- Taschenbuch: 384 Seiten
- Verlag: Vintage (5. Januar 2012)
- Sprache: Englisch
- ISBN-10: 0099498022
- ISBN-13: 978-0099498025
- Größe und/oder Gewicht: 12,9 x 2,7 x 19,8 cm
- Durchschnittliche Kundenbewertung: Schreiben Sie die erste Bewertung
- Amazon Bestseller-Rang: Nr. 33.641 in Fremdsprachige Bücher (Siehe Top 100 in Fremdsprachige Bücher)
Self Comes to Mind: Constructing the Conscious Brain (Englisch) Taschenbuch – 5. Januar 2012
|Neu ab||Gebraucht ab|
Wird oft zusammen gekauft
Kunden, die diesen Artikel gekauft haben, kauften auch
Es wird kein Kindle Gerät benötigt. Laden Sie eine der kostenlosen Kindle Apps herunter und beginnen Sie, Kindle-Bücher auf Ihrem Smartphone, Tablet und Computer zu lesen.
Geben Sie Ihre Mobiltelefonnummer ein, um die kostenfreie App zu beziehen.
Wenn Sie dieses Produkt verkaufen, möchten Sie über Seller Support Updates vorschlagen?
"Breathtakingly original" (Financial Times)
"Awareness may be mostly mystery, but Damasio shapes its hints and glimmerings into an imaginative, informed narrative" (Kirkus)
"The marvel of reading Damasio's book is to be convinced one can follow the brain at work as it makes the private reality that is the deepest self" (V. S. Naipaul)
"Damasio's most ambitious work yet. It is a lucid and important work" (Word)
"The epicenter of Self Comes to Mind concerns the neurological basis for cognition and the issue of the superposition of a "self' onto the construct which we address as reality. Damasio is both eloquent and scholarly. His command of the themes he approaches is impressive, as is the vigor with which he tackles such recondite issues as the elusive "self," inside the head. A wonderful read, and a recommended one!" (Rodolfo R. Llinás, New York University)
A profound and groundbreaking new book telling the story of consciousness and the human mind, from one of the world's leading neuroscientists.Alle Produktbeschreibungen
Welche anderen Artikel kaufen Kunden, nachdem sie diesen Artikel angesehen haben?
Die hilfreichsten Kundenrezensionen auf Amazon.com
The self experience as--(1) primordial, (2) core and (3) autobiographical--is pure explanatory power, since it allows for the embodied self experience, the customary self experience, and the self experience we become to ourselves and others (autobiographical/narrative)--all foundational to reality--with implicated underlying neuroanatomical processes: brain stem, thalamus, cerebral cortex, respectively.
I loved hearing this neuroscientist give his account of witnessing a Pelican diving into the water: all explained by underlying neuroanatomical processes. Damasio, as a neuroscientist, has neuroanatomical maps that the rest of us do not see. That makes it very tempting for him to believe that what he "sees" automatically is truth.
Damasio has a long history of fighting against the cognitive bent of both neuroscience and philosophy. He has provided cogent research on the foundation of emotions in neuroscience, which is still an uphill battle. He fought against philosophers who would reduce the human to Cartesian dualism. Congratulations to him for fighting the good fight, against the grain.
And yet he finds himself ironically being critiqued for making the cognitive error of mistaking his scientific observations for philosophical truth, the circular reasoning of assuming consciousness to explain consciousness, call it what you will: [...] (See John Searle, New York Review of Books, 2011)
To clear it up, I have an idea of how to approach eliminating the problem for the reader:
(1) If you think of having a text replace function, and go through his book and do the following: replace "image" with map (or schema), replace "self" with "self experience," and replace "consciousness" with "experience of consciousness," you will eliminate the problem of word choice. However, you can take the words out of the argument, but you can't take the argument out of the words.
(2) Watch out for the ideological/metaphysical argument. He is arguing for "consciousness" as a construct (as a "thing-in-itself"), and for "self" as an agent of consciousness, and as "consciousness" as an increased level of species development. That is when the philosophers and all of us general readers start reacting/disorienting, and feel confused because he has gone off the road. You can tell when he is in the ditch: when he starts claiming that he is not Cartesian, because he is arguing for the existence of consciousness, that "image" is not about a false Cartesian correspondence theory between what we see and what is there, etc.. This false idealism is not only disorienting to critics and us, but also to his ability to simply put his brilliant science out there and let it speak for itself: Just let our sense of self be the product of the consciousness processes outlined.
(3) Enjoy this otherwise brilliant life-work.
(4) Networks of the Brain by Olaf Sporns helps to found brain mapping in a more coherent and emergent context so that the philosophical pitfalls of Damasio's approach are avoided.
PS: You can skip the last chapter. His attempts to apply his theory to real life problems seem painfully naive: "cognitive unconscious" regarding ethics (yikes)? A neurobiological basis for writing just laws for society? etc.
Unfortunately, the subject is difficult to present clearly for casual readers and accurately for experts. I give the author 4 stars for trying, but I'd give him 5 stars if he had included more diagrams and a more detailed appendix as a tutorial. He does include a few diagrams, but he should have included some that show every brain region he mentions in the text. As I was reading the book, I kept a textbook on the anatomy of the brain nearby so that I could look up the regions he mentioned.
In general, I would consider this book required reading for students and experts in any branch of cognitive science that addresses phenomena and mechanisms related to consciousness. The footnotes contain copious references and occasional insights that clarify issues discussed in the text. One footnote, for example, mentions the effects of propofol on the brain and explains why it was so powerful and dangerous for Michael Jackson.
Ähnliche Artikel finden