Facebook Twitter Pinterest <Einbetten>
EUR 7,99
  • Statt: EUR 8,99
  • Sie sparen: EUR 1,00 (11%)
  • Alle Preisangaben inkl. MwSt.
Auf Lager.
Verkauf und Versand durch Amazon. Geschenkverpackung verfügbar.
A Line in the Sand: Brita... ist in Ihrem Einkaufwagen hinzugefügt worden
Möchten Sie verkaufen?
Zur Rückseite klappen Zur Vorderseite klappen
Hörprobe Wird gespielt... Angehalten   Sie hören eine Hörprobe des Audible Hörbuch-Downloads.
Mehr erfahren
Alle 2 Bilder anzeigen

A Line in the Sand: Britain, France and the Struggle That Shaped the Middle East (Englisch) Taschenbuch – 26. April 2012

5.0 von 5 Sternen 3 Kundenrezensionen

Alle Formate und Ausgaben anzeigen Andere Formate und Ausgaben ausblenden
Preis
Neu ab Gebraucht ab
Kindle Edition
"Bitte wiederholen"
Taschenbuch
"Bitte wiederholen"
EUR 7,99
EUR 4,99 EUR 8,34
61 neu ab EUR 4,99 7 gebraucht ab EUR 8,34
click to open popover

Wird oft zusammen gekauft

  • A Line in the Sand: Britain, France and the Struggle That Shaped the Middle East
  • +
  • A Peace to End All Peace: The Fall of the Ottoman Empire and the Creation of the Modern Middle East
  • +
  • The Fall of the Ottomans: The Great War in the Middle East, 1914-1920
Gesamtpreis: EUR 34,93
Die ausgewählten Artikel zusammen kaufen

Es wird kein Kindle Gerät benötigt. Laden Sie eine der kostenlosen Kindle Apps herunter und beginnen Sie, Kindle-Bücher auf Ihrem Smartphone, Tablet und Computer zu lesen.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone

Geben Sie Ihre Mobiltelefonnummer ein, um die kostenfreie App zu beziehen.

Jeder kann Kindle Bücher lesen — selbst ohne ein Kindle-Gerät — mit der KOSTENFREIEN Kindle App für Smartphones, Tablets und Computer.



Produktinformation

Produktbeschreibungen

Über den Autor und weitere Mitwirkende

James Barr has worked for the Daily Telegraph, in politics, and in the City, and has travelled widely in the Middle East. He is the author of Setting the Desert on Fire, a history of T.E. Lawrence and the secret war in Arabia. During the research for A Line in the Sand he was a visiting fellow at St Antony's College, Oxford.


Kundenrezensionen

5.0 von 5 Sternen
5 Sterne
3
4 Sterne
0
3 Sterne
0
2 Sterne
0
1 Stern
0
Alle 3 Kundenrezensionen anzeigen
Sagen Sie Ihre Meinung zu diesem Artikel

Top-Kundenrezensionen

Format: Taschenbuch Verifizierter Kauf
James Barr picks the story of ,A Line in the Sand` up where he left it in ,Setting the Desert on Fire` - the infamous Sykes-(George-)Picot-Agreement providing the basis for the disasters that were to ensue from it. Commercial (Turkish Petroleum Company, bifurcated pipeline to Haifa and Syria) and imperial/colonial considerations drove the British (Mesopotamia and Palestine) and the French (Lebanon and Syria) to conclude (short-lived) alliances with each other (Churchill and de Gaulle) only to stab each other in the back as soon as an opportunity permitted it (the French supporting the Jewish resistance against British occupation with arms, shelter and information, the British supporting Lebanese and Syrian movements to drive the French out of the Levant).

The struggle in the Middle East between the British and the French had no winners - both were to leave as their `empires' fell apart.

