Facebook Twitter Pinterest <Einbetten>
  • Alle Preisangaben inkl. USt

Lesen Sie dieses Buch gratis mit Kindle Unlimited
Mit Kindle Unlimited dieses Buch auf allen Geräten gratis lesen und Millionen weitere Titel sowie Tausende Hörbücher entdecken.
Mit Kindle Unlimited dieses Buch auf allen Geräten gratis lesen und Millionen weitere Titel sowie Tausende Hörbücher entdecken.

Mit Kindle Unlimited dieses Buch auf allen Geräten gratis lesen und Millionen weitere Titel sowie Tausende Hörbücher entdecken. Mit der gratis Kindle-Leseapp überall lesen. Verfügbar für iOS, Android, Mac & Desktop
Nur noch 1 auf Lager (mehr ist unterwegs).
Verkauf und Versand durch Amazon. Geschenkverpackung verfügbar.

Um Adressen zu sehen, bitte
Bitte tragen Sie eine deutsche PLZ ein.
Gebraucht: Gut | Details
Verkauft von Warehouse Deals
Zustand: Gebraucht: Gut
Kommentar: Kleiner Schnitt oder Kratzer auf der Vorderseite. Kleine Falte oder kleiner Knick auf der Vorderseite. Kleiner Schnitt oder Kratzer auf der Rückseite. Kleine Falte oder kleiner Knick auf der Rückseite. Kleiner Schnitt oder Kratzer auf den Seiten. Mittlere Falte oder mittlerer Knick auf den Seiten. Amazon-Kundenservice und Rücknahmegarantie (bis zu 30 Tagen) bei jedem Kauf.
Möchten Sie verkaufen?
Zur Rückseite klappen Zur Vorderseite klappen
Hörprobe Wird gespielt... Angehalten   Sie hören eine Hörprobe des Audible Hörbuch-Downloads.
Mehr erfahren
Dieses Bild anzeigen

History: Fiction or Science? Chronology II (Englisch) Taschenbuch – 30. Juli 2005

4,5 von 5 Sternen
5 Sterne
4 Sterne
3 Sterne
2 Sterne
1 Stern
4,5 von 5 Sternen 16 Kundenrezensionen auf Amazon.com

Alle 2 Formate und Ausgaben anzeigen Andere Formate und Ausgaben ausblenden
Neu ab Gebraucht ab
Kindle Edition
"Bitte wiederholen"
"Bitte wiederholen"
EUR 36,99
EUR 29,98 EUR 19,10
10 neu ab EUR 29,98 5 gebraucht ab EUR 19,10
click to open popover

Wird oft zusammen gekauft

  • History: Fiction or Science? Chronology II
  • +
  • History: Fiction or Science? New Chronology I
  • +
  • History: Fiction or Science? Vol. 3: Astronomical Methods as Applied to Chronology. Ptolemy's Almagest. Chronology III
Gesamtpreis: EUR 133,97
Die ausgewählten Artikel zusammen kaufen

Es wird kein Kindle Gerät benötigt. Laden Sie eine der kostenlosen Kindle Apps herunter und beginnen Sie, Kindle-Bücher auf Ihrem Smartphone, Tablet und Computer zu lesen.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone

Geben Sie Ihre Mobiltelefonnummer ein, um die kostenfreie App zu beziehen.

Jeder kann Kindle Bücher lesen — selbst ohne ein Kindle-Gerät — mit der KOSTENFREIEN Kindle App für Smartphones, Tablets und Computer.




If you agree with Fomenko that Roman chronology is basically the foundation of the entire edifice of global chronology; you would also certainly agree that despite its numerous gaps and inconsistencies, Roman history is the best-documented field of ancient history, and thus a reference scale. But how well is the actual date of the Eternal City's foundation known? Firstly, Rome is supposed to have been founded by the Trojans who had to flee after the fall of Troy. Some claim Rome to have been founded by Aeneas and Ulysses shortly after Troy had fallen; others are of the opinion that there was an entire dynasty that ruled for 500 years between the fall of Troy and the foundation of Rome. Well, that's just an innocent 500 years long misunderstanding compared with what heretic Fomenko says, asserts, proves in his second volume: Second Roman Empire, Third Roman Empire, Biblical Kingdom of Israel, Biblical Kingdom of Judah, Holy Roman Empire are stories about basically same events, written from different points of view at different times. The underlying events have actually taken place during xii-xv cy. These histories have been written and perfected by multitude of highly talented humanist and clerical writers of xiii-xvi cy disguised as "ancients" with glorious names like Homer, Pluto, Thucydides etc..Chronology 2.0 beta.. Historians are kindly invited to report the bugs. (Poggio Bracciolini, Rome, Italy)

