In weniger als einer Minute können Sie mit dem Lesen von The Meltdown Years auf Ihrem Kindle beginnen. Sie haben noch keinen Kindle? Hier kaufen Oder fangen Sie mit einer unserer gratis Kindle Lese-Apps sofort an zu lesen.

An Ihren Kindle oder ein anderes Gerät senden

 
 
 

Kostenlos testen

Jetzt kostenlos reinlesen

An Ihren Kindle oder ein anderes Gerät senden

Jeder kann Kindle Bücher lesen  selbst ohne ein Kindle-Gerät  mit der KOSTENFREIEN Kindle App für Smartphones, Tablets und Computer.
Der Artikel ist in folgender Variante leider nicht verfügbar
Keine Abbildung vorhanden für
Farbe:
Keine Abbildung vorhanden

 

The Meltdown Years: The Unfolding of the Global Economic Crisis [Kindle Edition]

Wolfgang Munchau

Kindle-Preis: EUR 16,67 Inkl. MwSt. und kostenloser drahtloser Lieferung über Amazon Whispernet

Weitere Ausgaben

Amazon-Preis Neu ab Gebraucht ab
Kindle Edition EUR 16,67  
Gebundene Ausgabe EUR 20,95  

Produktbeschreibungen

Kurzbeschreibung

The Meltdown Years offers the most lucid and useful explanation to date about why home values, life savings, job security, and investments around the world are in peril.

Rather than focus on who is to blame, though, author Wolfgang Münchau takes the more practical approach of focusing on what is to blame. The fact that individuals were stupid, greedy, and corrupt should come as no surprise. What’s remarkable is that our world’s financial systems—put in place to help stave off such a crisis—failed so miserably.

What is inherently wrong with the global monetary system? What happened to the regulatory process? What role did the credit market, hedge funds, and investment banks play? These are the types of questions one must answer in order to truly comprehend what caused the meltdown and, more importantly, to understand what must be done to repair it.

Münchau dissects the global financial system, exposing its flaws and weaknesses in the context of the crisis. A decidedly global perspective of the greatest financial crisis of our time, The Meltdown Years examines

  • The structure of the world banking system
  • Global events that led to financial collapse
  • The growth of speculative bubbles
  • The descent from financial crisis into full-out recession

Pointing to an unstable global economic system as the root of the problem, the author predicts how long the recession willand illustrates long-term consequences of the meltdown.

“Apportioning [individual] blame for this crisis may be fun,” Münchau writes, “but it is a dead-end road for anyone who seeks an understanding of what happened.” AIG, Alan Greenspan, Fannie Mae, Bear Stearns… Each is portrayed as a villain responsible for the state of the economy. In truth, the blame is much broader and lies much deeper.

The Meltdown Years is required reading for anyone who wants to follow the ongoing debate about economic recovery and understand what the collapse means for the future of financial capitalism.

Buchrückseite

Total Systems Failure: The Global Financial Breakdown and How to Repair It

2008 will go down in history as the year the U.S. financial system plunged over the cliff—and pulled the global economy along with it. Nevertheless, says Financial Times editor Wolfgang Münchau, this is not an American problem requiring an American solution. The meltdown was caused by inherent defects in the global economy. It is the world’s problem, and it will take international action to fix it.

An updated edition of Verboben, Münchau’s award-winning book published in Germany in 2008, The Meltdown Years provides a solid foundation in the structure and workings of the global economy and presents a broad view of the financial crisis.

Münchau focuses on three main questions:

  • What were the key events that led to the global financial bubble?
  • How did the meltdown start and why did it spread?
  • What needs to be done to repair the economy and to avoid future setbacks?

Münchau puts the pieces of the puzzle together to form a remarkably clear picture of an extraordinarily complex subject--while providing actionable advice for creating a more durable financial order.


Produktinformation


Mehr über den Autor

Entdecken Sie Bücher, lesen Sie über Autoren und mehr

Kundenrezensionen

Es gibt noch keine Kundenrezensionen auf Amazon.de
5 Sterne
4 Sterne
3 Sterne
2 Sterne
1 Sterne
Die hilfreichsten Kundenrezensionen auf Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com: 4.6 von 5 Sternen  8 Rezensionen
5 von 5 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
5.0 von 5 Sternen PONZI MUST DIE 21. Februar 2010
Von DAVID BRYSON - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format:Gebundene Ausgabe
The only financial reality is cash.

