Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet or computer – no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Safety and product resources
Issue loading the information
- Product safety imagesManufacturer informationResponsible person
Issue loading the information
Issue loading the information
Issue loading the information
Coming Apart: The State of White America, 1960-2010 Paperback – Illustrated, 29 Jan. 2013
Purchase options and add-ons
“I’ll be shocked if there’s another book that so compellingly describes the most important trends in American society.”—David Brooks, New York Times
In Coming Apart, Charles Murray explores the formation of American classes that are different in kind from anything we have ever known, focusing on whites as a way of driving home the fact that the trends he describes do not break along lines of race or ethnicity.
Drawing on five decades of statistics and research, Coming Apart demonstrates that a new upper class and a new lower class have diverged so far in core behaviors and values that they barely recognize their underlying American kinship—divergence that has nothing to do with income inequality and that has grown during good economic times and bad.
The top and bottom of white America increasingly live in different cultures, Murray argues, with the powerful upper class living in enclaves surrounded by their own kind, ignorant about life in mainstream America, and the lower class suffering from erosions of family and community life that strike at the heart of the pursuit of happiness. That divergence puts the success of the American project at risk.
The evidence in Coming Apart is about white America. Its message is about all of America.
- Print length432 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherRandom House Publishing Group
- Publication date29 Jan. 2013
- Dimensions13.18 x 2.29 x 20.22 cm
- ISBN-10030745343X
- ISBN-13978-0307453433
Popular titles by this author
Human Diversity: The Biology of Gender, Race, and ClassHardcoverOnly 18 left in stock (more on the way).
Safety and product resources
Issue loading the information
- Product safety imagesManufacturer informationResponsible person
Issue loading the information
Issue loading the information
Issue loading the information
Product description
Review
“Coming Apart brims with ideas about what ails America."—The Economist
“A timely investigation into a worsening class divide no one can afford to ignore.”—Publishers Weekly
“[Charles Murray] argues for the need to focus on what has made the U.S. exceptional beyond its wealth and military power . . . religion, marriage, industriousness, and morality.”—Booklist (starred review)
“[Charles Murray] has written an incisive, alarming, and hugely frustrating book about the state of American society.”—Roger Lowenstein, Bloomberg Businessweek
About the Author
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
Our Kind of People
In which is described the emergence of a new and distinctive culture among a highly influential segment of American society.
ON SEPTEMBER 29, 1987, ABC premiered an hour-long dramatic series with the cryptic title thirtysomething. The opening scene is set in a bar. Not a Cheers bar, where Cliff the mailman perches on a bar stool alongside Norm the accountant and Frasier the psychiatrist, but an airy room, perhaps attached to a restaurant, with sunlight streaming in through paned windows onto off-white walls.
The room is crowded with an upscale clientele gathered for drinks after work, nattily uniformed servers moving among them. Two women in their late twenties or early thirties wearing tailored business outfits are seated at a table. A vase with a minimalist arrangement of irises and forsythia is visible in the background. On the table in front of the women are their drinks- both of them wine, served in classic long-stemmed glasses. Nary a peanut or a pretzel is in sight. One of the women is talking about a man she has started dating. He is attractive, funny, good in bed, she says, but there's a problem: He wears polyester shirts. "Am I allowed to have a relationship with someone who wears polyester shirts?" she asks.
She is Hope Murdoch, the female protagonist. She ends up marrying the man who wore the polyester shirts, who is sartorially correct by the time we see him. Hope went to Princeton. She is a writer who put a promising career on hold when she had a baby. He is Michael Steadman, one of two partners in a fledgling advertising agency in Philadelphia. He went to the University of Pennsylvania (the Ivy League one). Hope and Michael live with their seven-month-old daughter in an apartment with high ceilings, old-fashioned woodwork, and etched-glass windows. Grad-school-like bookcases are untidily crammed with books. An Art Deco poster is on the wall. A Native American blanket is draped over the top of the sofa.
