972 m | Nürnberg 90431
Lade die kostenlose Kindle-App herunter und lese deine Kindle-Bücher sofort auf deinem Smartphone, Tablet oder Computer – kein Kindle-Gerät erforderlich.
Mit Kindle für Web kannst du sofort in deinem Browser lesen.
Scanne den folgenden Code mit deiner Mobiltelefonkamera und lade die Kindle-App herunter.
Bild nicht verfügbar
Farbe:
-
-
-
- Herunterladen, um dieses Videos wiederzugeben Flash Player
Dem Autor folgen
OK
The Book of Daniel: A Novel Taschenbuch – 10. Juli 2007
Kaufoptionen und Plus-Produkte
His name is Daniel Isaacson, and as the story opens, his parents have been dead for many years. He has had a long time to adjust to their deaths. He has not adjusted.
Out of the shambles of his childhood, he has constructed a new life—marriage to an adoring girl who gives him a son of his own, and a career in scholarship. It is a life that enrages him.
In the silence of the library at Columbia University, where he is supposedly writing a Ph.D. dissertation, Daniel composes something quite different.
It is a confession of his most intimate relationships—with his wife, his foster parents, and his kid sister Susan, whose own radicalism so reproaches him.
It is a book of memories: riding a bus with his parents to the ill-fated Paul Robeson concert in Peekskill; watching the FBI take his father away; appearing with Susan at rallies protesting their parents’ innocence; visiting his mother and father in the Death House.
It is a book of investigation: transcribing Daniel’s interviews with people who knew his parents, or who knew about them; and logging his strange researches and discoveries in the library stacks.
It is a book of judgments of everyone involved in the case—lawyers, police, informers, friends, and the Isaacson family itself.
It is a book rich in characters, from elderly grand- mothers of immigrant culture, to covert radicals of the McCarthy era, to hippie marchers on the Pen-tagon. It is a book that spans the quarter-century of American life since World War II. It is a book about the nature of Left politics in this country—its sacrificial rites, its peculiar cruelties, its humility, its bitterness. It is a book about some of the beautiful and terrible feelings of childhood. It is about the nature of guilt and innocence, and about the relations of people to nations.
It is The Book of Daniel.
- Seitenzahl der Print-Ausgabe319 Seiten
- SpracheEnglisch
- Erscheinungstermin10. Juli 2007
- Abmessungen13.18 x 1.83 x 20.32 cm
- ISBN-10081297817X
- ISBN-13978-0812978179
Sicherheits- und Produktressourcen
Problem beim Laden der Informationen
- Bilder zur ProduktsicherheitHerstellerinformationenVerantwortliche Person für die EU
Problem beim Laden der Informationen
Problem beim Laden der Informationen
Problem beim Laden der Informationen
Produktbeschreibungen
Pressestimmen
–Newsweek
“A nearly perfect work of art, and art on this level can only be a cause for rejoicing.”
–Joyce Carol Oates
“This is an extraordinary contemporary novel, a stunning work.”
–San Francisco Chronicle
“The political novel of our age . . . the best work of its kind.”
–New Republic
“Remarkable . . . One of the finest works of fiction.”
–Minneapolis Star Tribune
“Stirring, brilliant, very moving.”
–Houston Post
Über den Autor und weitere Mitwirkende
Leseprobe. Abdruck erfolgt mit freundlicher Genehmigung der Rechteinhaber. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.
Daniel Lewin thumbed his way from New York to Worcester, Mass., in just under five hours. With him was his young wife, Phyllis, and their eight-month-old son, Paul, whom Daniel carried in a sling chair strapped to his shoulders like a pack. The day was hot and overcast with the threat of rain, and the early morning traffic was wondering—I mean the early morning traffic was light, but not many drivers could pass them without wondering who they were and where they were going.
This is a Thinline felt tip marker, black. This is Composition Notebook 79C made in U.S.A. by Long Island Paper Products, Inc. This is Daniel trying one of the dark coves of the Browsing Room. Books for browsing are on the shelves. I sit at a table with a floor lamp at my shoulder. Outside this paneled room with its book-lined alcoves is the Periodical Room. The Periodical Room is filled with newspapers on sticks, magazines from round the world, and the droppings of learned societies. Down the hall is the Main Reading Room and the entrance to the stacks. On the floors above are the special collections of the various school libraries including the Library School Library. Downstairs there is even a branch of the Public Library. I feel encouraged to go on.
