I bought this book because Yossi Beilin is a long time peace warrior. He has been in the middle of some of the most important negotiations between the Israelis and Palestinians, and is the architect of the first comprehensive peace agreement between these two peoples. His story is as compelling as his accomplishments, and the reason I bought this book is to here this man's story. I wanted to hear his story about his experiences in the negotiating rooms, and more importantly I wanted to hear his side of the Geneva Accords. I wanted to know what it was like trying to hold peace talks during the second Intifada and the premiership of Sharon. I wanted to know what it was like fighting for peace at a time when peace had never seemed so distant, and what it was like pursuing this peace in the wake of an Israeli government more suited for war than peace and very much opposed to his actions.
I wanted the insiders account that only Mr. Beilin could offer, instead what he delivers is nothing more than an analysis of negotiations held by other people. He discusses the Oslo Accords, Camp David and the Taba talks in great detail but not so much as a participant but as an outside observer. The main problem is that hundreds of books have been written analyzing these negotiations by historians, political scientists, participants, ect that this book begs the question of why should anyone read this one. The author doesn't go into any detail of his own experiences but leaves these outside, instead deciding to focus on what other people did. I have read numerous books written by those that did participate in the actual discussions, and I have also read books that analysts that discuss these talks from the outside, and so I found myself unable to figure out a reason to read yet another book that did not give me the unique perspective of the author, instead what I got was his perspective on what the other participants did. I can get this from a hundred other sources.
The author's take on Barak and the Palestinians is not new or particularly inciteful. His take on Camp David provides no insights, and as for Taba any reader would be much better off reading Shlomo Ben-Ami or Gilead Sher. There are just better books that cover these same areas.
The biggest failing is the lack of discussion about the Geneva Accords. I still don't understand why there was no focus on one of his biggest achievements. The book would have redeemed itself with just forty or fifty pages devoted to this topic but it wasn't to be. In the end I can't and don't recommend this book. There are better books out there that cover the same issues in a much more astute way. His is an opinion peace that doesn't have enough weight.