Great book.
Kommentar 3 Personen fanden diese Informationen hilfreich. War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich? Ja Nein Feedback senden...
Vielen Dank für Ihr Feedback.
Wir konnten Ihre Stimmabgabe leider nicht speichern. Bitte erneut versuchen
Missbrauch melden
Format: Taschenbuch Verifizierter Kauf
Ein exzellenter Überblick über die Enstehung der heutigen staatlichen Ordnund des Nahen Ostens nach dem Ersten Weltkrieg. Man lernt viel über die Arroganz von Großmächten (Großbritannien und Frankreich), die es als Selbstverständlichkeit betrachten, ganze Weltregionen für sich auszubeuten, wenn sich denn die Gelegenheit bietet. Man erfährt auch viel über Unterschiede im Stil und die Gedankenlosigkeit, aber auch Ahnungslosigkeit, mit der Politik gemacht wurde.
Kommentar 4 Personen fanden diese Informationen hilfreich. War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich? Ja Nein Feedback senden...
Vielen Dank für Ihr Feedback.
Wir konnten Ihre Stimmabgabe leider nicht speichern. Bitte erneut versuchen
Missbrauch melden
Format: Taschenbuch Verifizierter Kauf
Nuanciert, sehr gut zu lesen, gut recherchiert (nicht nur in westlichen Archiven), absolut lesens- und empfehlenswert. Ohne eine solche Analyse kann man den Nahen Osten heute und die aktuelle Fluechtlingskrise nicht verstehen
Kommentar Eine Person fand diese Informationen hilfreich. War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich? Ja Nein Feedback senden...
Vielen Dank für Ihr Feedback.
Wir konnten Ihre Stimmabgabe leider nicht speichern. Bitte erneut versuchen
Missbrauch melden

Die hilfreichsten Kundenrezensionen auf Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: 4.1 von 5 Sternen 16 Rezensionen
9 von 10 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
2.0 von 5 Sternen This well-written and researched book has been spoiled by a ... 20. Februar 2015
Von Richard Lightbown - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format: Taschenbuch
This well-written and researched book has been spoiled by a plethora of petty errors and omissions. This limits its use as an academic source. I did not record all the inaccuracies that I noticed, but the following come to mind:
1) Britain did no ‘seize’ Cyprus in 1878 (p9): it was leased to the British Empire following the Congress of Berlin.
2) Neither did Britain ‘seize’ the Suez Canal (p9): it took out a loan from Rothschild to buy the Egyptian Government’s stock.
3) In his account of the Fashoda Incident of 1898 Barr omits any reference to the Anglo-Egyptian victory under Kitchener at Omdurman earlier in that year when nearly 10,000 Sudanese were killed for the loss of 28 British and 20 Egyptians. It was hardly surprising therefore that the French force of 12 French officers and 150 Senegalese soldiers was ordered to withdraw after Kitchener arrived at Fashoda with 2,500 Sudanese soldiers and five gunboats with Maxim guns and field-guns.
4) The suggestion that Ronald Storrs was responsible for instigating the Hussein-McMahon correspondence (p23) is implausible, although the egotistical Storrs may have claimed this to have been so. Hussein’s son Abdullah had contacted Kitchener in February 1914 when the latter was British Agent and Consul-General in Egypt. Although Kitchener was non-committal, contacts had been maintained. Storrs, who was not fully fluent in Arabic, was more likely to have been responsible for the gaffs in the correspondence, such as the suggestion that Lebanese Christians were not Arabs.
5) Herbert Samuel is similarly credited for the work of others on p32. Samuel was certainly an ardent Zionist, but the real hard graft and intrigue to secure the Balfour Declaration was led by Chaim Weizmann, backed by Walter Rothschild.
6) Barr mentions on p51 that Allenby’s predecessor had twice failed to capture Gaza. In fact the town had been captured during the first Battle of Gaza but Dobell had feared a counter attack and had ordered a withdrawal. The exhausted troops were unable to recapture the town the following day. Barr does not mention that gas and tanks were used during the Second Battle although both were rendered ineffective by the heat and, in the case of the tanks, the sandy conditions. The town was razed by shelling from Australian artillery and the French Navy during the third battle.
7) The account of the riot at Haifa oil refinery is misleading. The Irgun had thrown grenades into a crowd of Arab workers killing six and wounding forty-two. This provoked the attack on Jewish workers in the refinery, for which Ilan Pappé gives different casualty figures (39 killed and 49 wounded). The Jewish Agency publically condemned the Irgun atrocity but secretly authorised the Hagannah to carry out retaliation. This took the form of raids on the villages of Balad al-Shaykh and Hawsha where houses were blown and set on fire and according to Zachary Lockman some 60 were killed, included women and children.
8) The death toll at Deir Yassin (p365) is generally reckoned to be much less than 250, even by scholars critical of the Zionist actions. Barr ought to have mentioned that the village had an agreement with the Hagannah that it would not allow Arab fighters to stay there and in return the Zionists had promised not to attack it. In consequence Haganah forces had not intended to take part in the attack. However Stern Gang and Irgun members had been unable to overcome resistance in the headman’s house (they were more familiar with caching bombs and ambushing soldiers and unarmed civilians) so a nearby Palmach unit was briefly called in to suppress the resistance.
9) The victims of the reprisal massacre on Mt Scopus in Jerusalem (p366) were not all non-combatants (Barr describes them as ‘doctors, nurses and students’). The dead included two members of the Irgun injured at Deir Yassin, and members of the armed escort from the Hagannah.
10) The Altalena which Barr describes on p364 as a 'landing craft' was actually a landing ship, tank (LST) of 4,800 tons.