Daniel, a tall young man of twenty-five, wore his curly hair long. Steel-rimmed spectacles and a full mustache, brown, like his hair, made him look if not older than he was then more self-possessed and opinionated. Let’s face it, he looked cool, deliberately cool. In fact nothing about his appearance was accidental. If he’d lived in the nineteen thirties and came on this way he would be a young commie. A cafeteria commie. He was dressed in a blue prison jacket and dungarees. His Brooklyn-born wife was nineteen, with long straight natural blond hair worn this day in braids. She came to his shoulder. She wore flower bellbottoms and a khaki rain poncho and carried a small bag with things for the baby. As a matter of principle she liked to talk to strangers and make them unafraid, and although Daniel hadn’t wanted her to come along, he was glad he relented. The rides came quickly. She talked for him while he stared out the window. Cars, he noticed, were very big and wide and soft. The people who drove them were not fearful but patronizing. They were inquisitive and obviously entertained to be driving these young American kids who probably smoked marijuana even though they had a baby.
At about one o’clock they were let off at Route 9 in Worcester, a mile or so from their destination. They were looking up a long steep hill. At the crest of the hill, too far away to see, were the gates of Worcester State Hospital. Daniel had never been here but his father’s directions were precise. Daniel’s father was a law professor at Boston College forty miles to the east.
He didn’t like my marrying Phyllis, neither did my mother, but of course they wouldn’t say anything. Enlightened liberals are like that. Phyllis, a freshman dropout, has nothing for them. Liberals are like that too. They confuse character with education. They don’t believe we’ll live to be beautiful old people with strength in one another. Perhaps they sniff the strong erotic content of my marriage and find it distasteful. Phyllis is the kind of awkward girl with heavy thighs and heavy tits and slim lovely face whose ancestral mothers must have been bred in harems. The kind of unathletic helpless breeder to appeal to caliphs. The kind of sand dune that was made to be kicked around. Perhaps they are afraid I kick her around.
Daniel considered taking a city bus to the top of the hill but the traffic was bumper to bumper and they could almost outpace it by walking. With Phyllis beside him, her hand lightly on his arm, and with his thumbs hooked under the chest straps of the baby rig, he trudged up the hill. The road was jammed in both directions, and a blue haze of exhaust drifted through the heavy air. Daniel imagined it curling around his ankles, his waist, and finally his throat. A stone wall ran beside them separating the sidewalk from the hospital grounds. On the downhill side of the street were gas stations, dry cleaning drive-ins, car washes, package stores, pizza parlors. American flags were everywhere.
As they approached the top of the hill, they saw a stone kiosk in which a number of people waited for the bus. A bus arrived. It discharged its passengers, closed its doors with a hiss, and disappeared over the crest of the hill. Not one of the people waiting at the bus stop had attempted to board. One woman wore a sweater that was too small, a long loose skirt, white sweat socks and house slippers. One man was in his undershirt. Another man wore shoes with the toes cut out, a soiled blue serge jacket and brown pants. There was something wrong with these people. They made faces. A mouth smiled at nothing, and unsmiled, smiled and unsmiled. A head shook in vehement denial. Most of them carried brown paper bags rolled tight against their stomachs. They seemed to hold their life in those bags. Daniel took Phyllis’ arm. As they reached the bus stop the weird people dispersed and flowed around them like pigeons scuttling out of their way, flowing around them and reforming behind them, stirring restlessly in the kiosk in the wake of their passing. Except for one man. One man, the one in the undershirt, ran ahead of them, looking back over his shoulder as they turned into the hospital grounds. He ran ahead of them waving his arm windmill fashion, as if trying to rid himself of the rolled up paper bag locked in his fist. Beyond him, down the tree-lined road (the fumy air clearing in the trees) was the turreted yellow-brick state hospital at Worcester, a public facility for the mentally ill.
SO THAT’S WHERE THEY’RE GOING!
From the Dartmouth Bible: “Daniel, a Beacon of Faith in a Time of Persecution. Few books of the Old Testament have been so full of enigmas as the Book of Daniel. Though it contains some of the most familiar stories of the Bible, nine of its twelve chapters record weird dreams and visions which have baffled readers for centuries.”
