The reader Stewart Stakes is completely one-sided in his review of the book. I was born and lived in Argentina up to the Falklands war; the military waged the war on the rationale that they were the champions of anti-communism and could get away with everything they did. The lack of continuity in American, foreign policies between the Carter and the Reagan administrations greatly encouraged the Argentine, genocial Junta to wage the war. The above reader displays the typical ethnocentric, isolationist American mentality, which does not allow to properly regard other people's points of view. I live in the States, I am not anti-American, but I can at least partially agree with the author of the book in what the Falklands War is concerned ( the Korean war is an entirely different matter ). Before and after President Carter, the U.S. showed no practical concern for the genocide that was going on in Argentina. I saw the Falklands War as a battle between democracy ( England ) and Nazi-facism ( Argentina ), but the U.S. was only concerned in defeating communism, even using the fascist, Latin American military as an instrument for the same goal. Why did not President Reagan continued the human rights campaign against Argentina that President Carter had started? Because of Mr. Reagan's sympathies for the anti-communist stand of the Argentine military. Yes, the U.S. ought to acknowledge its share of guilt in the Falklands War, so that anti-americanism in Argentina would not be a fact that encourages fascism there.