From Library Journal
In her first book, Jacobs (English, Univ. of Colorado, Boulder) expands on a new area of interpreting Modernist literature. She analyzes the act of viewing in Modernist texts. Using examples from Virginia Woolf, Maurice Blanchot, and others, she demonstrates how this movement is unique in its distrust of omniscient narrators. Jacobs examines contemporary innovations photography and film, anthropological and sociological observation techniques, and psychoanalysis and "skeptical philosophy" and illustrates how they affected the selected texts. Her selections from U.S., British, and French writing, both literary and nonliterary, are unconventional, and her argument for choosing them is not thoroughly expressed. The book is well researched, with extensive notes, but the writing is uneven. While the discussion of the selected texts is clear and thoughtful, the introduction is dense and indirect. Recommended only for academic libraries. Paolina Taglienti, Long Island Univ., Brooklyn, NY
Copyright 2001 Reed Business Information, Inc.
Synopsis
This text challenges our understanding of modernist literature by showing how changing visual discourse, techniques and technologies affected the novels of that period. In readings that bring philosophies of vision into dialogue with photography and film as well as the methods of observation used by the social sciences, Karen Jacobs identifies distinctly modernist kinds of observers and visual relationships. This reconception of modernism draws upon American, British and French literary and extra-literary materials from the period 1900-1955. These texts share a sense of crisis about vision's capacity for violence and its inability to deliver reliable knowledge. Jacobs looks closely at the ways in which historical understanding of race- and gender-inflected visual relations in the modernist novel. She shows how modernist writers, increasingly aware of the body behind the neutral lens of the observer, used diverse strategies to displace the embodiment onto those "others" historically perceived as cultural bodies in order to reimagine for themselves or their characters a "purified" gaze.
The study addresses works by such high modernists as Vladimir Nabokov, Virginia Woolf and (more distantly) Ralph Ellison and Maurice Blanchot, as well as those by Henry James, Zora Neale Hurston and Nathanael West which have been tentatively placed in the modernist canon although they forgo the full-blown experimental techniques often seen as synonymous with literary modernism. Jacobs reframes fundamental debates about modernist aesthetic practices by demonstrating how much those practices are indebted to the chaning visual cultures of the 20th century.