The way to start may be the night before, Memorial Day Eve, when the phone rang. With Daniel and his child bride at sex in their 115th Street den. The music of the Stones pounds the air like the amplified pulse of my erection. And I have finally got her on all fours, hanging there from her youth and shame, her fallen blond hair over her eyes, tears sliding like lovebeads down the long blond hairs of her straight hair. The phone is about to ring. The thing about Phyllis is that when she’s stoned all her inhibitions come out. She gets all tight and vulnerable and our lovemaking degrades her. Phyllis grew up in an apartment in Brooklyn, and her flower life is adopted, it is a principle. Her love of peace is a principle, her long hair, her love for me—all principles. Political decisions. She smokes dope on principle and that’s where I have her. All her instinctive unprincipled beliefs rise to the surface and her knees lock together. She becomes a sex martyr. I think that’s why I married her. So the phone is winding up to ring and here is soft Phyllis from Brooklyn suffering yet another penetration and her tormentor Daniel gently squeezing handfuls of soft ass while he probes her virtue, her motherhood, her vacuum, her vincibles, her vat, her butter tub, and explores the small geography of those distant island ranges, that geology of gland formations, Stalinites and Trotskyites, the Stalinites grow down from the top, the Trotskyites up from the bottom, or is it the other way around—and when we cannot be many moments from a very cruel come that is when the phone...
Produktinformation
- Herausgeber : Random House Publishing Group; Reprint Edition (10. Juli 2007)
- Sprache : Englisch
- Taschenbuch : 319 Seiten
- ISBN-10 : 081297817X
- ISBN-13 : 978-0812978179
- Abmessungen : 13.18 x 1.83 x 20.32 cm
- Kundenrezensionen:
Informationen zum Autor

Entdecke weitere Bücher des Autors, sehe ähnliche Autoren, lese Buchempfehlungen und vieles mehr.
Kundenrezensionen
- 5 Sterne4 Sterne3 Sterne2 Sterne1 Stern5 Sterne44%28%16%7%5%44%
- 5 Sterne4 Sterne3 Sterne2 Sterne1 Stern4 Sterne44%28%16%7%5%28%
- 5 Sterne4 Sterne3 Sterne2 Sterne1 Stern3 Sterne44%28%16%7%5%16%
- 5 Sterne4 Sterne3 Sterne2 Sterne1 Stern2 Sterne44%28%16%7%5%7%
- 5 Sterne4 Sterne3 Sterne2 Sterne1 Stern1 Stern44%28%16%7%5%5%
Kundenbewertungen, einschließlich Produkt-Sternebewertungen, helfen Kunden, mehr über das Produkt zu erfahren und zu entscheiden, ob es das richtige Produkt für sie ist.
Um die Gesamtbewertung der Sterne und die prozentuale Aufschlüsselung nach Sternen zu berechnen, verwenden wir keinen einfachen Durchschnitt. Stattdessen berücksichtigt unser System beispielsweise, wie aktuell eine Bewertung ist und ob der Prüfer den Artikel bei Amazon gekauft hat. Es wurden auch Bewertungen analysiert, um die Vertrauenswürdigkeit zu überprüfen.
Erfahren Sie mehr darüber, wie Kundenbewertungen bei Amazon funktionieren.Spitzenrezensionen aus Deutschland
Derzeit tritt ein Problem beim Filtern der Rezensionen auf. Bitte versuche es später erneut.
