oder
Loggen Sie sich ein, um 1-Click® einzuschalten.
 
 
Alle Angebote
9 Angebote ab EUR 12,13

Möchten Sie verkaufen?
Hier verkaufen
 
   
Philosophy in a Time of Terror: Dialogues with Jurgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida
 
 

Philosophy in a Time of Terror: Dialogues with Jurgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida (Gebundene Ausgabe)

von Giovanna Borradori (Autor), Jurgen Habermas (Autor) "B O R R A D O R I : Do you consider what we now tend to call "September 11" an unprecedented event, one..." (mehr)
4.0 von 5 Sternen  Alle Rezensionen anzeigen (1 Kundenrezension)
Statt: EUR 21,99
Jetzt: EUR 20,99 Kostenlose Lieferung. Siehe Details.
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
Derzeit nicht auf Lager.
Bestellen Sie jetzt und wir liefern, sobald der Artikel verfügbar ist. Sie erhalten von uns eine E-Mail mit dem voraussichtlichen Lieferdatum, sobald uns diese Information vorliegt. Ihr Konto wird erst dann belastet, wenn wir den Artikel verschicken.
Verkauf und Versand durch Amazon.de. Geschenkverpackung verfügbar.

4 neu ab EUR 14,95 5 gebraucht ab EUR 12,13
Amazon Kindle
Amazon Kindle - Jetzt internationaler Versand aus den USA
Entdecken Sie über 250.000 englischsprachige Bücher, Zeitungen und Zeitschriften. Mehr erfahren und bestellen bei Amazon.com in den USA.

Wird oft zusammen gekauft

Kunden kaufen diesen Artikel zusammen mit Jacques Derrida zur Einführung von Heinz Kimmerle

Philosophy in a Time of Terror: Dialogues with Jurgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida + Jacques Derrida zur Einführung
Preis für beide: EUR 34,89

Einer der beiden Artikel ist schneller versandfertig. Details anzeigen

  • Dieser Artikel: Philosophy in a Time of Terror: Dialogues with Jurgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida von Giovanna Borradori

    Derzeit nicht auf Lager.
    Bestellen Sie jetzt und wir liefern, sobald der Artikel verfügbar ist. Sie erhalten von uns eine E-Mail mit dem voraussichtlichen Lieferdatum, sobald uns diese Information vorliegt. Ihr Konto wird erst dann belastet, wenn wir den Artikel verschicken.
    Verkauf und Versand durch Amazon.de.
    Kostenlose Lieferung. Details

  • Jacques Derrida zur Einführung von Heinz Kimmerle

    Auf Lager.
    Verkauf und Versand durch Amazon.de.
    Kostenlose Lieferung bei einem Bestellwert ab EUR 20. Details


Produktinformation

  • Gebundene Ausgabe: 200 Seiten
  • Verlag: University of Chicago Press (15. Juni 2003)
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • ISBN-10: 0226066649
  • ISBN-13: 978-0226066646
  • Größe und/oder Gewicht: 21,9 x 18,1 x 1,9 cm
  • Durchschnittliche Kundenbewertung: 4.0 von 5 Sternen  Alle Rezensionen anzeigen (1 Kundenrezension)
  • Amazon.de Verkaufsrang: Nr. 404.705 in Englische Bücher (Die Bestseller Englische Bücher)
  • Komplettes Inhaltsverzeichnis ansehen

Produktbeschreibungen

Kurzbeschreibung

The idea for "Philosophy in a Time of Terror" was born hours after the terrorist attacks on 9/11 and came to realization just weeks later when Giovanna Borradori sat down with Jurgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida, in separate interviews, in New York City. Guided by Borradori, Habermas and Derrida evaluated the significance of the most destructive terrorist attack ever perpetrated. The resulting book is an unprecedented encounter between two of the most influential thinkers of our age: here for the first time Habermas and Derrida overcome their antagonism and agree to appear side by side in this book. In her introduction, Borradori contends that philosophy has an invaluable contribution to make to the understanding of terrorism. Just as the traumas produced by colonialism, totalitarianism and the Holocaust wrote the history of the 20th century, the history of the 21st century is already signed by global terrorism. Each dialogue, accompanied by a critical essay, recognizes the magnitude of this upcoming challenge. Characteristically, Habermas's dialogue is dense, compact and elegantly traditional. Derrida's, on the other hand, takes the reader on a long, winding and unpredictable road. Yet unexpected agreements emerge between them: both have a deep suspicion of the concept of "terrorism" and see the need for a transition from classical international law, premised on the model of nation-states, to a new cosmopolitan order based on continental alliances. As Derrida and Habermas disassemble and reassemble what we think we know about terrorism, they break from the familiar social and political rhetoric increasingly polarized between good and evil. In this process, we watch two of the great philosophical minds at work.


