Die hilfreichsten Kundenrezensionen
|
|
4 von 4 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich:
3.0 von 5 Sternen
Confusion supreme, 23. Januar 2003
Gentle reader, If you are convinced that you purchased a mystery, your conviction may need correction. There are bodies around, for sure, right in the beginning of the book. And somebody is in jail for doing the foul deed. But did he actually do it? Every 100 pages or so we get another character strongly pointing to yet another perpetrator. Those whose job it is to uphold the law sit by and let events pass them by. Nary a real investigation. And don't ever believe you could deduct the identity of the murderer by following the narrative. The whole thing is a surprise without the "I knew it" effect.And if you believe that, at the very least, you have a novel with worthwhile characters and soaring language, forget about that, too. Besides the usual coupling 101, there is really nothing to get excited about. Except, maybe, sentences like "Everything else in life was just the feathers and hide on the foraging animal of love." Or a situation like "What flashed very briefly from Genevieve toward Arthur was raw enough to be hatred. It seemed out of character, but in that look of loathing she'd found his enduring vulnerability, and Arthur flapped a hand against his side." Lovely pictures like "Arthur's round sedan cruised to the curb", not to be outdone by "...the ripe turn of her behind, which he had always found the most becoming part of her anatomy". The author is even versed in the latest slang:"I don't think I done said that to her. Nnn-uhh..... I think the onliest one I gone on to like that was the other dude. And ain nobody seed him in years". No wonder they keep the guy locked up. Waste neither time nor money on this, unless you need a door stop.
|
|
|
4.0 von 5 Sternen
Of Love, Duty and Compulsion, 2. Mai 2007
Reversible Errors has a grand sweep, much like the great Russian novels of the 19th Century such as Crime and Punishment. The book is filled with passion, conflicts, and hopes . . . while grimness grows as the days until an execution dwindle. I found Reversible Errors to be the most eloquent anti-death penalty book I have read. It's even more moving than the evidence that many people on Death Row were innocent when DNA tests were first applied to the evidence. Our justice system is supposed to set free 20 guilty people rather than convict one innocent one. In death penalty cases, we probably aren't doing so well. Innocent people have been executed in many cases. Once that happens, there's little good we can do about it. As we judge, so shall we be judged.
The criminal justice system isn't as neat and objective as television, movies and novels usually make it out to be. But naturally, most people who write about the system do so as nonparticipants. Mr. Turow writes from the vantage point of being both a top-flight lawyer, but also someone who works on death penalty appeals. It's clear that he writes from first-hand experience as to the poor defense work in many of these cases. I once helped defend a client who was accused of attempted murder. I came away from that experience feeling much like this book made me feel.
In Reversible Errors, Arthur Raven, an earnest corporate attorney, is appointed by the court to handle a death penalty appeal. Like most, he views this assignment as undesirable and likely to end in frustration. His client has been convicted based on his own confession to a gruesome triple murder. Arthur's a man who hasn't found love, and assumes that he never will. His commitment to the law does show his love of fulfilling his sense of duty. The central irony of this story is that he will have to choose between that love of duty and his chance for happiness with convicted felon, the former judge in the case, Gillian Sullivan. What would you choose in that situation?
The brilliantly plotted story shows how "neat" pictures of "who did what to whom" usually aren't so neat in reality. Arthur's hopes begin to rise, however, when a witness comes forward to exonerate his client, Rommy "Squirrel" Gandolph, a penny-ante fence whose intelligence and education make it hard for him to help with his own defense. The prosecutor, Muriel Wynn, has her own complex agenda that keeps her from making it easy for Arthur, though. In part, she's blinded by affection for Larry Starczek whose commitment to her leaves all defendants in jeopardy. They're an unattractive pair to read about, but undoing the harm they have created makes for riveting reading. It's not the usual "all prosecutors and cops" are bad story. Instead, the story shows that judges, prosecutors, cops and defense attorneys are flawed, vulnerable people like us all who can be easily drawn away from the messy reality of the truth . . . like why the defendant ended up with soiled pants.
If you don't like your stories realistic and graphic, you may not enjoy this book. Although the central theme is about our endless search for love and acceptance, Reversible Errors is certainly no classic love story. In fact, the romantic aspects are the least well written parts of the book.
After you finish this book, think about times when you've judged a situation incorrectly . . . and lived to regret what you've said and done. How could you have handled the situations better? How can you reverse the error now?
|
|
|
5.0 von 5 Sternen
Of Love, Duty and Compulsion, 2. Mai 2007
Reversible Errors has a grand sweep, much like the great Russian novels of the 19th Century such as Crime and Punishment. The book is filled with passion, conflicts, and hopes . . . while grimness grows as the days until an execution dwindle. I found Reversible Errors to be the most eloquent anti-death penalty book I have read. It's even more moving than the evidence that many people on Death Row were innocent when DNA tests were first applied to the evidence. Our justice system is supposed to set free 20 guilty people rather than convict one innocent one. In death penalty cases, we probably aren't doing so well. Innocent people have been executed in many cases. Once that happens, there's little good we can do about it. As we judge, so shall we be judged.
The criminal justice system isn't as neat and objective as television, movies and novels usually make it out to be. But naturally, most people who write about the system do so as nonparticipants. Mr. Turow writes from the vantage point of being both a top-flight lawyer, but also someone who works on death penalty appeals. It's clear that he writes from first-hand experience as to the poor defense work in many of these cases. I once helped defend a client who was accused of attempted murder. I came away from that experience feeling much like this book made me feel.
In Reversible Errors, Arthur Raven, an earnest corporate attorney, is appointed by the court to handle a death penalty appeal. Like most, he views this assignment as undesirable and likely to end in frustration. His client has been convicted based on his own confession to a gruesome triple murder. Arthur's a man who hasn't found love, and assumes that he never will. His commitment to the law does show his love of fulfilling his sense of duty. The central irony of this story is that he will have to choose between that love of duty and his chance for happiness with convicted felon, the former judge in the case, Gillian Sullivan. What would you choose in that situation?
The brilliantly plotted story shows how "neat" pictures of "who did what to whom" usually aren't so neat in reality. Arthur's hopes begin to rise, however, when a witness comes forward to exonerate his client, Rommy "Squirrel" Gandolph, a penny-ante fence whose intelligence and education make it hard for him to help with his own defense. The prosecutor, Muriel Wynn, has her own complex agenda that keeps her from making it easy for Arthur, though. In part, she's blinded by affection for Larry Starczek whose commitment to her leaves all defendants in jeopardy. They're an unattractive pair to read about, but undoing the harm they have created makes for riveting reading. It's not the usual "all prosecutors and cops" are bad story. Instead, the story shows that judges, prosecutors, cops and defense attorneys are flawed, vulnerable people like us all who can be easily drawn away from the messy reality of the truth . . . like why the defendant ended up with soiled pants.
If you don't like your stories realistic and graphic, you may not enjoy this book. Although the central theme is about our endless search for love and acceptance, Reversible Errors is certainly no classic love story. In fact, the romantic aspects are the least well written parts of the book.
After you finish this book, think about times when you've judged a situation incorrectly . . . and lived to regret what you've said and done. How could you have handled the situations better? How can you reverse the error now?
|
|
|
|