I was first taught this elementary wisdom nearly half a century ago, and here it is reinforced although not precisely so phrased. The author gets nearest to saying it when he quotes the source from whom I would most expect economic wisdom, the mighty Galbraith, who states that the financial market is entirely unsuited to innovation. The so-called innovations are almost entirely sleight of hand, and Munchau makes that abundantly and beautifully clear. The whole history of derivatives-gone-doolally is sketched in until we reach his publication date of mid-2009, by which time our own self-inflicted crisis is well and truly on us. And by long before then Munchau is ready to call the whole looking-glass world of Credit Default Swaps, Collateralised Debt Obligations and the rest of such gobbledegook a scam and a Ponzi scheme.

Let me make it clear that this book is a piece of analysis and not a sermon or a political tract. What superb analysis it is too. The bare bones of the matter, all the way from the basic structure of a balance sheet to the essentials of the most outre modern `instruments' are laid out with exemplary clarity. No political or ideological thrust is needed for it to be clear, just from a patient exegesis, that the banks and the money markets were operating a giant Ponzi scheme. As with Madoff, it was all dependent on fair weather conditions. As long as the economic bubble kept expanding people kept being paid out and those few who questioned the whole mad scenario in public were ignored or loftily dismissed, although there must have been many more who were silenced behind the scenes, as is the way of it all. When the bubble burst, or deflated with greater speed or less, it was Madoff all over again - nobody knows you are bathing naked until the tide goes out. When it went out, it was obvious (as it could have been long before if folk had been willing to see the point) that the emperor had no clothes, which is to say that many banks and insurers had no cash.

It is not particularly harmful to Munchau's very clearly presented case, but he gets tied up in his own terminology by looking for the `cause' of the present crisis. Talking about `cause' is a convenient way to talk, even in academic and scientific discussions. However when we try to press the expression to the point of identifying it with precision we find we can't do it, and Munchau can no more do it than any of us can. David Hume proved that for all time in the 18th century. Doing without this unhelpful word, Munchau's lucid reasoning separates the greater from the lesser elements in the vipers' nest of intertwined problems we have landed ourselves in. I'd say to any reader - take M's presentation of the facts and build your own reasoning on it. For instance, how crucial are trade imbalances between countries? I thought he was leaning one way for a while, but then he seemed to succumb to the traditional caricature of economists by leaning the opposite way. Usually he is less equivocal, and although he laudably views bankers claiming lavish bonuses as being of a social status roughly equivalent to that of child molesters, he has the fair-mindedness not to try to identify this phenomenon as a `cause' of the present crisis. At least he may have (if not a British resident) escaped the frequent ordeal of beholding Angela Knight of the woeful countenance lugubriously lecturing the large tranche of the British public struggling with losing their incomes or pensions or having their homes repossessed on how multi-billion bonuses to bank executives, paid out of taxpayers' money, should not be opposed by morally minded citizens.

Munchau bravely offers his own solutions or at least routes to a solution, and I don't feel like trying to assess these beyond saying Beware of the `experts' who will. In the first place the experts are no more free from prejudices and pet theories than anyone else, and in the second place the increasingly-used mathematical models are suspect and demonstrably so. This is not to disparage mathematical modelling, it is only to say that it is inviting disaster to pretend that we can quantify risk when a bit of common sense tells us that we can't, at least not when a Gordian knot of complexity has to be processed. Models of this kind can only be as good as the assumptions fed into them and a few minutes' look at some of the latter should warn us to be careful. There is an additional risk in trusting to processes that we don't understand, and it is an elementary fault of methodology to leave that additional factor out of the risk-assessment overall.

Munchau's own proposals rely rather heavily on international co-operation, and I don't wish to decry this view. I'm all for it but it's not unobvious that even within such a self-righteously trans-national co-operative model as the EU such values have to struggle, at least at our present level of maturity. Try selling the concept in practice to Frau Merkel. Myself, I'm attracted by a cruder plan, consisting of identifying and pillorying Ponzi schemes and any countries which use them. That is my own interpretation of what I have learned from this excellent book. As for the often-heard bleat that we should not deny bankers their bonuses, otherwise the best ones will go elsewhere, Munchau sees it off with magnificent scorn. Best at what? We've seen what they're good at and we don't need it.
2 von 2 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
5.0 von 5 Sternen How we came so close to a modern economic depression 19. Oktober 2009
Von John Chancellor - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format:Gebundene Ausgabe
Did you ever wonder why it was necessary for the government to bail out AIG? And what all those investment bankers did to deserve those huge bonuses? This is a book that will answer most if not all your questions about what happened and why.