Synopsis

The idea for "Philosophy in a Time of Terror" was born hours after the terrorist attacks on 9/11 and came to realization just weeks later when Giovanna Borradori sat down with Jurgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida, in separate interviews, in New York City. Guided by Borradori, Habermas and Derrida evaluated the significance of the most destructive terrorist attack ever perpetrated. The resulting book is an unprecedented encounter between two of the most influential thinkers of our age: here for the first time Habermas and Derrida overcome their antagonism and agree to appear side by side in this book. In her introduction, Borradori contends that philosophy has an invaluable contribution to make to the understanding of terrorism. Just as the traumas produced by colonialism, totalitarianism and the Holocaust wrote the history of the 20th century, the history of the 21st century is already signed by global terrorism. Each dialogue, accompanied by a critical essay, recognizes the magnitude of this upcoming challenge. Characteristically, Habermas's dialogue is dense, compact and elegantly traditional.

Derrida's, on the other hand, takes the reader on a long, winding and unpredictable road. Yet unexpected agreements emerge between them: both have a deep suspicion of the concept of "terrorism" and see the need for a transition from classical international law, premised on the model of nation-states, to a new cosmopolitan order based on continental alliances. As Derrida and Habermas disassemble and reassemble what we think we know about terrorism, they break from the familiar social and political rhetoric increasingly polarized between good and evil. In this process, we watch two of the great philosophical minds at work.


In diesem Buch (Mehr dazu)
Einleitungssatz
B O R R A D O R I : Do you consider what we now tend to call "September 11" an unprecedented event, one that radically alters the way we see ourselves? Lesen Sie die erste Seite
Mehr entdecken
Wortanzeiger
Ausgewählte Seiten ansehen
Buchdeckel | Copyright | Inhaltsverzeichnis | Auszug | Stichwortverzeichnis | Rückseite
Hier reinlesen und suchen:

Tags

 (Was ist das?)
Bei einem Tag handelt es sich um ein Schlagwort, das zum Produkt passt.
Tags erleichtern allen Kunden die Suche und die Sortierung ihrer Lieblingsprodukte.
 

 

Kundenrezensionen

1 Rezension
5 Sterne:    (0)
4 Sterne:
 (1)
3 Sterne:    (0)
2 Sterne:    (0)
1 Sterne:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Durchschnittliche Kundenbewertung
4.0 von 5 Sternen (1 Kundenrezension)
 
 
 
 
Sagen Sie Ihre Meinung zu diesem Artikel:
Die hilfreichsten Kundenrezensionen

 
1 von 1 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich:
4.0 von 5 Sternen Postmodern situation, postmodern ideas, 24. Mai 2006
Von FrKurt Messick "FrKurt Messick" (Bloomington, IN USA) - Alle meine Rezensionen ansehen
(TOP 500 REVIEWER)   
As Borradori states in his introduction, 'Both [Habermas and Derrida] hold that terrorism is an elusive concept that exposes the global political arena to imminent dangers as well as future challenges.' I think that this sums up what many people feel about the war on terrorism - unlike conflicts such as World War I and World War II, or even the more vaguely defined Cold War or Vietnam war, this is a war where there the front-line can be anywhere and nowhere, where the enemies can be anyone and no one, and where the tactics, strategies, motives and hoped-for achievables are so far removed from what traditional political and military methodology deals with that it requires a paradigm shift in our thinking. 'While the Cold War was characterized by the possibility of balance between two superpowers, it is impossible to build a balance with terrorism because the threat does not come from a state but from incalculable forces and incalculable responsibilities.'

