4 Angebote ab EUR 2,74

Möchten Sie verkaufen? Hier verkaufen
 
 
Three Men in a Boat: To Say Nothing of the Dog
 
 

Three Men in a Boat: To Say Nothing of the Dog (Taschenbuch)

von Jerome K. Jerome (Autor)
4.4 von 5 Sternen  Alle Rezensionen anzeigen (11 Kundenrezensionen)

Erhältlich bei diesen Anbietern.


3 gebraucht ab EUR 2,74 1 Sammlerstück(e) ab EUR 4,95

Kunden, die diesen Artikel gekauft haben, kauften auch


Produktinformation

  • Taschenbuch: 256 Seiten
  • Verlag: Tor Books; Auflage: Complete and. (Oktober 2001)
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • ISBN-10: 0765341611
  • ISBN-13: 978-0765341617
  • Größe und/oder Gewicht: 17 x 10,6 x 2 cm
  • Durchschnittliche Kundenbewertung: 4.4 von 5 Sternen  Alle Rezensionen anzeigen (11 Kundenrezensionen)
  • Amazon.de Verkaufsrang: Nr. 158.921 in Englische Bücher (Die Bestseller Englische Bücher)

Produktbeschreibungen

Kurzbeschreibung

Described as }Men Behaving Badly{ in Victorian London, this new edition of Jerome's classic features an introduction by comic novelist and TV dramatist Nigel Williams. -- Dieser Text bezieht sich auf eine andere Ausgabe: Gebundene Ausgabe .

Leseprobe. Abdruck erfolgt mit freundlicher Genehmigung der Rechteinhaber. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.

Chapter I
 
 
Three Invalids—Sufferings of George and Harris.—A victim to one hundred and seven fatal maladies.—Useful prescriptions.—Cure for liver complaint in children.—We agree that we are overworked and need rest.—A week on the rolling deep?—George suggests the River.—Montmorency lodges an objection.—Original motion carried by majority of three to one.
* * *
There were four of us—George, an William Samuel Harris, and myself, and Montmorency. We were sitting in my room, smoking and talking about how bad we were—bad from a medical point of view I mean, of course.
We were all feeling seedy, and we were getting quite nervous about it. Harris said he felt such extraordinary fits of giddiness come over him at times, that he hardly knew what he was doing; and then George said that he had fits of giddiness, too, and hardly knew what he was doing. With me, it was my liver that was out of order. I knew it was my liver that was out of order, because I had just been reading a patent liver-pill circular, in which were detailed the various symptoms by which a man could tell when his liver was out of order. I had them all.
It is a most extraordinary thing, but I never read a patent medicine advertisement without being impelled to the conclusion that I am suffering from the particular disease therein dealt with in its most virulent form. The diagnosis seems in every case to correspond exactly with all the sensations that I have ever felt.
I remember going to the British Museum one day to read up the treatment for some slight ailment of which I had a touch—hay fever, I fancy it was. I got down the book, and read all I came to read; and then, in an unthinking moment, I idly turned the leaves, and began to indolently study diseases generally. I forgot which was the first distemper I plunged into—some fearful, devastating scourge, I know-and, before I had glanced half down the list of “premonitory symptoms,” it was borne in upon me that I had fairly got it.
I sat for awhile, frozen with horror; and then, in the listlessness of despair, I again turned over the pages. I came to typhoid fever—read the symptoms—discovered that I had typhoid fever, must have had it for months—without knowing it—wondered what else I had got; turned up St. Vitus’ dance—found, as I expected, that I had that too—began to get interested in my case, and determined to sift it to the bottom, and so started alphabetically—read up ague, and learned that I was sickening for it, and that the acute stage would commence in about another fortnight. Bright’s disease, I was relieved to find, I had only in a modified form, and, so far as that was concerned, I might live for years. Cholera I had, with severe complications; and diphtheria I seemed to have been born with. I plodded conscientiously through the twenty-six letters, and the only malady I could conclude I had not got was house-maid’s knee.
I felt rather hurt about this at first; it seemed somehow to be a sort of slight. Why hadn’t I got house-maid’s knee? Why this invidious reservation? After awhile, however, less grasping feelings prevailed. I reflected that I had every other known malady in the pharmacology, and I grew less selfish, and determined to do without house-maid’s knee. Gout, in its most malignant stage, it would appear, had seized me without my being aware of it; and zymosis I had evidently been suffering with from boyhood. There were no more diseases after zymosis, so I concluded there was nothing else the matter with me.
I sat and pondered. I thought what an interesting case I must be from a medical point of view, what an acquisition I should be to a class! Students would have no need to “walk the hospitals,” if they had me. I was a hospital in myself. All they need do would be to walk round me, and, after that, take their diploma.
Then I wondered how long I had to live. I tried to examine myself. I felt my pulse. I could not at first feel any pulse at all. Then, all of a sudden, it seemed to start off. I pulled out my watch and timed it. I made it a hundred and forty-seven to the minute. I tried to feel my heart. I could not feel my heart. I had stopped beating. I have since been induced to come to the opinion that it must have been there all the time, and must have been beating, but I cannot account for it. I patted myself all over my front, from what I call my waist up to my head, and I went a bit round each side, and a little way up the back. But I could not feel or hear anything. I tried to look at my tongue. I stuck it out as far as ever it would go, and shut one eye, and tried to examine it with the other. I could only see the tip, and the only thing that I could gain from that was to feel more certain than before that I had scarlet fever.
I had walked into that reading-room a happy, healthy man. I crawled out a decrepit wreck.
I went to my medical man. He is an old chum of mine, and feels my pulse, and looks at my tongue, and talks about the weather all for nothing, when I fancy I’m ill; so I thought I would do him a good turn by going to him now. “What a doctor wants,” I said, “is practice. He shall have me. He will get more practice out of me than out of seventeen hundred of your ordinary, commonplace patients, with only one or two diseases each.” So I went straight up and saw him, and he said:
“Well, what’s the matter with you?”
I said:
“I will not take up your time, dear boy, with telling you what is the matter with me. Life is brief, and you might pass away before I had finished. But I will tell you what is not the matter with me. I have not got house-maid’s knee. Why I have not got house-maid’s knee, I cannot tell you; but the fact remains that I have not got it. Everything else, however, I have got.”
And I told him how I came to discover it all.
Then he opened me and looked down me, and clutched hold of my wrist, and then he hit me over the chest when I wasn’t expecting it—a cowardly thing to do, I call it—and immediately afterward butted me with the side of his head. After that, he sat down and wrote out a prescription, and folded it up and gave it me, and I put it in my pocket and went out.
I did not open it. I took it to the nearest chemist’s, and handed it in. The man read it, and then handed it back.
He said he didn’t keep it.
I said:
“You are a chemist?”
He said:
“I am a chemist. If I was a co-operative store and family hotel combined, I might be able to oblige you. Being only a chemist hampers me.”
I read the prescription. It ran:
* * *
“1 lb. beefsteak, with
1 pt. bitter beer
every 6 hours.
1 ten-mile walk every morning.
1 bed at 11 sharp every night.
* * *
And don’t stuff up your head with things you don’t understand.”
I followed the directions, with the happy result—speaking for myself—that my life was preserved, and is still going on.
In the present instance, going back to the liver-pill circular, I had the symptoms, beyond all mistake, the chief among them being “a general disinclination to work of any kind.”
What I suffer in that way no tongue can tell. From my earliest infancy I have been a martyr to it. As a boy, the disease hardly ever left me for a day. They did not know, then, that it was my liver. Medical science was in a far less advanced state than now, and they used to put it down to laziness.
“Why, you skulking little devil, you,” they would say, “get up and do something for your living, can’t you?”—not knowing, of course, that I was ill.
And...

