Die hilfreichsten Kundenrezensionen
|
|
2 von 2 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich:
5.0 von 5 Sternen
Facinating History of how human types & languages developed, 7. Mai 2000
So easy to read: no science degree required. And so full of the actual scientific information, that I could also play armchair scientist, develop my own theories a few pages ahead of the authors' telling me theirs, and shout AHA! or groan "AW" as further reading showed if I had understood, or not.The author has been studying for sixty years what we can learn now, from differences in human body types, body chemistry, and DNA, about the past travels of the human race as it came to populate the entire world. I am astonished at how far I could see into the distant past through their work and words. Words are a second theme of the book, how languages in general seem also, like modern people, to have had one ancient source and then diversified as early humans expanded. He shows how frequently languages spread without the populations involved being in any way replaced, and explains how some changes, such as inventing farming, were so beneficial that not only the new tongues but also the new body types spread widely from small original sources. There are apparently four great streams of body types: African; Australian; what is called Caucasian; and what is considered Asian, with the last two at different times providing peoples who still have descendants living all the way from Span to different populations of American Indians. Languages seem to include mainly the results of the four body types plus the results of four separate independent inventions of farming, in Palestine, in north China, in south China, and in central America. Finally the gunpowder and trading revolution in Europe largely replaced American languages, and then the industrial revolution, like farming, vastly expanded our total numbers. It is fascinating to understand how the body type and language migrations left traces here and there around the globe that on the surface imply that there is no order to our genetic or linguistic inheritances, but that can be explained on historical grounds as relics of great and ancient migrations. Finally the authors turn to a third theme, which I suspect is their motivation not only for the book but also for the work that made it possible. The Cavalli-Sforzas explain in detail how very similar all peoples are in both genetic heritage and in measurable ability. We are all brothers and sisters and perhaps may come to treat each other more as all our great religions and philosophies suggest that we should, if we can come to better understand and accept our common heritages.
|
|
|
2.0 von 5 Sternen
Wandering through human nature, 5. Juni 2000
Von Ein Kunde
This collaboration between one of the great population geneticists and his filmmaker son promises much but lets down on delivery. The style and content of the book are uneven. Some topics are told in detail and with compelling narrative, particularly the account of L. L. Cavalli-Sforza's work since the 1960s to establish correlations among genetic, linguistic, and archaeological evidence for the history and relationships of the major human groups. Much weaker, however, is his grasp of cultural anthropology, whether in details or in methods. He attempts to convey an impression of the hunter-gatherer lifestyle (predominant through almost all of human history until the last 10,000 years) through extended references to his field research among African pygmies. Unfortunately, though he is quite sympathetic to the pygmies and their way of life, much of the effect is lost in empty generalities (p. 16: "The forest may look gloomy to us but pygmies feel entirely at home and safe there. It is a place where little that is untoward can happen to them, where danger is limited and life very pleasant."), and his cross-cultural examples come almost exclusively from pygmies or from his personal experience of various Western Europeans. Some points of history, used as examples, are in error (Bede was an English monk who lived from 672 or 673 to 735; not a "sixth-century Irish monk" p. 80). Cavalli-Sforza also seems to have little knowledge of modern cultural anthropology. Chapter 8 "Cultural legacies, genetic legacies" is particularly weak, treating a number of topics in a very superficial way, showing no knowledge of the huge body of literature on, among others, marriage patterns and the incest taboo, national character, or "cultural evolution". Some of the problems with this book undoubtedly rest with the translator, who seems to have chosen occasionally awkward or confusing phrasings in English. The book is best when it recounts Cavalli-Sforza's personal experiences and the quest for a unified picture of the relations among human groups. His anecdotes and observations add a human and historical perspective to the story of population genetics, and the technical matters are explained in a comprehensible and even entertaining way. He makes a strong case that differences among human "races" are only skin deep, reflecting adaptation to different climates over the last sixty thousand years, and tells some of his own part in the battle over the IQ and race debate (recently re-ignited with the publication of _The Bell Curve_). One suspects that he would be a great conversationalist at a dinner party, and the portrait of the author (along with his substantial knowledge of human genetics and historical linguistics) is what keeps one reading.
|
|
|
1.0 von 5 Sternen
Politics disguised as science, 1. Mai 2000
Von Ein Kunde
This book is a rather embarassing political tome under the guise of science. Cavalli-Sforza has undoubtedly been in the cross-hairs of the politically correct given his field of population genetics, and his response is to insist that he is a good servant of the Party. The book consists of ten chapters plus a postscript diatribe against "The Bell Curve", but only chapters 5&6 are worth reading. The initial chapters are exceedingly basic biology (in addition to an irrelevant paen to pigmies), and the remainder consists of the author's pronouncements on politics, religion, and other matters about which he apparently knows nothing, all presented in a pseudo-authoritative tone. Examples include the author's assertion that Broca's speech area of the brain is in the temporal lobe (actually the frontal), his repeated excoriation of the Catholic Church for its courageous defense of the unborn, and his reference to the "Hoover depression". In his Bell Curve diatribe, the author writes,"I cannot avoid feeling scared by the arrogance with which the authors always know what interpretation of data is right or wrong, what is good for the country, and what we should do...I have never found scientists who know the sure answer." With the exception of himself, of course. Cavalli-Sforza's son, a film director, is listed as co-author; apparently the book is aimed toward his fellow brain-dead Hollywood types. Given the author's many errors and unproven assertions, one finds oneself doubting the data presented in the small part of the book which actually deals with his population genetics research.
|
|
|
Die neuesten Kundenrezensionen
|
