3 Angebote ab EUR 22,88

Möchten Sie verkaufen? Hier verkaufen
 
 
Defenders of the Truth. The Sociobiology Debate
 
 

Defenders of the Truth. The Sociobiology Debate (Taschenbuch)

von Ullica Segerstråle (Autor) "This book is about different versions of science and different conceptions of the responsibility of a scientist ..." (mehr)
5.0 von 5 Sternen  Alle Rezensionen anzeigen (3 Kundenrezensionen)

Erhältlich bei diesen Anbietern.


2 neu ab EUR 23,16 1 gebraucht ab EUR 22,88

Produktinformation

  • Taschenbuch: 512 Seiten
  • Verlag: Oxford University Press; Auflage: New edition (15. März 2001)
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • ISBN-10: 0192862154
  • ISBN-13: 978-0192862150
  • Größe und/oder Gewicht: 19,5 x 13 x 2,8 cm
  • Durchschnittliche Kundenbewertung: 5.0 von 5 Sternen  Alle Rezensionen anzeigen (3 Kundenrezensionen)
  • Amazon.de Verkaufsrang: Nr. 640.650 in Englische Bücher (Die Bestseller Englische Bücher)
  • Komplettes Inhaltsverzeichnis ansehen

Produktbeschreibungen

Amazon.co.uk

How do scientists separate their politics from their work--or is such a distinction even possible? These questions frame the two levels of sociologist Ullica Segerstrale's analysis of the sociobiology controversy, Defenders of the Truth. From EO Wilson's 1975 publication of Sociobiology to his 1998 release of Consilience, he has consistently been the often unwilling centre of the vitriolic debate over human nature and its scientific study. Heavy hitters such as Richard Dawkins, Stephen Jay Gould and John Maynard Smith have lined up to attack and defend the scientific, political and moral interpretations and implications of Wilson's synthesis, and Dr Segerstrale tells a compelling story of their battles on multiple fronts. The author knows her science, having trained extensively in biochemistry before turning to sociology; while she distances herself from assessing the validity of the various claims, she is clearly sympathetic to Wilson, who seems almost naive at times when his ideas are interpreted ideologically rather than scientifically.

That, of course, is the heart of the contention surrounding sociobiology. The political left, well-represented among evolutionary biologists, has long considered any genetic influence on human behaviour anathema--such theories are believed to support racist policies, even in the unlikely event that they were not merely reflections of racist attitudes. To their credit, many scientists held more complex beliefs, but some used the ideological argument as a back-door to introduce their own neo-Darwinian scientific theories. The struggle for understanding has been eclipsed for some time by the struggle for political and academic survival and dominance, and Segerstrale reports and scrutinises both with humour, intelligence and aplomb. The end of the controversy--if there can be one--is far off, but a careful reading of Defenders of the Truth will give insight into the forces influencing our scientific self-examination. --Rob Lightner -- Dieser Text bezieht sich auf eine vergriffene oder nicht verfügbare Ausgabe dieses Titels.

Amazon.com

How do scientists separate their politics from their work--or is such a distinction even possible? These questions frame the two levels of sociologist Ullica Segerstrale's analysis of the sociobiology controversy, Defenders of the Truth. From E.O. Wilson's 1975 publication of Sociobiology to his 1998 release of Consilience, he has consistently been the often-unwilling center of the vitriolic debate over human nature and its scientific study. Heavy hitters like Richard Dawkins, Stephen Jay Gould, and John Maynard Smith have lined up to attack and defend the scientific, political, and moral interpretations and implications of Wilson's synthesis, and Dr. Segerstrale tells a compelling story of their battles on multiple fronts. The author knows her science, having trained extensively in biochemistry before turning to sociology. While she distances herself from assessing the validity of the various claims, Segerstrale is clearly sympathetic to Wilson, who seems almost naïve at times when his ideas are interpreted ideologically rather than scientifically.

That, of course, is the heart of the contention surrounding sociobiology. The political left, well-represented among evolutionary biologists, has long considered any genetic influence on human behavior anathema--such theories are believed to support racist policies, even in the unlikely event that they were not merely reflections of racist attitudes. To their credit, many scientists held more complex beliefs, but some used the ideological argument as a back door to introduce their own neo-Darwinian scientific theories. The struggle for understanding has been eclipsed for some time by the struggle for political and academic survival and dominance, and Segerstrale reports and scrutinizes both with humor, intelligence, and aplomb. The end of the controversy--if there can be one--is far off, but a careful reading of Defenders of the Truth will give insight into the forces influencing our scientific self-examination. --Rob Lightner -- Dieser Text bezieht sich auf eine vergriffene oder nicht verfügbare Ausgabe dieses Titels.


In diesem Buch (Mehr dazu)
Einleitungssatz
This book is about different versions of science and different conceptions of the responsibility of a scientist. Lesen Sie die erste Seite
Mehr entdecken
Wortanzeiger
Ausgewählte Seiten ansehen
Buchdeckel | Copyright | Inhaltsverzeichnis | Auszug | Stichwortverzeichnis | Rückseite
Hier reinlesen und suchen:

Tags

 (Was ist das?)
Bei einem Tag handelt es sich um ein Schlagwort, das zum Produkt passt.
Tags erleichtern allen Kunden die Suche und die Sortierung ihrer Lieblingsprodukte.
 

