The Catcher in the Rye and Philosophy und über 1,5 Millionen weitere Bücher verfügbar für Amazon Kindle. Erfahren Sie mehr

Loggen Sie sich ein, um 1-Click® einzuschalten.
Mit kostenloser Probeteilnahme bei Amazon Prime. Melden Sie sich während des Bestellvorgangs an.
Jetzt eintauschen
und EUR 1,41 Gutschein erhalten
Alle Angebote
Möchten Sie verkaufen? Hier verkaufen
Der Artikel ist in folgender Variante leider nicht verfügbar
Keine Abbildung vorhanden für
Keine Abbildung vorhanden

Beginnen Sie mit dem Lesen von The Catcher in the Rye and Philosophy auf Ihrem Kindle in weniger als einer Minute.

Sie haben keinen Kindle? Hier kaufen oder eine gratis Kindle Lese-App herunterladen.

The Catcher in the Rye and Philosophy: A Book for Bastards, Morons, and Madmen (Popular Culture & Philosophy) [Englisch] [Taschenbuch]

Keith Dromm , Heather Salter

Statt: EUR 12,76
Jetzt: EUR 12,75 kostenlose Lieferung. Siehe Details.
  Alle Preisangaben inkl. MwSt.
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
Nur noch 2 auf Lager (mehr ist unterwegs).
Verkauf und Versand durch Amazon. Geschenkverpackung verfügbar.
Lieferung bis Mittwoch, 1. Oktober: Wählen Sie an der Kasse Morning-Express. Siehe Details.

Weitere Ausgaben

Amazon-Preis Neu ab Gebraucht ab
Kindle Edition EUR 10,81  
Taschenbuch EUR 12,75  


25. Oktober 2012 Popular Culture & Philosophy (Buch 71)
Few novels have had more influence on individuals and literary culture than J.D. Salinger's The Catcher in the Rye. Published in 1951 and intended by Salinger for adults (early drafts were published in the New Yorker and Colliers), the novel quickly became championed by youth who identified with the awkwardness and alienation of the novel's protagonist, Holden Caulfield. Since then the book and its reclusive author have been fixtures of both popular and literary culture. Catcher is perhaps the only modern novel that is revered equally by the countless Americans whom Holden Caulfield helped through high school and puberty and literary critics (such as the New Yorker's Adam Gopnik who insisted as recently as 2010 that Catcher is a "perfect" twentieth-century novel). One premise of The Catcher in the Rye and Philosophy is that the ease and sincerity with which readers identify with Holden Caulfield rests on Salinger's attention to the nuances and qualities of experience in the modern world. Coupled with Salinger's deft subjective, first-person style, Holden comes to seem more real than any fictional character should. This and other paradoxes raised by the novel are treated by authors who find answers in philosophy, particularly in twentieth-century phenomenology and existentialism--areas of philosophy that share Salinger's attention to lived, as opposed to theorized, experience. Holden's preoccupation with "phonies," along with his constant striving to interpret and judge the motives and beliefs of those around him, also taps into contemporary interest in philosophical theories of justice and Harry Frankfurt's recently celebrated analysis of "bullshit." Per Salinger's request, Catcher has never been made into a movie. One measure of the devotion and fanatical interest Catcher continues to inspire, however, is speculation in blogs and magazines about whether movie rights may become available in the wake of Salinger's death in 2010. These articles remain purely hypothetical, but the questions they inspire--Who would direct? And, especially, Who would star as Holden Caulfield?--are as vivid and real as Holden himself.

Wird oft zusammen gekauft

The Catcher in the Rye and Philosophy: A Book for Bastards, Morons, and Madmen (Popular Culture & Philosophy) + The Catcher in the Rye
Preis für beide: EUR 18,05

Die ausgewählten Artikel zusammen kaufen
  • The Catcher in the Rye EUR 5,30

Kunden, die diesen Artikel gekauft haben, kauften auch


Mehr über den Autor

Entdecken Sie Bücher, lesen Sie über Autoren und mehr


Über den Autor und weitere Mitwirkende

Keith Dromm is Associate Professor of Philosophy at Louisiana Scholars' College, Northwestern State University and author Wittgenstein on Rules and Nature (2008). Heather Salter is Instructor in the Department of Language and Communication at Northwestern State University in Louisiana

Welche anderen Artikel kaufen Kunden, nachdem sie diesen Artikel angesehen haben?

In diesem Buch (Mehr dazu)
Ausgewählte Seiten ansehen
Buchdeckel | Copyright | Inhaltsverzeichnis | Auszug | Stichwortverzeichnis | Rückseite
Hier reinlesen und suchen:


Es gibt noch keine Kundenrezensionen auf
5 Sterne
4 Sterne
3 Sterne
2 Sterne
1 Sterne
Die hilfreichsten Kundenrezensionen auf (beta) 2.5 von 5 Sternen  2 Rezensionen
5 von 7 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
4.0 von 5 Sternen For every high school student who ever stopped to wonder just what "Catcher in the Rye" was really all about: catch this book. 6. Dezember 2012
Von John V. Karavitis - Veröffentlicht auf
Format:Taschenbuch|Verifizierter Kauf
Reading "Catcher in the Rye" has practically been a rite of passage for almost everyone who has attended an American high school in the last half century. It is the story of a day in the life of a "teenager from an upper-class background, who attends boarding schools in the northeastern United States" (p. xi) who, while in the midst of the throes of adolescence, might very well be going insane. This latest entry in Open Court's "Popular Culture and Philosophy" series tackles this American icon head-on, and, although far from perfect, it provides numerous philosophical insights into a number of aspects of Holden Caulfield's tortured existence. Overall, it is worth a read for anyone who really wants to get deeper into what "Catcher..." was really all about.

