 Sterne3 Sterne2 Sterne1 Stern1 Stern72%16%8%2%2%2%
Kundenbewertungen, einschließlich Produkt-Sternebewertungen, helfen Kunden, mehr über das Produkt zu erfahren und zu entscheiden, ob es das richtige Produkt für sie ist.
Um die Gesamtbewertung der Sterne und die prozentuale Aufschlüsselung nach Sternen zu berechnen, verwenden wir keinen einfachen Durchschnitt. Stattdessen berücksichtigt unser System beispielsweise, wie aktuell eine Bewertung ist und ob der Prüfer den Artikel bei Amazon gekauft hat. Es wurden auch Bewertungen analysiert, um die Vertrauenswürdigkeit zu überprüfen.
Erfahren Sie mehr darüber, wie Kundenbewertungen bei Amazon funktionieren.Spitzenrezensionen aus anderen Ländern
-
Amazon CustomerBewertet in den USA am5. Juli 20245,0 von 5 Sternen Everyone should read this
A great historical review of rights we've won in America and a reminder of those we still need to fight for. I am free only if everyone else is free too. Live and let live.
-
RDDBewertet in den USA am12. Februar 20205,0 von 5 Sternen A Primer for Anyone Studying Civil Liberties!
In their introduction, editors Michael Chabon and Ayelet Waldman write, “To understand the vital role that the ACLU plays in American society requires a nuanced understanding of the absolute value of freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, freedom from unwanted search and seizure, of the right to due process and equal justice under the law, even – again, especially – when those rights protect people we find abhorrent or speech that offends us” (pg. xv). The book itself covers forty different cases presented in chronological order, from “Stromberg v. California” (1931) through “ACLU v. United States Department of Defense, et al”. (2018). Some authors, like Jacqueline Woodson on “Powell v. Alabama” (1932) and “Patterson v. Alabama” (1935) or Neil Gaiman on “Reno v. ACLU” (1997) and “Ashcroft v. ACLU” (2004), examine similar cases to show how rulings changed, were refined, or upheld. What emerges is a careful study of jurisprudence in defense of civil liberties over the last century. “Fight of the Century” is a necessary primer for anyone studying civil liberties.
-
sue gBewertet in den USA am4. September 20204,0 von 5 Sternen ACLU stories
Stories and personal reflections on key Supreme Court cases that the American Civil Liberties Union took part and filed briefs on. Not all the authors agreed with the position taken by the ACLU but they all saw the value of the ACLU in standing up for the civil liberties against an overzealous government or policy. Forty stories, personal reflections about how the Supreme Court case impacted their lives even if they were not alive at the time the case was decided.
-
SusanBewertet in den USA am14. Januar 20225,0 von 5 Sternen This is a great book.
All sorts of authors write reflections on about 50 significant US Supreme Court cases. Well written and understandable to non lawyers.
-
Mike watkins Jr.Bewertet in den USA am23. März 20203,0 von 5 Sternen 3.5 out of 5. Unique takes on various ACLU cases.
Pros:
1. The format is similar to "The End of Hunger" in that there are multiple writers rather than one. But what I like about this book is that unlike "The End of Hunger" it's very organized. Each writer gets a separate case they comment on and each case leads to the next case until we get to a present Pipeline Case that the ACLU is currently working on.
2. I like how there is such a variety in regards to the approach/style each writer chooses to take when analyzing their selected case. Some were personally involved/impacted with the case in some way so they tell their story, others get into the legal jargon (was great reading the "lawyer writers" who did this), others describe how one case impacts society as a whole, etc.
2A. These different styles stem from the fact that figures of a variety of fields were selected in a way. Sure all of them were writers but writers from different genres and some were/are lawyers, musicians, and filmmakers as well.
3. I like how A big-time lawyer and author in this book were allowed to argue against the ACLU for a particular case. I feel like his section showcased that the ACLU, like any other organization if you "look beyond the veal" is composed of fallible human beings that are capable of making wrong decisions.
Cons:
1. I felt like some of the writers "flexed too much" or they tried to place as many big words as they could into one sentence just for the heck of it and you could tell.
1A. Some writers well..... "flexed too little" lol like they would just literally describe the case and what led up to the case and that's it like you could basically google the insight they provided, or maybe they googled, yourself.
2. The book needed more writers that are also lawyers and/or legal scholars. Don't get me wrong I enjoyed the historical insight and storytelling but certain cases needed individuals to dig up extra details and legal professionals are the best for that kind of thing.
3. Certain sections were way too long and I found myself reading half of those and skipping half of them. Additionally, in certain sections writers were either too biased (liberal) and/or failed to showcase why a particular narrowly applicable case should matter to me and what I should get from it personally so I skipped some of those sections in their entirety after a few pages in.