 

Kundenrezensionen

3 Rezensionen
5 Sterne:
 (3)
4 Sterne:    (0)
3 Sterne:    (0)
2 Sterne:    (0)
1 Sterne:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Durchschnittliche Kundenbewertung
5.0 von 5 Sternen (3 Kundenrezensionen)
 
 
 
 
Sagen Sie Ihre Meinung zu diesem Artikel:
Die hilfreichsten Kundenrezensionen

 
5.0 von 5 Sternen Utterly brilliant, hugely entertaining., 29. Mai 2000
At the outset of her book, Segerstrale comes up with a marvelous (and hugely entertaining) overview of the sociobiology controversy as an opera. Everyone sings their part, the emotions and language is overwrought, alliances shift, and we (the audience) are eventually left drained from the experience. While her tongue is firmly in cheek, opera isn't a bad comparison. Because so much of the controversy over sociobiology today feels like a performance. One side setting up straw men to knock over in order to increase their own moral capital. The end result is the most human view of science I've ever encountered (human in the sense of "human frailty").

Because in the end, we see that the whole "sociobiology debate" wasn't really a scientific debate at all. The moral and political arguements were what created and drove the controversy all along. And Segerstrale reminds us all too strongly of something that's easily forgotten ... that science is (and will always be) a human pursuit. Driven by the same human emotions that drive all other pursuits. As Segerstrale herself says in the book's final words, two features often thought alien to science -- emotion and belief -- turn out to be omnipresent. They may not drive science, but they do drive scientists. And this book is a truly remarkable look at the controversy, the characters and the way science really works. It deserves to be read as widely as possible.

Helfen Sie anderen Kunden bei der Suche nach den hilfreichsten Rezensionen  
War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich? Ja Nein


 
5.0 von 5 Sternen Honest, definitive and insightful, 7. Mai 2000
Ullica Segerstrale has been extraordinarily resourceful in her research. She managed to interview many of the major players in the controversy that raged in the years's after Edward O. Wilson's book Sociobiology was published. Her reporting is honest and balanced, her interpretations insightful and highly original. For those interested in the subject, a real page-turner.
Helfen Sie anderen Kunden bei der Suche nach den hilfreichsten Rezensionen  
War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich? Ja Nein


 
5.0 von 5 Sternen A Masterful Historical and Interpretive Success, 30. April 2000
Von Herbert Gintis (Northampton, MA USA) - Alle meine Rezensionen ansehen
This is a dense but well-written history of the sociobiology debates between E. O. Wilson, Richard Dawkins, John Maynard Smith and others on one side, and Stephen Jay Gould, Richard Lewontin, and Science for the People on the other. Most of the authors material was gather for her 1983 Ph.D. dissertation, but there is plenty of material from the mid to late 1990's as well.

Despite the length and degree of detail of the book, I found it difficult to skip even a page, so well is it written and so engaging is the author. It is hard to believe that she could still inject new insights in to the analysis 300 pages in to the book, but this she does, and repeatedly so.

The author has deep respect for the anti-sociobiologists, but she is clearly on the side of their critics. In this I believe she is correct. While my personal history is closer to that of the opponents (I was a Marxist and an anti-racist activist at the same time Gould, Lewontin, et al. were) I never had the slightest sympathy for their critique of E. O. Wilson (I read Sociobiology when it first came out and didn't even mind the infamous last chapter, though I though it was wrong---and it is), and their treatment of Maynard Smith, Dawkins, and more recently evolutionary psychology, is to mind simply silly and ignorant---the opponents may be great biologists, but they are third rate amateurs at understanding social theory and human sociality, in my opinion.

I'm sure there are lessons to be learned from this intellectual saga, but I must report that the greatest pleasure for me was to see great minds battle it out in public. Of course, behind the scenes scientists were slowly and patiently working out the real issues, and we are measurable better informed now that when this battle began in the mid-1970's. The sociobiologists and behavioral ecologists won the scientific war, though the enemy is still sniping away around the perimeter.

Helfen Sie anderen Kunden bei der Suche nach den hilfreichsten Rezensionen  
War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich? Ja Nein

Sagen Sie Ihre Meinung zu diesem Artikel: Eigene Rezension erstellen
 
 
 
Nur in den Rezensionen zu diesem Produkt suchen



Kunden diskutieren

Das Forum zu diesem Produkt
Diskussion Antworten Jüngster Beitrag
Noch keine Diskussionen

Fragen stellen. Meinungen austauschen. Neues erfahren.
Neue Diskussion starten
Thema:
Erster Beitrag:
Eingabe des Log-ins
 


Aktive Diskussionen in ähnlichen Foren
   
Ähnliche Foren


Lieblingslisten


Ähnliche Artikel finden


Anhand des Sachgebietes nach ähnlichen Produkten suchen:


Ihr Kommentar


Für Sie dokumentiert

 (Was ist das?)

Sobald Sie sich Produktseiten oder Suchergebnisse angesehen haben, finden Sie diese Seiten zu Ihrer Information hier aufgeführt.