| ||||||||||||||||||
![]() Gutschein erhalten
Tauschen Sie jetzt The Third Chimpanzee: The Evolution and Future of the Human Animal (P.S.) gegen einen Amazon-Gutschein in Höhe von EUR 0,50 ein - einlösbar für Tausende von Artikeln bei Amazon.de. Entdecken Sie mehr eintauschbare Bücher im Bücher Trade-In Shop. Bitte beachten Sie die Teilnahmebedingungen.
Jetzt für Amazon Student anmelden und um 20% erhöhten Eintauschwert sichern. |
Produktinformation
Möchten Sie die Produktinformationen aktualisieren oder Feedback zu den Produktabbildungen geben?
Ist der Verkauf dieses Produkts für Sie nicht akzeptabel? |
It's obvious that humans are unlike all animals. It's also obvious that we're a species of big mammal down to the minutest details of our anatomy and our molecules. That contradiction is the most fascinating feature of the human species.
The chapters in The Third Chimpanzee on the oddities of human reproductive biology were later expanded in Why Is Sex Fun? Here, they're linked to Diamond's views of human psychology and history.
Diamond is officially a physiologist at UCLA medical school, but he's also one of the best birdwatchers in the world. The current scientific consensus that "primitive" humans created ecological catastrophes in the Pacific islands, Australia, and the New World owes a great deal to his fieldwork and insight. In Diamond's view, the current global ecological crisis isn't due to modern technology per se, but to basic weaknesses in human nature. But, he says, "I'm cautiously optimistic. If we will learn from our past that I have traced, our own future may yet prove brighter than that of the other two chimpanzees." --Mary Ellen Curtin -- Dieser Text bezieht sich auf eine vergriffene oder nicht verfügbare Ausgabe dieses Titels.
Tags, die Kunden mit diesem Produkt verbinden(Was ist das?)Klicken Sie zum Suchen verwandter Artikel, Diskussionen oder Personen auf ein Tag.
|
However, his main argument, that complexity makes us unique as a species, takes up too many pages, and, in some instances, he tells us what to think instead of allowing us to come to our own conclusions.
One of my teachers made an interesting point: when people outside of the profession tackle anthropology, their thinking tends to be linear. (One example is the works of Ed O. Wilson, who is a biologist.) This book tends to be that way in its arguments; Diamond (who is a professor of physiology) is very selective in his examples by including only certain human cultures or animals to make his points.
Some of the points Diamond makes are just simply absurd. He writes, "If the seeds of self-destruction have been so closely linked with the rise of advanced civilizations in other solar systems as well, it becomes easy to understand why we have not been visited by any flying saucers." He's trying to tie human genocide to possible alien cultures!
Lastly, some of his thoughts on environmental issues tend to (I think) promote his own political ideas. But you can decide that for yourself.
If you're looking for an interesting contrast, pick up one of Gould's books (like Full House.) This contrast can indeed be glaring at times, but Diamond does a good job, in the respect of making the subject matter interesting and readable to the general public.
|
Das Forum zu diesem Produkt
Fragen stellen, Meinungen austauschen, Einblicke gewinnen Aktive Diskussionen in ähnlichen Foren
Kundendiskussionen durchsuchen
|
Ähnliche Foren
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|