In the remaining forty-five minutes, we get dialogue that includes a reference to left brain/right brain differences and an exchange about evolutionary sexual selection that begins, "You've got a bunch of Australopithecines out on the savanna, right?" The Steadmans buy a $278 baby stroller (1987 dollars). Michael shops for new backpacking gear at a high-end outdoors store, probably REI. No one wears suits at the office. Michael's best friend is a professor at Haverford. Hope breast-feeds her baby in a fashionable restaurant. Hope can't find a babysitter. Three of the four candidates she interviews are too stupid to be left with her child and the other is too Teutonic. Hope refuses to spend a night away from the baby ("I have to be available to her all the time"). Michael drives a car so cool that I couldn't identify the make. All this, in just the first episode.
The culture depicted in thirtysomething had no precedent, with its characters who were educated at elite schools, who discussed intellectually esoteric subjects, and whose sex lives were emotionally complicated and therefore needed to be talked about. The male leads in thirtysomething were on their way up through flair and creativity, not by being organization men. The female leads were conflicted about motherhood and yet obsessively devoted to being state-of-the-art moms. The characters all possessed a sensibility that shuddered equally at Fords and Cadillacs, ranch homes in the suburbs and ponderous mansions, Budweiser and Chivas Regal.
In the years to come, America would get other glimpses of this culture in Mad About You, Ally McBeal, Frasier, and The West Wing, among others, but no show ever focused with the same laser intensity on the culture that thirtysomething depicted-understandably, because the people who live in that culture do not make up much of the audience for network television series, and those who are the core demographic for network television series are not particularly fond of the culture that thirtysomething portrayed. It was the emerging culture of the new upper class.
Let us once again return to November 21, 1963, and try to find its counterpart.
The Baseline
The World of the Upper-Middle Class
Two conditions have to be met before a subculture can spring up within a mainstream culture. First, a sufficient number of people have to possess a distinctive set of tastes and preferences. Second, they have to be able to get together and form a critical mass large enough to shape the local scene. The Amish have managed to do it by achieving local dominance in selected rural areas. In 1963, other kinds of subcultures also existed in parts of the country. Then as now, America's major cities had distinctive urban styles, and so did regions such as Southern California, the Midwest, and the South. But in 1963 there was still no critical mass of the people who would later be called symbolic analysts, the educated class, the creative class, or the cognitive elite.
In the first place, not enough people had college educations to form a critical mass of people with the distinctive tastes and preferences fostered by advanced education. In the American adult population as a whole, just 8 percent had college degrees. Even in neighborhoods filled with managers and professionals, people with college degrees were a minority- just 32 percent of people in those jobs had college degrees in 1963. Only a dozen census tracts in the entire nation had adult populations in which more than 50 percent of the adults had college degrees, and all of them were on or near college campuses.
In the second place, affluence in 1963 meant enough money to afford a somewhat higher standard of living than other people, not a markedly different lifestyle. In 1963, the median family income of people working in managerial occupations and the professions was only $61,500 (2010 dollars, as are all dollar figures from now on). Fewer than 5 percent of American families in 1963 had incomes of $100,000 or more, and fewer than half of 1 percent had incomes of $200,000 or more.
Product details
- Publisher : Random House Publishing Group; reprint edition (29 Jan. 2013)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 432 pages
- ISBN-10 : 030745343X
- ISBN-13 : 978-0307453433
- Dimensions : 13.18 x 2.29 x 20.22 cm
- Best Sellers Rank: 675,559 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- 2,630 in United States History (Books)
- 12,642 in Sociology Reference
- 253,377 in Foreign Language Books
- Customer reviews:
About the author

Charles Murray is a political scientist, author, and libertarian. He first came to national attention in 1984 with the publication of "Losing Ground," which has been credited as the intellectual foundation for the Welfare Reform Act of 1996. His 1994 New York Times bestseller, "The Bell Curve" (Free Press, 1994), coauthored with the late Richard J. Herrnstein, sparked heated controversy for its analysis of the role of IQ in shaping America's class structure. Murray's other books include "What It Means to Be a Libertarian" (1997), "Human Accomplishment" (2003), "In Our Hands" (2006), and "Real Education" (2008). His 2012 book, "Coming Apart" (Crown Forum, 2012), describes an unprecedented divergence in American classes over the last half century. His most recent book is "By the People: Rebuilding Liberty Without Permission" (Crown Forum, 2015).
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings, help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyses reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from Germany
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
-
Reviewed in Germany on 6 May 2017Obwohl bereits vor 2012 geschrieben liest sich das Buch wie eine Erklärung all der Dinge, die zwingend zur Wahl von Trump führen musste.