- Bewertet in Deutschland am 6. September 2011E.L. Doctorows 1971 novel "The Book of Daniel" is both a fictionalization of the then controversial execution of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg as "atom bomb spies" for the Soviet Union in the Cold War and Anti-Communist hysteria in the USA of the early 1950s and the McCarthy era, as well as an intriguing piece of fiction in its own right, a novel about a young man and his struggle to come to terms with his past and his present life. Daniel Lewin, protagonist and narrator of the novel, is a young graduate student and the elder of two children of the deceased Communist couple Rochelle and Paul Isaacson (easily identifiable as "the Rosenbergs"). In the course of the novel, the reader is granted more and more insight into his present life with his wife and his baby son, his conflicts with his foster parents and his sister, his struggle to position himself as a criticial thinker in the political framework of Vietnam War-traumatized America, and his longing to finally get to know the truth about why his parents were actually executed by a state that claims to be democratic and based on principles of justice. Thereby, the text is shaped by what one could label "postmodern" techniques: Neither is Daniel's life story told in a linear fashion, nor is he a reliable narrator, but rather a very doubtful and sometimes horribly unlikeable character, who on the other hand proves to possess a very intelligent and self-critical mind and does not take anything for granted, not even the left-wing myth of his own parents as heroes. Thus, "The Book of Daniel" delivers an intriguing mixture of captivating episodes of treason and betrayal, sex, rock music and drug abuse, but also reflections about post World War II US governmental policy, political systems in general and, last but not least, Communist ideology, with a critical focus on all these aspects. In this way, the novel manages to draw a multi-layered, critical, clear-sighted and unideological portrait of two periods of American history which are heavily intertwined - and certainly worth looking at from our 21st century perspective. But the most intriguing thing about Doctorow's novel is the fact that albeit this strong political focus, it is still a most personal and touching story of an angry, yet not inhuman young man who has suffered immensely, and who desperately strives to make sense of his existence. "The Book of Daniel" is one of the most complex and intriguing works of American fiction I have ever read - I can only recommend it to everyone who is willing to have a good read not exclusively for the prupose of quick entertainment, but also for serious reflection about such concepts as life, love, death and politics.
- Bewertet in Deutschland am 9. Januar 2022Very touching
Based on a true story about the Rosenbergs being arrested and the effect
- Bewertet in Deutschland am 15. August 2015Interessant geschrieben, politisch sehr linkslastig (die Rosenberg-Affäre dramatisiert). Die Charaktere sind gut gezeichnet, und das Buch vermittelt die paranoide Kommunisten-Jagd-Atmosphäre in den USA in den Fünfzigern.
- Bewertet in Deutschland am 6. Juni 2015I like this book because it pictures very clearly (and realistic) what emotions children go through, when their parents have been wrongly prosecuted by the authorities.
- Bewertet in Deutschland am 7. Dezember 1999I would like to say that I read this book because I'd heard of it, I'd heard of the author, and I really wanted to know what was so special about it. But the truth is that I read it because I had nothing else to read.
However, from the moment I picked it up I knew that this was a special book. From the first page I knew that it would challenge and entertain and inform. From the first page I was enthralled.
As a student of the Cold War and American 20th century history from abroad, it seems as if America's novelists have a cathartic urge to understand their country, perhaps unmatched anywhere in the world. There is a burning desire to understand what it was all about that enthralls many authors: DeLillo, Roth, to name a couple. This book is perhaps the best example of that quest for meaning in a period many people still find troubling.
It is utterly human, brilliantly engaging, wonderfully drawn, and devastatingly important.
When I picked it up, I'd never heard of E.L.Doctorow, by the time I put it down I was resolved to read everything he has written. Unspeakably wonderful. A great novel.
- Bewertet in Deutschland am 28. Mai 2000I had high hopes for this novel, arriving on my doorstop with a flurry of peer-approval. However, the book does not add up the the sum of its parts--it seems slipshop at times, especially in the rendering of Daniel's change from regretful, damaged son to sixties radical. Perhaps it's dated--the metafictional techniques, especially the shifts from first to third person and back again, lack the force they may once have had--it seems quaint, and is not very effective.
- Bewertet in Deutschland am 24. Januar 1999Doctorow's fictionalized account of a couple's cold war trial and execution and the consequent struggles of the couple's children is a highly political work. Though written over a quarter-century ago, the book's politics are not stale or dated. In fact, the issues raised are as pertinent as when the book was first published, in 1971. The chilling collaboration of government and media to control public opinion raises questions of how a nation can be truly free when access to information is limited. The book's freshness derives also from the personal travails of Daniel, the oldest child of the executed couple. Doctorow is magnificent in showing how Daniel has been damaged without becoming mauldin or overly sentimental in his portrayal. I found the frequent switch between first- and third-person accounts rather distracting, and it sometimes is unclear whether the action being described occurs in the early fifties or in 1967, present-day in the novel. Nonetheless, an excellent work.