In diesem Buch (Mehr dazu)
Nach einer anderen Ausgabe dieses Buches suchen.
Mehr entdecken
Wortanzeiger
Ausgewählte Seiten ansehen
Buchdeckel | Copyright | Auszug | Rückseite
Hier reinlesen und suchen:

Tags

 (Was ist das?)
Bei einem Tag handelt es sich um ein Schlagwort, das zum Produkt passt.
Tags erleichtern allen Kunden die Suche und die Sortierung ihrer Lieblingsprodukte.
 

 

Kundenrezensionen

11 Rezensionen
5 Sterne:
 (7)
4 Sterne:
 (3)
3 Sterne:    (0)
2 Sterne:    (0)
1 Sterne:
 (1)
 
 
 
 
 
Durchschnittliche Kundenbewertung
4.4 von 5 Sternen (11 Kundenrezensionen)
 
 
 
 
Sagen Sie Ihre Meinung zu diesem Artikel:
Die hilfreichsten Kundenrezensionen

 
5 von 5 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich:
4.0 von 5 Sternen Funny observational humor, 25. November 1999
Von Walter Flaschka (Oxford, MS USA) - Alle meine Rezensionen ansehen
(REAL NAME)   
Humor is very hard to write. Jerome K. Jerome does a fine job in his "Three Men in a Boat" -- it's a light, frothy sort of humor that brings to mind a 60's comedy movie. The characters are irritable and inept, and the things that tick them off (packing luggage, setting up a tent, dealing with women in nature, cooperative rowing) are still very relevant today. For example, people who hate jet-skis can find parallel rants on the steam-powered launches that annoy Jerome and his sailing buddies.

The occasional dips into seriousness (English history, a single-mother suicide) take up a net 2 pages total, and don't happen to detract from the overall humor. My favorite line is spoken by Jerome to the overzealous cemetary watchman, who can't believe Jerome doesn't want to view some open tombs: "Leave me immediately or I shall climb over the fence and slay you."