Die Sprache ist sehr klar und einfach zu lesen. Er baut ein Argument langsam, aber zielstrebig auf. Fachbegriffe kommen sehr selten vor, und wenn, werden sie gut erklärt. Grafiken werden sparsam gezeigt, und sind aber jedesmal sehr sorgfältig ausgewählt und gestaltet.
Eine immens sorgfältige wissenschaftiche Arbeit, die ebenso sorgfältig vorgetragen wird.
-
Reviewed in Germany on 15 June 2021Eine soziologische Studie von Charles Murray, die sich mit dem zunehmenden Auseinanderdriften der weißen US-amerikanischen "New Lower Class" und "New Upper Class" in den Jahren 1960 bis 2010 auseinandersetzt. Auf eine Detailbetrachtung weiterer soziologischer Klassen verzichtet der Verfasser.
Die Unterschiede zwischen den beiden von ihm betrachteten Klassen zeigen sich in einem gravierenden Bildungs- und Einkommensgefälle. Daraus entwickelten sich mit der Zeit sehr unterschiedliche gesellschaftliche Lebenswelten ohne große gemeinsame Schnittmengen. Man könnte darin eine Art landesinternen „Clash of Cultures“ sehen. Die daraus resultierenden Konflikte waren anfänglich ohne große Bedeutung. Sie nahmen aber durch den wachsenden politischen Einfluss der "New Upper Class" in Regierungsverantwortung an Brisanz zu, da sie ihre Vorstellungen zur moralisch gültigen Norm erklärten. Sie entsprachen aber nicht dem Alltag der „New Lower Class“. Dadurch entfremdete sich die "New Lower Class" zunehmend von der politischen Elite, was zu einer emotional aufgeladenen Spaltung der Gesellschaft führte, wie sie bei den Anhängern und Gegnern Trumps zu beobachten war. Trump hatte sich zum Fürsprecher der "New Lower Class" gemacht, ohne ihr anzugehören, war aber von ihr gewählt worden.
Insgesamt eine exzellente Analyse der gesellschaftlichen Entwicklung zwischen 1960 und 2010, die zum Verständnis Trumps politischer Erfolge und der aktuellen US-amerikanischen Politik beiträgt. Die Beschreibung der möglichen Lösungen, um die gesellschaftliche Spaltung zu überwinden, tritt bei der Analyse leider etwas in den Hintergrund.
- Reviewed in Germany on 8 April 2013At some point it is just numbers and charts; yet this is a beautiful book depicting the alienation of the elite class and what it can be done about it.
-
Reviewed in Germany on 31 December 2017Analyse van de basis elementen voor een gelukkig en zinvol leven. Aannemelijke storyline over ontstaan van nieuwe klassemaatschappij. Veel nuttige punten van discussie over hoe nu verder.
Top reviews from other countries
pbReviewed in India on 16 August 20245.0 out of 5 stars awesome !!
-
Marcelo CostaReviewed in Brazil on 14 August 20211.0 out of 5 stars Preço muito alto pela qualidade do papel e impressao
O papel e impressão do livro são muito ruins
O papel e impressão do livro são muito ruins1.0 out of 5 stars Preço muito alto pela qualidade do papel e impressao
Marcelo Costa
Reviewed in Brazil on 14 August 2021
Images in this review
Fernando RobledoReviewed in Spain on 23 June 20215.0 out of 5 stars Highly recommended
Excellent
-
CATReviewed in France on 11 January 20205.0 out of 5 stars très éclairant
décrit et analyse la divergence de culture et de résultats des classes "populaire" et "moyenne supérieure" aux USA. Un livre équivalent reste à écrire sur la France.
Mick McManusReviewed in Australia on 10 October 20235.0 out of 5 stars A DECADE ON AND COMING APART STILL RESONATES
I have just read ‘Coming Apart” a decade after it was first published. It’s storyline is probably more relevant today than 2012/13. Australia is experiencing the same disintegration of the family, the Church, and society in general. Even our national broadcaster has lost the trust of a broad cross section of society. The primacy of ones personal conscience has supercharge secularism and may be our ultimate demise. Charles Murray makes us think about how 2000 years of Judeo-christian values have delivered us this far, but what will deliver a prosperous future.


