When Money Dies: The Nightmare of Deficit Spending, Devaluation, and Hyperinflation in Weimar Germany [Englisch] [Taschenbuch]

"Zeros in -- Zeros out. Naught is Naught." or "Making the Same Old Mistakes, but not Makin' Mo' Money", 30 May 2006
By Jamal "Jim" Hattab "hnaforjones" (TX, USA)

I first read this book some 25 years ago. I was so impressed I immediately bought a dozen copies & gave them to pals. (In 1980 they were 3-4 pounds sterling each--it's ironic & interesting that the price of this out-of-print book now fetches multiple zeros).
Here are some parallels with our time:
The Germany of the '20s finds it cannot meet the costs of war reparations. The US of the 2000s starts a war intending to pay reparations before it begins, and then finds itself unable to meet the mounting the costs of war reparations it originally thought would leap out of the ground and just pay themselves. (Meanwhile, the US's wounded soldiers [& the families of its dead soldiers] are going to require entire lifetimes of domestic reparations).
The Germany of the '20s attempted to buy/finance prosperity with ballooning deficits. The US of the 2000s wants to buy/ finance prosperity with ballooning deficits. Neither nation-State can be told it is wrong--and neither admits (or even recognizes) inflation is a hidden and pernicious tax.
Germany before the '20s had every confidence in the mark. The US in the 2000s believes the only currency in the world is the dollar, & the only thing money can be made of is paper and ink (never gold or silver). But as one mixes ink with paper, hoping the mixture will have exchange value, one finds that one has given value to neither material.
As Germany becomes more unhinged in the '20s, it moves towards a strong man as a moth to a flame. As the US grows more unhinged, it loses faith in its 'strong man' (even if he does not lose faith in himself). If the US should subsequently shun whoever wants to be the next 'strong man', there may yet be be hope. Since it is possible for the next wannabe 'strong man' to be laughed off the stage, it is yet possible the US will not succumb. The jury is still out.
At times the mark strenghthens (goes against the ultimate trend, for short periods): the Germans of the '20s (and other investors) think the crisis is over and it is time to buy. At times the dollar strengthens (goes against the ultmate trend [?], for short periods): the world of the 2000s thinks the crisis may end--isn't it now time to buy cheap US assets?
The Germans of the '20s can add more zeros to their paper--but paper producition does not keep up with the 'demand' for money. The US of the 2000s has but to generate a computer entry and like magic, the 'demand' for money is met. The paper of Germany leaves a trail [Fergusson proves this]--computer entries can be a hidden and dirty little State Secret [until prices rise as the money actually depreciates, the state can suppress much of the evidence].
At many levels, this book about a frightening past speaks to a menacing present. Because of its price, many will not get to read that message. Between the Germany of the '20s and the US of the 2000s, there are differences too, but not differences that necessarily help. The potential for money supply to soar (the Fed's ability to create credit by computer without even having to buy ink, paper, and printers) has never been so boundless. We of the 2000s prefer to believe we are more intellegent than the Germans of the 20s. We live with the hope that our enlightened leaders comprehend inflation & understand that deficit spending shall ruin us. Enlighted people that they are, from government top to government bottom, we know and rely upon our leaders' fiscal responsibility. Just look at how enlightenment runs through the Nation--budgetary constraints are placed upon our brilliant leader, by those guardians of the Public Purse & Trust, a US legislature that checks and balances all his raw power. If you buy into the spin, they all do their utmost to preserve & protect the currency, while shouldering their duties to preserve and protect our Constitution. Tonight, can I sleep contentedly, knowing both these National Treasures are safe and sound?
Read this book: it is still found in libraries. You will be witness to ink on paper that actually has and holds its value.

In dem Buch werden im Detail die Ereignisse jedes Monats besprochen. Dabei bleibt es leider oft auch. Nur wenige Protagonisten werden als Zeitzeugen herangezogen. Es sind aber fast ausnahmslos Außenstehende (z.B. britisches Konsulat) oder Bürger der Mittel- bis Oberschicht. Eine Analyse und Bewertung der Vorgänge kommt zu kurz.
Es ist schwierig dem beschriebenen Wertverlust im Verlauf der Handlung zu folgen. Die Beispiele haben zur heutigen Zeit wenig Bezug. Eine Zeitleiste oder zusammenfassendes Kapitel zu diesem Bereich fehlt.
Das Werk stellt für mich eine Chronik der Ereignisse dar, "Tagebuch einer Hyperinflation" wäre ein passender Titel. Wer sicht bereits mit der Materie vertraut gemacht hat kann mit dieser Lektüre tief in Details eintauchen. Allen Anderen kann man dieses Buch nicht empfehlen. Dazu fehlt ein roter Faden und ein Konzept jenseits der Auflistung der Ereignisse.

The time of Hyperinflation in Germany interests me a lot. Alas, this is not the book to read about it. It starts on the wrong foot:
On page 12 of the Prologue it says:" This is emphatically not an economic study". At the end of the Prologue the writer says that it is a moral tale. In my opinion it isn't. It is a historical account of the period. And that makes it boring. Month by month am I told what exactly happened.

The book is insufficient:
1. It presents no timeline. That would have been really helpful in reading this book.
2. It doesn't give answer to the question why the Germans didn't flee their country in search of better pastures. I am told that some Germans worked in France in this period. But why didn't they mass-emigrate to the USA like the Irish did in their times of need?
3. Of what this period meant to the Germans is in this story mostly told by Lord D'Abernon, the British ambassador to Berlin for more than six years, and by Erna van Pustau, whose father was a small Hamburg businessman who ran a fishmarket. In this historical account they tell the story from the outside. That is obvious in the case of Lord D'Abernon because he was an Englishman and therefore not affected by what happened. Erna van Pustau is clearly from a well-off family. Examples are given by these two but, as I said, they are from the outside. It certainly doesn't give you a feeling or even enough information how the normal German coped in this period.

This book is a historical account and a boring one. In itself it doesn't give the reader enough information.