Clocking in at 215 pages, this entry leans toward the more recent shorter and quicker essay format that seems to be the current trend for these pop culture and philosophy books. One danger in relying on a shorter essay format is that the essays can become little more than glorified encyclopedia entries. Another danger is that, having less room to artfully weave together the chosen philosophical theme with the subject matter, these shorter, quicker essays will whet the appetite, but not satisfy it. In spite of this, enough of the sixteen essays were satisfying, with missteps occurring with those essays that either lacked a philosophical basis for their social commentary (chps. 5, 8, 13), were weak and rambling (chps. 6, 10), or had nothing whatsoever to do with philosophy (chp. 15 - psychiatry, and chp. 16 - literary criticism). Seven of the seventeen contributors were not philosophy PhDs or students. Co-editor Keith Dromm's solo essay (chp. 6) was weak and rambling, and the very last essay, co-authored by both Mr. Dromm and co-editor Heather Slater, although well-written and enjoyable, was focused on literary criticism, and not on philosophy. Dare I say it? The "curse of the book's editor" strikes again. Tsk tsk tsk...

The book's sixteen essays are grouped into four sections of four essays each. Section 1, "Lawyers and Other Phonies", covers morality, lying, self-knowledge, and Kierkegaard's view of irony. Section 2, "Holden's Rules for Crumby Stuff", covers the role of love, sexual ethics, moral responsibility, and personal moral principles. Section 3, "Where Do the Ducks Go?", covers time, the philosophy of disgust, phenomenology, and religious faith. Section 4, "Salinger's Trash and All", covers censorship, the role of literature, mental illness, and literary criticism.

The book begins with a self-test for the reader: "Are You a Phony"? "Yes" or "No" responses to each of twenty questions are tallied in order to determine how "phony" the reader is. (In the interest of full disclosure, I scored a 6 out of 20, making me "somewhat phony", although, I assure you, this review is absolutely not.) Co-editors Dromm and Slater then provide a solid introduction that sets the tone for this collection of essays by noting that the these essays are "principally concerned with the novel and the philosophical questions it provokes" (p. xv).

A few of the essays were standouts. Don Fallis' "The Most Terrific Liar You Ever Saw in Your Life" explores what it means to be a "phony" in Holden Caulfield's world. Mr. Fallis' area of expertise is lying and deception, and here he gives us the truth about phonies: being a phony involves insincerity and is consistent with "massive self-deception". Rick Mayock's "You Can't Teach Somebody How to Really Dance" applied Kierkegaard's view of irony to Holden Caulfield's adolescent angst. For Kierkegaard, irony relates to the transition phase between the aesthetic and ethical spheres of life, and for someone in the throes of adolescence, this exactly describes the situation one finds oneself in. The aesthetic stage is pre-ethical, amoral but not immoral, and Holden Caulfield's actions demonstrate that he is in the transition from this phase to an ethical one as he dreams of being a" catcher in the rye". Perhaps THE perfect topic, woven skillfully with the perfect philosophical theme.

Guy Pinku's "The Moral Call and the Moral Catch" invoked Emanuel Levinas' moral call to take responsibility for persons we encounter. Again, the "catcher in the rye" theme is addressed. Marcus Schulzke's "The Elderly Teenager" tries to understand Holden Caulfield's relationship to time by comparing pre-Socratic philosophers Heraclitus (all is change) and Parmenides (change is an illusion), and showing how Plato's theory of forms was an attempt at reconciling these two opposing philosophical viewpoints.

There were good essays that failed because they lacked any real philosophical basis. Jamie Carlin Watson's "Holden Onto What's Right" compared Holden's self-professed "rules" against what everyone else holds as the right way to behave. I enjoyed this essay. It defined the terms "phony", "bastard", "moron", and "madmen" in terms of social norms and moral norms, and held up the "catcher" as the moral ideal. However, it was social commentary, and, perhaps with the exception of mentioning "ought implies can", did not ground itself in philosophy. The very last essay, co-editors Keith Dromm and Heather Slater's "Calling Salinger Up", was a good essay that looked at three schools of literary criticism. What is the point of a novel? Perhaps nothing more than having an aesthetic experience. A point with which I agree. Too bad this essay wasn't on point with its mandate of pop culture and something something...

The worst essay was Michael Cundall's "Is Holden mentally Ill?" It was an essay about psychiatry and mental illness, not philosophy. To add insult to injury, this essay had more typographical errors in it than I think I have ever seen in an essay in this genre. ("Plus ca change", eh, Open Court?)

And there you have it. I may be a bastard in writing these book reviews, but at least I'm not a phony or a moron. Well... maybe just a little mad. Catch THAT, gentle reader! John V. Karavitis
3 von 9 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
1.0 von 5 Sternen Please 25. September 2013
Von Desperate - Veröffentlicht auf
Format:Kindle Edition
As an fervent ebook customer and novice to Catcher in the Rye, I desperately beg that you provde just ONE ebook edition of the actual book, rather then over a dozen study guides. Thank you
Waren diese Rezensionen hilfreich?   Wir wollen von Ihnen hören.

Kunden diskutieren

Das Forum zu diesem Produkt
Diskussion Antworten Jüngster Beitrag
Noch keine Diskussionen

Fragen stellen, Meinungen austauschen, Einblicke gewinnen
Neue Diskussion starten
Erster Beitrag:
Eingabe des Log-ins

Kundendiskussionen durchsuchen
Alle Amazon-Diskussionen durchsuchen

Ähnliche Artikel finden

Ihr Kommentar