Facebook Twitter Pinterest <Einbetten>
Gebraucht kaufen
EUR 19,70
+ EUR 3,00 Versandkosten
Gebraucht: Sehr gut | Details
Verkauft von Nearfine
Zustand: Gebraucht: Sehr gut
Kommentar: Leichte Gebrauchsspuren. Lieferung voraussichtlich innerhalb von 2-3 Wochen.
Möchten Sie verkaufen?
Zur Rückseite klappen Zur Vorderseite klappen
Hörprobe Wird gespielt... Angehalten   Sie hören eine Hörprobe des Audible Hörbuch-Downloads.
Mehr erfahren
Dieses Bild anzeigen

The Victory Lab: The Secret Science of Winning Campaigns (Englisch) Gebundene Ausgabe – 11. September 2012

5.0 von 5 Sternen 1 Kundenrezension

Alle Formate und Ausgaben anzeigen Andere Formate und Ausgaben ausblenden
Neu ab Gebraucht ab
Kindle Edition
"Bitte wiederholen"
Gebundene Ausgabe, 11. September 2012
EUR 35,45 EUR 19,70
3 neu ab EUR 35,45 5 gebraucht ab EUR 19,70
click to open popover

Es wird kein Kindle Gerät benötigt. Laden Sie eine der kostenlosen Kindle Apps herunter und beginnen Sie, Kindle-Bücher auf Ihrem Smartphone, Tablet und Computer zu lesen.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone

Geben Sie Ihre Mobiltelefonnummer ein, um die kostenfreie App zu beziehen.

Jeder kann Kindle Bücher lesen — selbst ohne ein Kindle-Gerät — mit der KOSTENFREIEN Kindle App für Smartphones, Tablets und Computer.




“Indispensable. . . . Issenberg has a firm grounding in the political universe. . . . [He] paints his insurgents in heroic terms, putting the spotlight on campaign warriors few of us have ever heard of. . . . [The Victory Lab is] a magical mystery tour of contemporary campaigns. By the end, a lot of the mystery will become clear, and you’ll know a whole lot more about what’s behind those calls and letters jamming your phone lines and mailboxes.” —Jeff Greenfield, The Washington Post

“[The Victory Lab] traces an under-reported element of the evolution of campaign tactics over nearly a half-century in an unusually accessible and engaging manner. . . . A timely, rare, and valuable attempt to unveil the innovations revolutionizing campaign politics.” —The New Republic

“Brainy.” —New York

“A magnificently reported and wonderfully written book, full of eye-opening revelations and a colorful cast of characters whose groundbreaking strategies and tactics have injected 21st-century science into politics and changed it forever in the process. The Victory Lab is essential for anyone who wants to understand what really goes on along the campaign trail—and a delight for those who simply enjoy a terrific read.” —John Heilemann and Mark Halperin, authors of Game Change

“Sasha Issenberg cracks open the secretive realm of modern campaigns, revealing a revolution that is influencing not only who wins elections but also the fate of the nation.  This is a terrific and important book.” —David Grann, author of The Lost City of Z

“Sasha Issenberg is our most acute observer of the modern political campaign. With vivid portraiture and crystal-clear prose, he takes us beyond the charge-and-counter-charge, the rallies and stump speeches, to show us the hidden persuaders. This is the politics you'll never see on the nightly news.” —Richard Ben Cramer, author of What it Takes

Über den Autor und weitere Mitwirkende

Sasha Issenberg is a columnist for Slate and the Washington correspondent for Monocle.  He covered the 2008 election as a national political correspondent for The Boston Globe, and his work has also appeared in New York, The Atlantic, and The New York Times Magazine.  His first book, The Sushi Economy, was published in 2007.


5.0 von 5 Sternen
5 Sterne
4 Sterne
3 Sterne
2 Sterne
1 Stern
Siehe die Kundenrezension
Sagen Sie Ihre Meinung zu diesem Artikel


Format: Taschenbuch Verifizierter Kauf
Ich habe mir das Buch gekauft, um Anregungen für den Wahlkampf in Deutschland zu erhalten. Das Buch vermittelt keine direkt nutzbaren praktischen Tipps, zeigt aber auf, wie weit sich die Wahlkampftechniken noch entwickeln könnten. Das inspiriert.