The Meltdown Years, written by Wolfgang Munchau, a Financial Times journalist, is a very in-depth look at how close we came to a total financial meltdown. The book is not about placing blame for all that went wrong but for trying to understand the reasons for the crisis and more importantly what steps need to be taken to prevent future such events.

The book is divided into three major parts. Part one discusses the policies and events prior to the meltdown. This section contains many side-bars that explain how banks operate, the functions of the central banks and many of the more exotic credit instruments that were contributing factors in the financial meltdown.

Part two goes into great detail about the actual meltdown. While we all lived through it, for many of us the magnitude and implications of what was happening did not register. The author does a good job of detailing the events and how close we came to a total global collapse.

The theme of part three is why did it happen and what now. The author looks at the most popular suspected causes and discusses them in detail. They are: greedy bankers, hedge funds and tax havens, faulty risk models, financial deregulation and lax supervision, monetary policy and global imbalances.

He then discusses each suspected cause in great detail. The case of greedy bankers and their excessive bonus system "...was an important factor in this crisis. There is a strong case to tax these bonuses out of existence. But alas, the bonus system did not cause the financial crisis."

Wolfgang then goes on to explore the other suspected causes and develop reasons he thinks are the root cause of the crisis.

Although the book deals with concepts and terms that are totally foreign to most of us - such as CDS (credit default swaps) or CDO (collateralized debt obligations) - Wolfgang explains these terms and gives understandable examples. The book is arranged so that those familiar with these terms and concepts can easily skip the side-bar explanations.

The book was written in the spring of 2009 and although the author does not have the advantage of historical perspective, it is still a very important work. We need to understand that we live in a global society and what happens in China affects us. A large part of the crisis was because in America we were consuming on a level that was not sustainable.

You will come away with a much better understanding of what caused the crisis, you will be frightened about how close we came to total financial meltdown and you should have a better view of how to protect yourself in the future. We need to learn to see the signs and take action to protect ourselves.

We must learn from this crisis and begin to hold our leaders accountable. We cannot afford to have such a concentration of risk - such as in AIG or the other large financial institutions and hedge funds. We cannot afford to let financial institutions get too big to fail.

The book is easy to read and understand - but it is sobering. We need to be better educated and concerned about our financial institutions. This book is a great start.

I was provided a complimentary copy of this book by the publisher.
5.0 von 5 Sternen A EUROPEAN ECONOMIST LOOKS "GLOBALLY" AT THE 2008-2009 FISCAL CRISIS 15. November 2012
Von Steven H. Propp - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format:Gebundene Ausgabe
Wolfgang Münchau is considered one of the world's foremost experts on the Eurozone. He writes the European economic column of the Financial Times. He wrote in the Prologue to this 2010 book, "[The book] takes the reader on a journey starting in the early 1970s and ends in 2009, in the hope of presenting a broader picture of our crisis... [it] aims to furnish the reader with sufficient background knowledge to understand what happened, and to follow the present debate about the economic recovery, how to rescue the banking sector, and what consequences to draw for the future of financial capitalism." (Pg. 2-3)

He notes, "The buyers of these loans are the Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs) mentioned earlier... The important thing is that the SPV does not appear on the bank's balance sheet. An SPV is therefore a nonbank, but part of the shadow banking sector. An SPV performs the function of a bank, and yet it is not regulated as a bank." (Pg. 67)

He observes, "Most economists, central bankers, and finance professionals looked the other way. And as for the general public, they had no idea that the credit market even existed. They certainly had no idea that it would soon blow up and so greatly affect their lives." (Pg. 94) He adds, "After the collapse of the credit markets in 2007, the blame game began... The rating system was completely discredited... the question arises as to whether a system that consists of the ratings and valuations of a small group of private companies is optimal." (Pg. 113-114)

He states, "When the big banks and insurance companies got bailed out by their governments... the top executives nevertheless insisted on their bonus payments... Bankers were so incompetent that they had to be bailed out by the government, and then they rewarded themselves for their failure. It is no surprise that this outrageous behavior has greatly contributed to what I call regulatory outrage." (Pg. 170)

He concludes, "the really good news is that the best talent of the next generation will no longer be devoted to moving wealth from one corner of the globe to another. There are more important things to do in the twenty-first century. Nobler tasks will emerge." (Pg. 222-223)

