|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Wird oft zusammen gekauft
Produktinformation
|
Welche anderen Artikel kaufen Kunden, nachdem sie diesen Artikel angesehen haben?
In diesem Buch
(Mehr dazu)
Einleitungssatz
Welcome to the wonderful world of the Winawer. Lesen Sie die erste Seite
Buchdeckel | Copyright | Inhaltsverzeichnis | Auszug | Stichwortverzeichnis | Rückseite
Welcome to the wonderful world of the Winawer. Lesen Sie die erste Seite
Mehr entdecken
Wortanzeiger
Ausgewählte Seiten ansehenWortanzeiger
Buchdeckel | Copyright | Inhaltsverzeichnis | Auszug | Stichwortverzeichnis | Rückseite
Tags, die Kunden mit diesem Produkt verbinden(Was ist das?)Klicken Sie zum Suchen verwandter Artikel, Diskussionen oder Personen auf ein Tag.
|
Eine digitale Version dieses Buchs im Kindle-Shop verkaufen
Wenn Sie ein Verleger oder Autor sind und die digitalen Rechte an einem Buch haben, können Sie die digitale Version des Buchs in unserem Kindle-Shop verkaufen.
Weitere Informationen
Kundenrezensionen
Es gibt noch keine Kundenrezensionen auf Amazon.de
5 Sterne
4 Sterne
3 Sterne
2 Sterne
1 Sterne
Die hilfreichsten Kundenrezensionen auf Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com:
6 Rezensionen
22 von 26 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
misdirection
17. Juni 2005
Here are several reasons you should avoid this book:
1) the author gives 2 games in the introduction and neither are from the French.
2) the author begins with the Winawer variation which is probably the most complex and where the 'basic ideas' will take a back seat to heavy tactical complications. (Also, I don't know why he didn't think it necessary to explain typical plans or tactical motifs before you jumped into the most theory-laden line of the French. He didn't even discuss pain chains at any length!!).
3) the annotations he quotes offer little explaination as to the philosophy of the variation. Also, most was written before in other sources in ChessBase (in fact he quotes verbatim a good deal of analysis without giving credit).
4) he actually MISquotes some games (i.e. he claims Morozevich played ...Qd8 when, if you actually look up the game, Morozevich played ...Qc7. This can be very confusing in some positions where the given move is simply bad. He also claims equality in some lines which are considered clearly better for white by other annotators (including the players themselves or the silicon kind).
5) there are much better books on the French available. (see John Watson's terrific (but complex) "Play the French" or "Mastering the French" or a Psakhis book or a Danny King Video or just about anything else).
6)Most importantly, you don't actually learn how to 'Start Out' playing the French. The analysis is heavy, inaccurate, and doesn't teach you must at all. Trying to learn the basics of the French by repeating GM analysis on Morozevich or Korchnoi games isn't not very instructive at all for class players.
1) the author gives 2 games in the introduction and neither are from the French.
2) the author begins with the Winawer variation which is probably the most complex and where the 'basic ideas' will take a back seat to heavy tactical complications. (Also, I don't know why he didn't think it necessary to explain typical plans or tactical motifs before you jumped into the most theory-laden line of the French. He didn't even discuss pain chains at any length!!).
3) the annotations he quotes offer little explaination as to the philosophy of the variation. Also, most was written before in other sources in ChessBase (in fact he quotes verbatim a good deal of analysis without giving credit).
4) he actually MISquotes some games (i.e. he claims Morozevich played ...Qd8 when, if you actually look up the game, Morozevich played ...Qc7. This can be very confusing in some positions where the given move is simply bad. He also claims equality in some lines which are considered clearly better for white by other annotators (including the players themselves or the silicon kind).
5) there are much better books on the French available. (see John Watson's terrific (but complex) "Play the French" or "Mastering the French" or a Psakhis book or a Danny King Video or just about anything else).
6)Most importantly, you don't actually learn how to 'Start Out' playing the French. The analysis is heavy, inaccurate, and doesn't teach you must at all. Trying to learn the basics of the French by repeating GM analysis on Morozevich or Korchnoi games isn't not very instructive at all for class players.
16 von 19 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
The Best Beginner Book on the French
20. März 2003
The reason this book is good may not so much be content, but the fact that there are no other books on the French Defence designed for beginners. I know somewhere there is a Learn French with the Read and Play Method...
There are a lot of good reasons to play the french. First, it's an opening that gets a lot of play in top level tournaments, so you always have something new going on in your opening. Second, it is a counterattacking opening, just like the sicilian. The real difference is that in the french you don't have to learn as many structures to play, unless you want to.
I can't really comment on the section about the Winawer, as I have no desire to play it. However, the section on the classical, Tarrasch, and Advance have helped me understand the "why" behind the varations I've memorized. Just reading through this, I have realized points when in games I had a winning position because of an opponents tactical or positional blunder, only to lose it.
The games in the book are mostly master level games from the last couple of years, giving the book an up to date feeling. Plus, all lines of the french are covered. The entire book won't be helpful to everyone though, unless you're looking to find lines that suit you. All in all, get this book, play through the games, and you'll have a great base to expand on for the future.
8 von 9 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
Good book, but only for french defence starters
8. Februar 2006
Im aware that very recently, and especially throughout this year (2006) there would be published really a bunch of the new french books. Added to existing Psakhis 4 volume series, would be Pedersens new works which would also close its series, and there would be Sam Collins French Advance, which to me at least tell that Everyman too would like to close its series in near future. All in all, there is all of a sudden a lot of material for advanced player.
But, there are almost none for beginner. So this book is trying to accomplish that goal. Well, it succeded, but partially. As the previous rewiers noted, the lines are not perfect in every variation, but honestly, I think that is no of much significance for starters. What is more important is feeling for playing french u can catch with this book because author really explained the particularies and plans nicely.
Recommended for beginers in french, best followed by Play the french from Watson.
But, there are almost none for beginner. So this book is trying to accomplish that goal. Well, it succeded, but partially. As the previous rewiers noted, the lines are not perfect in every variation, but honestly, I think that is no of much significance for starters. What is more important is feeling for playing french u can catch with this book because author really explained the particularies and plans nicely.
Recommended for beginers in french, best followed by Play the french from Watson.
Waren diese Rezensionen hilfreich?
Wir wollen von Ihnen hören.
Kunden diskutieren
|
Das Forum zu diesem Produkt
Fragen stellen, Meinungen austauschen, Einblicke gewinnen Aktive Diskussionen in ähnlichen Foren
Kundendiskussionen durchsuchen
|
Ähnliche Foren
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lieblingslisten
Ähnliche Artikel finden
Anhand des Sachgebietes nach ähnlichen Produkten suchen:
Ihr Kommentar
Möchten Sie die Produktinformationen aktualisieren oder Feedback zu den Produktabbildungen geben?
|