Kurz gefasst liefert das Buch die Geschichte des modernen Wahlkampfs in den USA. Dessen Entwicklung wird anhand von einigen Personen erläutert.
Kommentar Eine Person fand diese Informationen hilfreich. War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich? Ja Nein Feedback senden...
Vielen Dank für Ihr Feedback.
Wir konnten Ihre Stimmabgabe leider nicht speichern. Bitte erneut versuchen
Missbrauch melden

Die hilfreichsten Kundenrezensionen auf Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: 4.1 von 5 Sternen 91 Rezensionen
99 von 105 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
3.0 von 5 Sternen No secrets, some good science 10. August 2012
Von Aaron C. Brown - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format: Gebundene Ausgabe Vine Kundenrezension eines kostenfreien Produkts ( Was ist das? )
I basically agree with previous reviewers Paul Tognetti and Dan Bobinski that this book presents some interesting research but is too long and repetitious. However my main complaint is different. This book does not reveal, as the subtitle claims, "The secret science of winning campaigns." The author appears to have had a preconceived storyline, the Moneyball of politics, which doesn't fit the facts. Unfortunately, this framing causes the author to miss a much more interesting and important story contained in this material.

The Victory Lab traces a nearly century-long academic quest that began with a simple question: Why do some people not vote? Extensive laboratory and field research has thrown some fascinating light on this question, which goes to the heart of what democracy means. Which people vote affects more than the result of an election, it affects group identities and how people feel about the result and how the elected officials act, which in turn set the political environment for the next election, and thereby is an essential determinant of the nature of civil society. The most interesting thinkers profiled in the book deal with these issues in their full complexity.

Some of the theory and experimental data developed in this quest might be useful for influencing close elections. This is the main focus of the book, which leads the author to spend too much time on shallow thinkers with narrow partisan (or in some cases merely financial) goals. Yes, it's impressive how much you can influence people's decision whether to vote through simple micro-targeted threats, bribes and even mere contacts. But it's not clear that these are cost-effective ways to influence elections.

One crucial assumption is the extra votes you shake out of the tree fall to candidates in the same proportion as voluntary voters in the same subgroup. There could be differences in voting patterns between eager and reluctant voters, and the means for stimulating voting may influence the vote as well. Moreover, the absolute numbers are so small, a few percent of the microtargeted population, that even a small effect on the rest might overwhelm the change due to the additional voters. There are no barriers to entry in this business, so any advantage the techniques confer could be quickly erased by the other side. Some of the techniques may work in small academic or pilot studies because they are unusual, but might fail when applied on a meaningful scale. Perhaps most important, the election has to be almost a dead heat before these tricks can make any difference so at most they are the final crack of the whip that sends one racehorse a nose ahead of another rather than the secret to winning elections.

Behavioral psychology and quantitative methods may someday become a secret science of winning elections, but the author wildly oversells his evidence by claiming that day has already arrived. It seems more likely to me that these ideas will refine the idea of democracy and help public-spirited people build better elections, that lead to a better society. Anyway, I hope that's true.
36 von 38 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
3.0 von 5 Sternen The tug-of-war between the geeks and the gurus. 31. Juli 2012
Von Paul Tognetti - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format: Gebundene Ausgabe Vine Kundenrezension eines kostenfreien Produkts ( Was ist das? )
My, how times have changed! In years gone by political campaigns hoped to drum up support utilizing the traditional methods of radio and television ads, direct mail and polling. This was the approach favored by those whom author Sasha Issenberg dubs "the gurus". According to Issenberg "the gurus were the celebrated political wise men whose practices had become the political default, thanks to their success serving up a cocktail of lore and myth, anecdote and inertia that could so thoroughly intoxicate the candidates who paid their bills." But in the view of a growing number of political scientists these methods were rapidly becoming outdated due to the advent of an array of exciting new technologies. All of a sudden it was possible to identify "undecided" voters who might be sympathetic to your candidate and to "nudge" non-voters as well. These innovative new get-out-the vote (GOTV)strategies being championed by the so-called "geeks" who worked quietly behind the scenes would pose a direct threat to the entrenched and high-profile political consultants. This ongoing battle between the "geeks" and the "gurus" is the story Sasha Issenberg tells in "The Victory Lab: The Secret Science of Winning Campaigns". I had very high hopes for this book when I plucked it off the Amazon Vine. But for reasons that I will discuss shortly I came away a bit disappointed.

Perhaps the most important lesson that campaigns have learned from the political scientists is that finding small, refined batches of voters really matters. This is a strategy that is very cost effective and runs counter to the traditional radio and television buys and newspaper ads favored by the consultants. Making this a part of the overall game plan proved to be one of the keys to the success of Barack Obama's 2008 presidential campaign. I learned that it is now possible to create mailings aimed at small clusters of voters that have been "micro-targeted" by the campaign. Researchers have discovered that targeted mailings with themes emphasizing civic duty, community solidarity and touting the idea that "your vote could make the difference" can be surprisingly effective. Likewise ongoing research has uncovered the fact that personal contact with the voter in the days leading up to an election can yield impressive results in increasing turnout for your candidate or cause. Sasha Issenberg chronicles how several of these campaign tactics turned the tide in favor of the Democrats in a pair of key U.S. Senate races in 2010. Issenberg also introduces his readers to a number of the key players who were responsible for formulating these innovative and highly successful techniques.