This "european" perspective on the fiscal crisis is very interesting, and will be of great value to anyone studying the crisis of 2008-2009.
4.0 von 5 Sternen The Meltdown Years 27. August 2010
Von Ed - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format:Gebundene Ausgabe
Well written. Easy to read and understand explanation of the worldwide events responsible for the current economic downturn. Limited ideas for solutions.
5.0 von 5 Sternen Essential for an Understanding of the Crisis 18. Mai 2010
Von James M. Stone Jr. - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format:Gebundene Ausgabe
Economists and economic historians will be debating the causes of our near-miss at a global depression far into the future. Muenchhau's book will be an excellent source for future work. Today, it is perhaps one of a half-dozen books on the crisis (which of course may not be over) essential to our current understanding of events leading to the Fall of 2008.

There are two aspects of the crisis which are not addressed: U.S. political influences and the global growth in the inequality of wealth distribution. Perhaps, the reason is simply that both are outside of what he believed his own competence to be and the former must be left to political scientists, while the latter falls into the purview of economists.

Here are a few thoughts on the first.

In 2001, we were in the initial stages of the dot-com recession, yet no one could predict its severity. Co-existant with this were generally accepted projections, based on the Clinton years and a Republican Congress, of government budgetary surpluses, totaling as much as $5.6 trillion over the next ten years. Indeed, this projection was a driving factor in the Bush tax cuts (coupled with the belief of White House economists in Reaganomics). The some $1.7 trillion in tax cuts were based on two assumptions: that the dot-com recession could be corrected and would not be severe and that no unanticipated requirements for increases in government expeditures would be forthcoming. As a "hedge," in this regard, the initial moderate Republican and Democratic suggestions were that the tax cuts could include "triggers" whereby they could be reversed without additional Congressional action if needed. The "temporary nature" of the cuts was a political compromise, between the White House, which favored permenant cuts, and Congress, to obtain the support for passage.

The events of 9/11 changed the projections...effectively throwing them out completely. It both threatened to kill the [...] recovery and promised to mandate additional government spending in going to war and in homeland security.

At that point, the Bush Administration was faced with a choice: Call for the repeal of the tax cuts or count on the principles of Reaganomics for the promotion of additional GDP growth, which would maintain the debt to GDP ratio, even as debt increased. Given the experience of Bush Senior's decision to raise taxes, to pay for the expense of Gulf War I and his subsequent loss of a second term, Bush Junior selected the latter approach. However, this of course created enormous political pressure for domestic economic growth. On June 17, 2002, in Atlanta, Bush announced a major Administration program for the increase in "affordable housing" for low-income, minority homeownership by 5.5 million homes over the next ten years. This program had the advantage of bi-partisian appeal (the Democratic support of the CRA), in addition to creating jobs in the construction and financial services industry and stimulating domestic economic growth.

The subprime loan boom followed (2003-2006). In the 2004 Presidential campaign, the largest single Bush contributor was Roland Arnall, CEO and founder of Ameriquest, one of the nation's largest subprime lenders. Additionally, in 2004, Wall Street, which normally gives a slight edge in political contributions to Democrats, contributed to Bush over Kerry by 2:1.

The real estate bubble had the desired effect and it is possible, it could have been "wound down" successfully had not the wars gone on longer and cost substantially more than originally forecast (a White House economic advisor was fired for suggesting that Iraq might cost as much as $200 billion - it cost five time that). As a result, noone wanted to point out the obvious - the unsoundness of the underlying mortgages - and lending standards continued to decline. In 2006, the first sign of collapse occurred with Ameriquest laying off 4,000 employees and closing their nation-wide retail outlets. We had "scrapped the bottom of the barrel" and the process began reversing itself. During 2006, the Administration attempted to reverse course by changing the deck chairs on the Titanic - beginning with Greenspan's retirement, replacing the SEC, FDIC, FHEA heads and bringing in Paulson as Secretary of the Treasury. But, it was too late.
Waren diese Rezensionen hilfreich?   Wir wollen von Ihnen hören.

Kunden diskutieren

Das Forum zu diesem Produkt
Diskussion Antworten Jüngster Beitrag
Noch keine Diskussionen

Fragen stellen, Meinungen austauschen, Einblicke gewinnen
Neue Diskussion starten
Thema:
Erster Beitrag:
Eingabe des Log-ins
 

Kundendiskussionen durchsuchen
Alle Amazon-Diskussionen durchsuchen
   


Ähnliche Artikel finden