was somewhat astonished to see a preface concerned with compatibility of astronomy and history . Apparently, mediaeval and "ancient" chronicles refer to several spectacular solar eclipses accompaning the important events. The heavens validated thus the claim of the party that won the day and time-stampted it. Things celestial were in high demand in 16-17th cy, therefore the scolars "confirmed" ancient events with a remarkable astronomical phenomena; their learned astrology friends furnished an "exact" dating for vanity eclipse. This had been the prevailing agenda in the correspondence between the founding father of chronology Joseph Scaliger, a Jesuit, and Johannes Kepler, a fellow Jesuit and the founding father of astronomy. All this "science" had been approximate, and calculated dates scholastic and arbitrary, the reason being that both the model and data were way too crude. The Apollo missions would have missed the Moon if their trajectory calculation had been based on the Earth-Moon model of the XVI-XVII century. The astronomers knew about lunar tidal friction already in XVIII century, but could not calculate it. In the XVIII-XIX century they tried to use it for calculating "historical" data, coming up with a horrendous mess as a result. Actually, to make valid reverse calculations of solar eclipses giving precise time, place, phase and duration one needs an atomic clock, a laser, a satellite, a computer and a special software suite. Moreover, such calculations can only be reliable if the Earth-Moon system is stable during the period of research. Fomenko presumes it stable until proven contrary. Once properly recalculated with the aid of modern computers and software, all the "ancient" eclipses turn out to be mediaeval - or fake. In this volume Fomenko gives his final analysis of the eclipse tried described by Thucydides, dating them to 1039,1046 and 1057 AD, discovers the layered structure of this extremely rare authentic mediaeval manuscript, and att (Peter A. Cunningham (Oxford, UK))


Asserts that most of 'World History' is a fiction! Learn how and why Ancient Rome, Greece and Egypt were invented and crafted during Renaissance. Discover the Old Testament as a veiled rendition of events of Middle Ages written centuries after the New Testament. Perceive the Crusaders as contemporaries of The Crucifixion punishing the tormentors of the Messiah. What if Jesus Christ was born in 1053 and crucified in 1086 AD? Sounds unbelievable! Not after you've read this book by Anatoly Fomenko, a leading mathematician of our time. He follows in the steps of Sir Isaac Newton, finds clear evidence of falsification of History by medieval clergy and humanists. Armed with computers, astronomy and statistics he proves the history of humankind to be both dramatically different and drastically shorter than generally presumed. Archaeological, dendrochronological, paleographical and carbon methods of dating of ancient sources and artifacts are both non-exact and contradictory, therefore there is not a single piece of firm written evidence or artifact that could be reliably and independently dated earlier than the eleventh century.

Alle Produktbeschreibungen


Es gibt noch keine Kundenrezensionen auf Amazon.de
5 Sterne
4 Sterne
3 Sterne
2 Sterne
1 Stern

Die hilfreichsten Kundenrezensionen auf Amazon.com (beta) (Kann Kundenrezensionen aus dem "Early Reviewer Rewards"-Programm beinhalten)

Amazon.com: 4.5 von 5 Sternen 16 Rezensionen
2 von 2 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
5.0 von 5 Sternen History knowledge is no good for this book 17. Februar 2017
Von Lululexii - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format: Taschenbuch Verifizierter Kauf
Very dense. You really have to know your stuff to get through this book. Honestly, if you can read this book and understand it from a math standpoint, well then you are set. History knowledge is no good for this book. Fomenko's whole theory is based on astronomy, the movement of the moon, gravitational forces, gravitational pulls, etc.. Fomenko uses mathematics to explain inconsistencies! So if you know at least something about math and science, enough to understand the fundamental workings of space, well then this book is for you. It is not really for "history buffs" since they are the first to cry malarky! presumably, because they don't get the science behind it. It is not a dig, that's just not the field they are in. Besides, imagine spending your life learning history just to be told you are wrong - doesn't sit well with some people. The book is supposed to be thought provoking. Fomenko is not claiming he is right in any way, he is presenting patterns and inconsistencies in history that he started studying after trying to compute coefficient D in the theory of Lunar Motion when he was studying celestial mechanics. He needed the dates of ancient eclipses, for which he used historical documents to figure out. He found a leap in the interval of the 5th to 10th century. That is how the chronicles begin. The guy wrote 7 books about the subject and spent decades researching the topics, so I am sorry, but to disprove his claims, you also have to approach it from a math/ science standpoint. There is so much information in this book, that it might take the smartest person years to dig through. So again, if you have an open mind and want to look at history through the math/science lens, then this book is definitely for you!
1 von 1 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
5.0 von 5 Sternen Answers beg questions 15. April 2017
Von Angelyn Ray - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format: Taschenbuch Verifizierter Kauf
Reviews have been written. This post details my impressions after reading Volumes I and II.

Fomenko's research does not in fact provide a new understanding of history for me, a new veil to adopt as reality. Rather, it pulls aside the old veil of "established" history and leaves a breathtaking open field. In that openness, with the veil which has heretofore served as reality, ripped aside, there are questions begging for answers. What DID happen before the XVI-XIX centuries (possibly - and I hope - to be answered in other of his texts, such as that regarding Russian Tartary or the problems of Chronology)?