While the subject matter is indeed quite interesting I have a couple of major problems with "The Victory Lab". First and foremost I believe that this book is much too long. In my view Sasha Issenberg could have effectively made his case in about 50-75 fewer pages. Frankly, I began to lose interest about two-thirds of the way through the book. In addition the author's frequent use of insider jargon proved to be a real obstacle for me. It appears that the target audience for "The Victory Lab: The Secret Science of Winning Campaigns" are those in academia, political operatives and bloggers who are deeply immersed in this stuff. This is not a particularly easy read for general audiences. In my view this was a good idea for a book that just misses the mark. As such I am only able to muster a lukewarm recommendation.
50 von 55 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
4.0 von 5 Sternen Data-Driven Political Campaigns 19. August 2012
Von not a natural - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format: Gebundene Ausgabe Vine Kundenrezension eines kostenfreien Produkts ( Was ist das? )
Sasha Issenberg's book The Victory Lab is well written and, for the most part, quite interesting. It is, however, a good deal longer than need be to tell its story. This is due to the author's interest in not only explaining recent developments in mounting effective political campaigns, but also giving a good deal of attention to the history of such efforts, including background on the principal participants over the last forty years. I had not expected the historical material in a book subtitled "The Secret Science of Winning Campaigns," and it sometimes gets in the way of a streamlined presentation of technical issues. The book presupposes little or no knowledge of research design, statistics, or measurement theory. That's all to the good, but if the text included less chatty historical coverage and more discussion of the fundamentals of pertinent quantitative techniques, The Victory Lab would be a more satisfying read.

The two basic themes that undergird Issenberg's account are micro-targeting of prospective voters and random assignment of treatment and control status to permit interpretable comparisons. Micro-targeting means gaining access to individuals and small, homogeneous groups rather than using data aggregated to the precinct, county, or other geographical level. Micro-targeting enables political analysts and operatives to identify conveniently small groups that do not correspond to pre-drawn geographical or administrative boundaries and to use their peculiar characteristics to focus get-out-the-vote campaigns and messages tailored to enhance the appeal of a specific candidate. The shopworn,conventional, broad-brush alternative is to use existing data sets that aggregate measures to a higher level, such as the county.

As an example, after the 2004 presidential election that pitted George W. Bush against John Kerry, I had a data set consisting of all 3140 counties in the u.S. Using a variation on conventional multiple regression analysis, I was able to determine that the most powerful county-level predictor of the percentage voting for Bush was a fairly crude measure of "traditional family values." It was easy to identify the counties that were unusually high on the "traditional family values" measure, and in subsequent elections candidates might have reasoned that these counties would be favorably disposed to Republicans generally, not just to Bush, and they might have targeted their get-out-the-vote efforts accordingly. Sounds plausible, but the "traditional family values" variable had a very strong positive correlation with income, which could mean that many of the families were wealthy enough to employ live-in help. The impact of a get-out-the-vote drive, as a result, might be diminished for Republicans because it would also energize the low-income, perhaps Black or Latino, cooks, housekeepers, gardeners, and handymen, who were more likely to vote for a Democrat.

Similarly, the "traditional family values" variable had a strong positive correlation with voter turnout. This might lead one to the conclusion that resources devoted to increasing voter turnout would be wasted if they were expended on Republican voters who would turn out anyway. Instead, the prospective voters actually affected might be the hired help, perhaps low-income minorities who, again, would vote for Democrats.

However, micro-targeting of smaller, homogeneous aggregates or individuals themselves provides a way around this broad-brush difficulty, enabling us to concentrate on just those citizens we actually want to reach. As Issenberg makes clear, however, assembling data adequate to this task is time-consuming and very expensive, and it requires a long-term commitment to maintaining and updating data files, as well as employing analysts with the statistical and measurement skills needed to put it to good use. Nevertheless, micro-targeting -- reaching out and touching individuals and small groups -- is now a staple technique used by both parties.

Issenberg's second basic theme, use of randomized experiments, makes micro-targeting, as well as more conventional approaches, much more effective. For example, suppose we had used micro-targeting to identify clusters of affluent "traditional family values" voters who, contrary to convention, cannot be relied on to turn out on election day. Randomization assures that any treatments, such as mailings to non-voters that include a call to vote, will not be confounded with other variables, and we can vary the wording of the message, compare results of different messages from one cluster to another, and decide which is most effective. Subsequent work can then incorporate these insights.

