I can respect this book for carrying on the Blade Runner story, but in reality the whole thing's just a waste because it's pretty obvious that Deckard was a replicant. Once you know this and watch the movie, especially the Director's Cut, it becomes pretty obvious. I mean, first of all the guy gets beaten around unmerciful by just about every other replicant in the movie, yet it doesn't really seem to faze him (except for the broken fingers). He pulls himself up a building using only one hand, too. Then of course there's his Unicorn dream, and at the end of the film we see that Gaff has left a Unicorn origami for Deckard, clueing him in to the fact that Deckard himself is a replicant. Gaff knows what Deckard dreams about because he knows everything that's been implanted in Deckard's head. Of course, if this isn't enough to convince you then there's also the fact that Ridley Scott, the director of the movie, has stated that it was always his belief that Deckard was a replicant, he just never implicitly stated that in the film. My take on the end of the movie was that Deckard was slowly realizing he was a replicant (hence his fascination with playing and re-playing the interview Holden did with Leon) and then once he saw that Gaff had left the Unicorn he decided to hell with it, and went on the run with Sean Young's character, Rachel. I was hoping Jeter's book would follow this, maybe pick up right after the movie, answer some questions that the movie didn't, but instead he's just done a re-hash of the film's plot and merely given us a dry hump instead of the real thing.