OK, the 64 is great for gaming and mining, I just mean that despite being fantastic for gaming, it is not my best choice for mining. Instead, I would choose its predecessor 56 for mining, which is cheaper. The 64, to hash more than the 56 as expected, consumes a considerable extra amount of energy juice, it is a thirsty card, so to run it under reasonable consumption per hash, I ended by underclocking it to run as a 56.
If you like overclocking and you don't care about consumption but just looking for the highest hashrate possible, 64 might be a good option for you - but I must also add that my experience with different brands of 64s brought better results. Comparing to its competitors, seems like Gigabyte could make an amazing 56 but not as good 64.
@AMAZON: shipping this product without an external packaging was a terrible idea. I got that box from the picture with a destination label glued on it, and taped around it. The small problem is to have the original box damaged (and it is!); but the biggest concern, especially for such expensive item, is to hide the content and avoid potential robbery once it is exposed.
| Marke | Gigabyte |
|---|---|
| Hersteller | Gigabyte |
| Modell/Serie | GIGABYTE GV-RXVEGA64GAMING OC-8GD |
| Produktabmessungen | 27.4 x 13.2 x 5.3 cm; 1 Kilogramm |
| Modellnummer | GV-RXVEGA64GAMING OC-8GD |
| Auslaufartikel (Produktion durch Hersteller eingestellt) | Nein |
| Farbe | Schwarz |
| Prozessorgeschwindigkeit | 1.3 GHz |
| Prozessorkerne | 1 |
| Größe Festplatte | 8000 GB |
| Grafik-Coprozessor | AMD |
| Chipsatzhersteller | AMD |
| Beschreibung Grafikkarte | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Gaming OC 8G |
| Grafikkartenspeicher | GDDR5 |
| Speichergröße Grafikkarte | 8000 MB |
| Interface Grafikkarte | PCI-E |
| Watt | 750 Watt |
| Batterien enthalten | Nein |
| Artikelgewicht | 1 kg |
