The cover of the American edition of this book demonstrates, to some degree, the difference between working definitions of glamor in the United States and in England. In the United States... Well, you see from the cover. The English cover shows the Dowager Duchess at her age (90), comfortably -- even proudly -- holding two prize hens. It could be that the covers show something of the difference in expectations readers will have as they wade into this autobiography.
Almost a third of the book deals with the Duchess' life before she married. She describes in detail the Victorian backgrounds of both her parents and what it was like to grow up in an unsentimental household where the birth of another daughter (she is the youngest of six daughters and a lone, prized son) was scarcely greeted with undiluted joy. Armchair psychologists will find much to mine because the descriptions of her family are affectionate, but unvarnished to the point of unsparing. But the Duchess' family was not unique in this respect among members of their socio-economic class. Their circumstances, comparatively reduced for the circles in which they traveled, required a degree of creative economizing, whether in the family's having to move house or in organizing yet another "coming out" for a daughter.
The sketches of her sisters carry overtones of love, but are also stinging and regretful. The Duchess is, keep in mind, one of the legendary Mitford sisters. Among them was a famous novelist and raconteur, another was the whistle blower on the notoriously exploitative American funeral industry (The American Way of Death, still in print), another was an infamous Hitler sympathizer who in fact took occupancy of an apartment in Germany from which a Jewish family had been evicted. If a hint of condescension enters in, perhaps it cannot be helped. The writer was, it could be argued, the most successful of the sisters: in the event, the most long-lived and prosperous. She was also, at least according to her telling, the one to whom others turned when illness and other vicissitudes struck.
Americans for the most part have an idea of dukes and duchesses that is well conveyed (and appealed to) in the portrait chosen for the American book cover. The reality is quite different. The Duchess married a younger son, Andrew Cavendish, who stood to inherit nothing of the status and responsibility of that would be conferred on his elder brother. But World War II changed things with the death of the elder son, William. As a result, her husband inherited a title in a family whose aristocratic roots extend back to the 16th century. He also inherited crushing debt because inheritance tax in post-War Britain was, in effect, confiscatory. Transferring some important works of art to the State and opening Chatsworth to the public were ways of dealing with the debt.
Chatsworth required extensive rehabilitation and renovation, and some of the book deals with an arduous task that might have daunted anyone who truly understood what the job would require. The Duchess became a knowledgeable and effective decorator whose skills have been called upon for projects beyond Chatsworth. The Duchess' country upbringing contributed, too, to her willingness to tackle gardens, livestock, and shooting. These days the latter is an unpopular topic in many quarters, but the Duchess is intransigently unapologetic. Game management is part of country life; perforce hunting is, as well.
Those of us who remember where we were the day Kennedy was shot might be interested in what the Duchess relates in the appendices about her friendship with JFK. She attended both his inauguration and his funeral.
Lest this sound like a life of cosseted privilege, it must be added that the Duke and Duchess experienced the extraordinary sadness of burying more than one baby. Her husband became alcoholic and did not recover on his first attempt. There is much more about which the Duchess writes. Her tone in the telling is far from detached, but completely lacks self-pity.
To this point, I have been describing the story told in this autobiography. My point is that I think it is an interesting life; my intention is not to pass any kind of judgment on it. A review, though, is more than a description. My review of the book is brief. I think it is intelligently written and that the writer turns phrases boldly, but not brashly. She weaves together the many strands of a story almost seamlessly.
At almost 400 pages, it is not a short autobiography so it impressed me that my interest was unflagging. The writing shows wit, acumen, irony, command of many topics (e.g., her "review" of Graceland), and occasionally just a hint of score settling. There is not a great deal of introspection. Whether this suggests a lack of insight might say more about the reader than about the writer.
The photographs represent the sweep of the Duchess' life and fortunes. They illustrate the story and, in a sense, augment it.
I like the genre of contemporary autobiography. This book will remain on my shelf as an exemplar of the genre. And I think I shall return to its stories again and again. For me, that makes it worthy of fully five stars.