I've read all of Hemingway's work over a several year period and I do find that -- he would be happy to know -- he is one of the few authors that I (at least) can read again, and sometimes yet again. One of his goals was to write such that you weren't sure how the author accomplished the novel's form or story -- it just unfolds magically somehow for you -- and thus the writing is re-readable, perhaps many times. While Hemingway's "The Garden of Eden" may achieve this goal more than any other, "To Have and Have Not" does this for me, too. Besides that ineffable quality, I like the adventure in the book, the locale and the descriptions, the complex characters and how the stories all somehow intertwine (even when they don't perfectly). When I'm finished reading it, I also feel that I could read it again in a few years. And I have a few times. What is great is that I find something new each time. Overall, this somewhat unusual, typically underappreciated Hemingway novel is one of my favorites for reasons that I can't readily explain -- which is probably how it's meant to be! It simply has recurring allure.