As is typical of Derrida, he sees the relationship between terrorism and communication to be paramount. (I was first exposed to Derrida in theology classes, dealing with the postmodern predicament of looking for meaning in language and behind language in ways that make sense). It is perhaps ironic that the term that springs to mind most when contemplating Derrida is 'deconstruction', which is, in often a dramatically literal sense, what terrorism also hopes to achieve. 'The intellectual grounding of Derrida's deconstruction owes much to the nineteenth- and twentieth-century lineage constituted by Nietzsche, Heidegger and Freud. For Derrida, many of the principles to which the Western tradition has attributed universal validity do not capture what we all share or even hope for.' This becomes all the more problematic when dealing with those outside the Western tradition, such as occurred in Vietnam, Korea, and now in the war on terror.

For Derrida, communication is not simply political. 'Derrida engaged the themes of terror as a psychological and metaphysical state as well as terrorism as a political category.' This draws upon philosophical ideas that can reinterpret the events in various ways, as plays out in various media outlets even to this day. But the events of 9/11 for Derrida are not surprising. 'Was 9/11 truly unpredictable? Not for Derrida. ... The kind of attack that the terrorists launched in 2001 had already been prefigured in detail by the technocinematic culture of our days.'

Habermas also sees communication as a critical element. One issue for Habermas is the speed of modern mass communication - it 'works in the interest of those who select and distribute the information rather than those who receive it. Habermas suggests that the pressure of thinking and evaluating data quickly has a political import, because it facilitates an experience of politics based on the persona of the actors rather than the ideas that each of them defends.' Habermas' theory of communicative action, including its idea of violence as distorted communication, shows the importance of perception, understanding, critical analysis and response.

'Habermas understands modernity to be a change in belief attitude rather than a coherent body of beliefs. A belief attitude indicates the way in which we believe rather than what we believe in. Thus, fundamentalism has less to do with any specific text or religious dogma and more to do with the modality of belief.' This fits in many ways when one commentator I read recently who discussed the overall state of Muslim theology, expressing the understanding that the Muslims have never gone through a period of Reformation as Christendom did, nor have Muslims come to embrace the idea of a society and nation-state separate from religious. Indeed, we can hear echoes of this latter idea in political speech in America, often from groups that can be described as (and often embrace the term) fundamentalist. This will continue to be an issue in the war on terror.

Another issue for Habermas will be the issue of nation-state vs. international organisation power. 'Habermas is convinced that what separates the present moment from a full transition to cosmopolitanism is not only a theoretical matter but a practical one, too, for the decisions of the international community need to be respected. ... Unfortunately, the power differential between national and international authorities threatens to weaken the legitimacy of any military intervention and to retool police action as war.' This has been true not just in the twentieth century, but previously as well. The Congress of Vienna, the League of Nations, and the United Nations have all failed to have power to counter the superpowers of their times; alliances such as NATO and the Warsaw Pact relied heavily on one particular partner.

For both Derrida and Habermas, the war on terror is not as simple as Arab vs. West, Muslim against Christian/post-Christian society, or particular nations against one another. Perhaps had this been written after the recent situation with the Dubai acquisition of American ports being stopped, they would have pointed out that once again, our definitions and communicative premises fail - how does one balance the idea that foreign ownership of ports is unwise with the fact that few are concerned when British, Canadian, Australian or Norwegian firms do the same? There is a lack of definition about it all, even when all the words we use, to bring about clarity. The war on terror might be the quintessential post-modern situation.
Kommentar Kommentar | Kommentar als Link | War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich? Ja Nein (Rezension unzumutbar?)


Sagen Sie Ihre Meinung zu diesem Artikel: Eigene Rezension erstellen
 
 
Nur in den Rezensionen zu diesem Produkt suchen



Kunden diskutieren

Das Forum zu diesem Produkt
Diskussion Antworten Jüngster Beitrag
Noch keine Diskussionen

Fragen stellen. Meinungen austauschen. Neues erfahren.
Neue Diskussion starten
Thema:
Erster Beitrag:
Eingabe des Log-ins
 


Aktive Diskussionen in ähnlichen Foren
   
Ähnliche Foren


Ähnliche Artikel finden


Anhand des Sachgebietes nach ähnlichen Produkten suchen:


Ihr Kommentar


Für Sie dokumentiert

 (Was ist das?)

Sobald Sie sich Produktseiten oder Suchergebnisse angesehen haben, finden Sie diese Seiten zu Ihrer Information hier aufgeführt.