A more fundamental question to be answered is, if we have been so easily duped by numbers - in this case, dates - what else are we being duped about? What is the next veil to be pulled aside? What is the nature of time? Einstein is quoted, "... us physicists believe the separation between past, present, and future is only an illusion, although a convincing one."

Fomenko's work provides answers that lead to more questions. The journey is stimulating. Enlightening, too, but as we move, as it were, we pass under one streetlight into the night. What is the next streetlight that will show the ground beneath our feet and hasten us further on our journey?

Since we're talking here about chronology, my mind turns to the mythical "Chronos," which may represent the reality of time as we experience it, the fourth dimension. Meanwhile, perhaps "Kronus" is the counterfeit, the falsification. Fomenko points toward the reality and exposes the falsification. Perhaps the "real" cannot be expressed in words; however, the false can be identified and exposed, thus furthering the quest. I welcome any such furtherance.
2 von 2 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
5.0 von 5 Sternen com using the tools of predictive linguistics that he has developed over the past decades said that all the great religions will 14. Februar 2017
Von Clement Malecki - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format: Taschenbuch Verifizierter Kauf
I'll do a more complete review later as i'm still working through the volumes that have been translated into English. Clif High is a recent posting at Half Past Human .com using the tools of predictive linguistics that he has developed over the past decades said that all the great religions will implode over the next decade. I suspect he thinks that the new Russian inter-disciplinary criticism as exemplified by Fomenko and his colleagues will be a major factor in over-throwing the system of lies and mind control the elites have used to enslave humanity. It seems that there are no extant records from the past earlier than the X century A.D. and that entire Classical Age is actually events from the Medieval period that were transposed to a thousand or more years earlier to an age that only exists in works that were created during the Italian renaissance and later. I am presently immersed in this wild ride and highly recommend these works for your immense delectation...
22 von 23 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
4.0 von 5 Sternen Something of a disappointment 8. September 2005
Von J. wensink - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format: Taschenbuch Verifizierter Kauf
After having read the first volume of this expected series of 7 volumes I was triggered by the thesis of these authors that ancient Greek and Roman history did in fact take place in the Middle Ages. So I started studying medieval history of the Middle East - also known as Islamic history - to find out if the opponents of the ancient Greeks and Romans - the Acheamenid Persians, Sassanids, Scythians, Egyptians, etc. - also have their duplicates in medieval history. My search was disappointing: none of the many medieval Islamic dynasties seemed to correspond to the ancient middle eastern rulers.

However, I did find a close correspondence between Herodotus' Persian kings and medieval events:

- the defeat and capture of an Anatolian king - the Lydian Croesus - by the Persian conqueror Cyrus is identical to the defeat and capture of another Anatolian king - sultan Bayezid - by the Asian/Mongol conqueror Tamerlane;

- the Persian conquest of Egypt by the cruel tyrant Cambyses reds almost exactly as the Ottoman conquest of Egypt by Selim the Grim (note the nickname!);

- Darius the Lawgiver of the Persian Empire looks very much alike to Sulayman the Magnificent, the Lawgiver in Islamic history;

- Xerxes, whose main claim to fame is to be defeated by the Greeks at the naval battle of Salamis, looks like Selim II (the Sot) whose main claim to fame is to be defeated by a Spanish-Italian alliance at the naval battle of Lepanto.

I should have expected Fomenko et al. to arrive at similar conclusions, however, they claim that the Persian kings are the alter egos of the Angevin kings of Sicily whose biographies do not contain the exploits of the Persian kings.

The similiarities I indicate lead to the conclusion that Herodotus must have written his Histories at the close of the 16th century. But this is extremely late, given that Herodotus is "the Father of History", so therefore all other "ancient" histories must have been fabricated even later. Yet, the founders of modern chronology - Scaliger and Petavius - laid their foundations also at the close of the 16th century and had the full corpus of ancient histories already at their disposal.

It seems to me that Fomenko has to address these inconsistencies, maybe in the forthcoming 5 volumes?

Another critique of their book is that the correspondencies between different rulers are often based on a superficial comparison of the biographies; upon a more thorough comparison many details appear that do not correspond at all.

Finally, the authors rely heavily on the works of Gregorovius (1821-1891!!) - his medieval histories of Rome and Athens - as the source of medieval history; these works are - at least in the West - hoplessly outdated and have been superceded by more up-to-date works (for instance, Julius Norwich's trilogy on Byzantine history is not even cited).
5.0 von 5 Sternen Five Stars 8. November 2015
Von Milan Strbac - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format: Taschenbuch Verifizierter Kauf
Excellent and shocking!
Waren diese Rezensionen hilfreich? Wir wollen von Ihnen hören.