The book gets 4 stars only because (like most observational humor) it leaves the mind easily, and doesn't display the unity of meaning, humor and characterization that modern readers expect from a 5 star book. This book is an excellent series of hilarious essays loosely strung together in the form of flashbacks, but it is not a novel per se. One of its greatest achievements is that it is still readable today, quite accessible to a modern audience.

Helfen Sie anderen Kunden bei der Suche nach den hilfreichsten Rezensionen  
War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich? Ja Nein


 
2 von 2 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich:
5.0 von 5 Sternen Funniest book in the English language, 21. Juli 1999
My mother wasn't much for reading, and this is the only book she ever bought me, having loved it herself as a child in the 1930s. I must have read it a dozen times, and every time it literally brings tears to my eyes. Which is no small feat. Those who find the book "too old" (!) might like to try Bill Bryson's Notes from a Small Island. You'll immediately see the kinship across the years.
Helfen Sie anderen Kunden bei der Suche nach den hilfreichsten Rezensionen  
War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich? Ja Nein


 
1 von 1 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich:
5.0 von 5 Sternen If a book can be perfect, this would be it., 1. Oktober 1999
Tremendous amount of humor, hilarity, warmth, generosity, travails and triumphs both domestic and while travelling - this book has it all. It will make you weep with laughter. (I've always been partial to the scene with the canned peaches.)Jerome is one of those now-forgotten Victorian British writers whose names should actually be inscribed in gold on library walls.

I would advise this book to anyone above the age of 12 with an even modest sense of humor. It is a tremendous antidote to the curse of modernity, which encourages us to believe that anyone alive in any period before this one must be hopelessly dull, boring, and have nothing to teach or share with us.

Helfen Sie anderen Kunden bei der Suche nach den hilfreichsten Rezensionen  
War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich? Ja Nein

Sagen Sie Ihre Meinung zu diesem Artikel: Eigene Rezension erstellen
 
 
 
Die neuesten Kundenrezensionen

1.0 von 5 Sternen not mine
I can only tell that this kind of humor is special. So, if you notice that this kind of humor is not yours stop reading because you might get bored. If it is, well, you'll laugh.
Am 22. Mai 2000 veröffentlicht

4.0 von 5 Sternen have read his other work - a wonder
Perhaps I break the rules, having not read the book, but I know the praise all too well. I found Jerome's "Idle Thoughts of and Idle Fellow" in a box of discarded... Lesen Sie weiter...
Am 5. August 1999 veröffentlicht

5.0 von 5 Sternen It will make your sides ache
I read this book at least five times and will read it again. My favourite episodes are those related to Uncle Podgers, one of the most comic characters in English fiction after... Lesen Sie weiter...
Am 9. Juli 1999 veröffentlicht

5.0 von 5 Sternen A book I will re-read frequently!! I love it.
This has to be the most consistently funny book I have ever read. Jerome's writing style is a mix of Twain, Wodehouse and Austen. Lesen Sie weiter...
Veröffentlicht am 13. Mai 1999 von Quokkagirl

5.0 von 5 Sternen The best book I've ever read!
Hi there! I'm from Sweden and I just want to say that this is the best book I've read! Have anybody read this book? And have you made a summary of it? Lesen Sie weiter...
Am 18. April 1999 veröffentlicht

5.0 von 5 Sternen My annual Spring tonic--wit at its best!
I was given a copy of this book about 12 years ago. It has turned out to be one the best gifts I've ever received. Lesen Sie weiter...
Veröffentlicht am 12. April 1999 von greene922@aol.com

4.0 von 5 Sternen Good book, but old
I can't say anything that anyone else has not already said so I'll just add that I probably missed about half the humor because it's just too old.
Am 3. April 1999 veröffentlicht

5.0 von 5 Sternen This book is pure fun, very rarely dull.
I think this book was well worth reading. It's written in a very intelligent way with the base story mixed with the novel-like short stories. Lesen Sie weiter...
Am 10. Januar 1999 veröffentlicht

Nur in den Rezensionen zu diesem Produkt suchen



Kunden diskutieren

Das Forum zu diesem Produkt
Diskussion Antworten Jüngster Beitrag
Noch keine Diskussionen

Fragen stellen. Meinungen austauschen. Neues erfahren.
Neue Diskussion starten
Thema:
Erster Beitrag:
Eingabe des Log-ins
 


Aktive Diskussionen in ähnlichen Foren
   
Ähnliche Foren


Lieblingslisten



Anhand des Sachgebietes nach ähnlichen Produkten suchen:












Das bedeutet, jeder Titel/Artikel muss zu Sachgebiet 1 UND zu Sachgebiet 2 UND... gehören.


Für Sie dokumentiert

 (Was ist das?)

Sobald Sie sich Produktseiten oder Suchergebnisse angesehen haben, finden Sie diese Seiten zu Ihrer Information hier aufgeführt.