The problem of this sloppy writing is that when Barr gets into original material from his own researches one is unable to to accept it at face value but is also unable to verify it from other sources. This considerably detracts from the value of the work as a source of reference.
5 von 5 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
4.0 von 5 Sternen thoroughly entertaining review of one of the most tempestuous periods in modern history 27. April 2014
Von Adam Royale - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format: Kindle Edition Verifizierter Kauf
James Barr's enthralling tale is well told and even better researched as it takes us through the tortuous roads of colonial intrigue that finally releases the forces and tensions of the modern Middle East. The book depicts both Britain and France as the midwives of the state of Israel whose rivalries also gives birth to the grotesque and grissly monsters that has become today's Syria, Iraq and of course Palestine. Highly recommended to anyone who would like to understand the political and social dilemmas facing middle eastern politicians and populace would try to work for a lasting peace in the Region. If ever there is an expose of the thoroughly discredited policies of colonial conquest and rule, this book demonstrates it in an understated and thoroughly human way. Highly recommended
1 von 1 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
5.0 von 5 Sternen Great Book to Know the Present 26. Mai 2015
Von Ihab - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format: Taschenbuch
I am half way through the book. I am telling this book clear any ambiguity about what was happening in the middle east after the collapse of the Ottoman empire. And also it allowed me to rethink of what is going on currently in the middle east. One important chapter, if you will, summarize the whole conflict "The Pipelines"
4.0 von 5 Sternen I was looking for a book that could put the ... 22. Februar 2016
Von Thomas L Parrish - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format: Taschenbuch Verifizierter Kauf
I was looking for a book that could put the problems in the middle east in some kind of context, "A Line In The Sand" has done that for me. It is clear from the book that there are many factors that lead to this disfunction not the least of all is the rampant imperialism that existed in in the early 20th century.
6 von 9 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
5.0 von 5 Sternen A Line in the Sand. Britain, France and the Struggle That Shaped the Middle East. James Barr. 28. Januar 2013
Von Raymond Parsons - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format: Taschenbuch Verifizierter Kauf
I have already got a copy of this book & this edition.I bought a second one for my grandson

This is an excellent but complex account of events that followed the Paris Peace Conference in the Hall of Mirrors, at which the creation of the various countries after WW1 was implemented following the break up of the Ottoman Empire.

The chapters covering the Sykes-Picot agreement are well drafted. The book gets more complicated after that and is heavy going. It is not the best book I have read on the politics of the middle east, but it is still worthwhile.

The USA, Britain, France and all the other countries who invaded the Middle East should read this book. It explains the background and outlines the reasons for all the current wars in Iraq, Israel and the Arab world.

Lawrence of Arabia promised the Arabs their own country after the break up of the Ottoman Empire. They now hate the west because of being betrayed by the outcome of the Treaty of Versailles. We need to address the perceived injustices that have created Al Queda.

Unfortunately, as with Northern Ireland and the Israeli-Palestine conflict the West has tried to enforce their solutions on the Arabs. I fear matters have gone too far with the cascading of conflict down the generations.

I think this may lead to WW 3 with Al Queda.
Waren diese Rezensionen hilfreich? Wir wollen von Ihnen hören.