- Bewertet in Deutschland am 8. Oktober 2007"The Book of Daniel" is one of my favourite novels ever. It depicts the Rosenberg trial and the long-term effect for those left behind: the two orphans Daniel and Susanna. Historically the novel extends from the McCarthy era to the sixties. Next to the historcial references Doctorow portrays humans' souls by a wonderful narrative technique. His metaphorical and metatechnical modus operandi is simply outstanding!
Spitzenrezensionen aus anderen Ländern
-
Carmen DumitriuBewertet in Italien am 31. März 20164,0 von 5 Sternen Buono
Il libro va bene, e arrivato un po' in ritardo, ma e stato utile comunque. Sarebbe bene se non li servirebbero due settimane per mandare il libro.
-
alex proctorBewertet in Großbritannien am 20. Juli 20155,0 von 5 Sternen The book is written from the perspective of Daniel and explores the Macarthy period with great insight and telling observation
This deals with the arrest and trial and subsequent execution of the Rosenburghs and the effects their incarceration had on their two children . The book is written from the perspective of Daniel and explores the Macarthy period with great insight and telling observation. If anyone needed to be convinced why the death penalty should be abolished in America, then the description of both their deaths is essential reading. Horrendous period in American history - but with the rising inequality in the USA today the book still has relevance on Americans ideas on freedom and the pursuit of happiness!
-
JanelleBewertet in den USA am22. Dezember 20105,0 von 5 Sternen Excellent
The Story: As the novel opens a young man named Daniel, his wife and their baby are traveling to Worcester MA to see Susan, Daniels sister, who has recently attempted suicide. The most important event in Daniel and Susans childhood was the execution of their parents during the 1950s era Red Scare for conspiring to commit espionage. Susan has never been able to get past the trauma. She has however become a radical protesting the Vietnam War and wishes to set up a fund for revolutionary groups in memory of her parents. Daniel however is far more conflicted about the legacy of his parents and it's effect on him. While Susan became a radical Daniel removed himself from politics. He is supposed to be writing his dissertation at Columbia but instead writes "The Book of Daniel" a recounting of the time just before, during and after the execution of his parents. The novel is not linear Daniel bounces between his present circumstances, his childhood and points in between. He also shifts from 1st to 3rd person at random. Daniel alternates throughout the novel between a deep respect and admiration for his parents and a mocking disdain for them.
The Good: Pretty much everything. The non-linear narrative structure really conveyed how the execution of his parents reverberated through every aspect of Daniels adult life. Daniel is not always particularly likeable. He abuses his wife and in one instance his young child. Yet throughout you understand why Daniel is this way. The parts recounting Daniels childhood created a strong sense of claustrophobia as the story moved towards his parents execution. Daniels parents were not portrayed as revolutionary maytrs rather they were everyday people who happened to have radical ideas. I particularly loved how an entire period in history was encapsulated in the experience of one family. The most amazing thing about this book by far was the humanity of each character. From Daniels parents, to Daniel himself and to his sister Susan, even to the most unsympathetic Dr Mindish, each is ultimately only a flawed human being struggling to come to terms with their own lives and choices.
The Not So Good: Nothing to say here. I feel like anything I would think up would be at best nitpicky and at worst seeking out a criticism for its own sake.
The Bottom Line: For an unflinching and at times heartbreaking examination of how individuals get caught up and carried away by the currents of history pick this up.
-
Mrs's anonBewertet in Großbritannien am 7. August 20214,0 von 5 Sternen Based on the Rosenbergs.
Got very depressed as I read. Had just finished the biography of Ethel Rosenberg which is why I read it. As dark as its cover. Couldn't empathise with the narrator. Didn't enjoy it.
-
Martha MillerBewertet in den USA am4. Februar 20164,0 von 5 Sternen The Rosenbergs
I've been trying to read more Doctorow since his death. I have read several others, but I wanted to read him homage to the Rosenbergs. The story is told by the son and is at the same time first and third person. I found the childhood of Daniel and his parents arrests, trials and executions interesting and well told. These stories are woven in with an adult sadistic Daniel who (understandably) is still seeking answers. And I suppose if there's something I didn't care for it is his unapologetic treatment of his wife. As I said, it is understandable. I just wonder if it was the path of least resistance.