It remains true, however, that micro-targeting and random assignment as used in The Victory Lab, are, for the most part, exercises in naked empiricism and guess work. Methodologically they may be exemplary, but substantively and theoretically they tend to be quite thin, relying heavily on expensive trial and error and indiscriminate data dredging. This may help to explain Democrats' disastrous performance in the 2010 midterm elections. Issenberg very briefly mentions 2010, but he does not begin to do it justice as a challenge to the efficacy of micro-targeting and random assignment. I think that a great deal of theoretical work, such as that reported by Robert Entman (2012) in Scandal and Silence, needs to be done to take more uncertainty out of even the most methodologically rigorous political campaigns.

The Victory Lab does a good job of documenting the introduction of methodological precision into data-driven election campaigns. However, Issenberg leaves the reader with the impression that political science is nothing but more and better analyses of voting behavior, and that a rich substantive and theoretical literature is not necessary to guiding the efforts of those who collect and analyze data. Both impressions are wrong.

Issenberg obliquely acknowledges that contemporary developments aimed at more effectively influencing voting behavior may be rightly interpreted as manipulation, unscrupulously useful to anyone with the resources to employ them, whatever their political objectives. I find this "value free" framework unsettling, hardly the stuff of democracy as most of us conceive it.

The Victory Lab is an interesting, even if unduly long and philosophically short-sighted book. I benefited from reading it and would recommend it to others.
11 von 11 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
4.0 von 5 Sternen Good book for poliical geeks... 5. September 2012
Von Jill Meyer - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format: Gebundene Ausgabe Vine Kundenrezension eines kostenfreien Produkts ( Was ist das? )
The 2012 election is upon us and there are basically two types of people. Those who tune into politics - off and on - during their on-going busy lives, and those of us who are obsessed with politics. Being obsessed, being a political geek, means you know more stray, useless facts about political history and political personalities. We live to watch Morning Joe on MSNBC or Fox and Friends in the morning. We haunt the blogs - both Democratic-leaning and Republican-leaning - and embarrassingly know the noms-de-politics who post comments on the blogs. We love politics and can debate arcane scenarios with the verve of Civil War scholars who endlessly posit unanswerable questions about battles and "only if?"/"only if?"

Sasha Issenberg has written a book, "The Victory Lab", for those political geeks. Certainly the politically unaware or politically uninterested would not get much out of Issenberg's book. But he looks at past elections to see the tangibles and the intangibles that influenced the results. He looks at what political advisers - that strange group of ultra-political geeks - using statistics and new computer models plot the campaigns of the future. Issenberg introduces the reader to the behind-the-scene political consultants. The book may be a little too long, as other reviewers have already noted, but what Issenberg writes is fascinating.
11 von 12 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
3.0 von 5 Sternen The evolution of political science 8. August 2012
Von Dan Bobinski - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format: Gebundene Ausgabe Vine Kundenrezension eines kostenfreien Produkts ( Was ist das? )
This book should have been sub-titled "The evolution of political science over the last 100 years." A bit windy and repetitive (as far as the theme goes), the book documents how analytical types finally made inroads into political campaigning, and how they could have been more helpful all along--if only people had listened to them.

Overall, the feeling I got after reading each chapter was "same story as the last chapter, but this time the analysts gained a little more credibility than the previous election cycle."

That said, I do believe everyone involved in campaigning for public office or ballot measures ought to read this, especially if they want the best chance at winning. If you fit into that category, or if you're thinking of getting into politics, you'll gain tremendous insights into the past 100 years of campaigning, and you can learn from other people's mistakes (and what the winners did right). A big golden nugget for me was learning that what helped you win "last time" won't help you win "this time." However, that same message could have been conveyed in a shorter book.

Interestingly, the day I was reading the book to write this review, I saw a news headline that read "Obama campaign deploys data mining operation." Given that this book reveals the depth to which Obama relied on microtargeting techniques in 2008, and and given that the book also outlines how analysts can mine increasingly detailed data with each election cycle, I can only imagine the depth to which Obama's campaign is excavating, sorting, and using data to direct their actions in 2012.

Business Application: As a business person, I was hoping that some of the practices described in the book would help for developing marketing campaigns in the business world. Alas, no such luck. As the author points out, the intense methods described are for running a one-time political campaign that culminates in one desired action from a person (a "vote") on one particular day. After reviewing the techniques described, I don't think they would transfer economically into business. Sure, making decisions based on target market data permeates the text, but the techniques described are for political campaigns.

With that, the book probably wouldn't have much appeal for anyone outside of politics. I found myself wanting to lend it to a friend of mine who's heavily involved in state and national political campaigns.

Overall the book is a little too repetitive in its theme, and therefore it's a tad too long.
I'd give it four stars if you're in politics and have never studied microtargeting before, because you'll learn a lot. I give it three and a half stars for the rest of us, which I round down to three (Amazon meaning = "it's okay") because the book is about 20 percent longer than it needs to be.
Waren diese Rezensionen hilfreich? Wir wollen von Ihnen hören.