I've been reading the book reviews, many of which are glowing beyond measure...and I can respect the author's past and why she felt so strongly about writing this novel. In and of itself, the Wide Sargasso Sea story, while incredibly depressing, and not altogether perfect, is interesting on several levels (historically, women's issues, Creole women's issues, etc.). Indeed, the latest film version is well acted especially by the heroine, and you do like her, feel sorry for her and wonder why she's thought mad, since she doesn't seem at all insane.
But I have to ask: Have any of these people actually READ the Jane Eyre novel? Because if they had, they'd see that this author, who's chosen to write her book based on the classic, doesn't even keep to the specific details in the book, about Rochester, about Bertha Mason, about her family--mother, brother, etc. Antoinette is certainly not the crude, loose, bad-tempered, whorish, insane, mean and nasty character she's described in Jane Eyre. In Sargasso Sea, Rochester is portrayed as a thoroughly nasty, mean, selfish brute, while in the original, Jane Eyre, despite all his faults, he's actually likeable and lovable and has a heart. I realize there are some diehards out there who love Sargasso Sea, but it is such a different tale, and doesn't bother even to conform to the details described in Jane Eyre, that it seems morally wrong to attach itself to the Jane Eyre novel, which is one of hope, love, redemption, and yes, even humor at times. I felt insulted that this novel could claim to be the prequel to Jane Eyre. It's a story, alright, but I don't think it's the one that would have preceded Jane Eyre. Don't believe me? Re-read (or even read) Jane Eyre.