|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Wird oft zusammen gekauft
Produktinformation
|
Mehr über den Autor
Entdecken Sie Bücher, lesen Sie über Autoren und mehr
› Besuchen Sie die Seite von Ronald Dworkin auf Amazon
› Besuchen Sie die Seite von Ronald Dworkin auf Amazon
Welche anderen Artikel kaufen Kunden, nachdem sie diesen Artikel angesehen haben?
Tags(Was ist das?)Bei einem Tag handelt es sich um ein Schlagwort, das zum Produkt passt.
Tags erleichtern allen Kunden die Suche und die Sortierung ihrer Lieblingsprodukte. |
Eine digitale Version dieses Buchs im Kindle-Shop verkaufen
Wenn Sie ein Verleger oder Autor sind und die digitalen Rechte an einem Buch haben, können Sie die digitale Version des Buchs in unserem Kindle-Shop verkaufen.
Weitere Informationen
Kundenrezensionen
Die hilfreichsten Kundenrezensionen
1 von 3 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
Format:Taschenbuch
It is a brave author that attempts a new perspective on a topic that has been fodder for politicians and philosophers for thousands of years. Dworkin clears out the old cobwebs and provides insights and new perspectives for the 21st century. It is a must read for anyone serious about our dwindling rights in today's modern society. Well written, not an academic sleeping pill.
Die hilfreichsten Kundenrezensionen auf Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com:
8 Rezensionen
15 von 17 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
Absolute Classic
29. Juli 2006
Format:Taschenbuch
Things are quite simple. If there is A contemporary debate in jurisprudence, it is the so-called Hart/Dworkin debate. It all starts with this wonderful book that cuts deeply and challenges the theory of legal positivism on many levels. As for the theory of rights, Dworkin is a proponent of one of the most coherent, interesting and complex articulations of liberalism. In short: to the extent that fundamental rights are in play, the "political majority" (if such a thing exists) does not have the moral right to tell members of the minority what to do with their own lives. Is not this a simple but powerful moral truth?
4 von 4 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
provokes thoughts but not answers
1. April 2011
Format:Taschenbuch
There are harder works to read in jurisprudence. Ronald Dworkin's book is a modern classic, and it is thought provoking and a great introduction to many of the topics in the field. It's good.
My concern is that he uses a good bit of the book to bash H.L.A. Hart's theory of law. Fine. That COULD have been a useful way to present ideas, but instead Mr. Dworkin provides a very thin strawman of Hart's real argument. And, then, predictably bashes it for its weakness!
So it goes. Dworkin can be a powerful writer, and the book is worth knowing and worth reading.
My concern is that he uses a good bit of the book to bash H.L.A. Hart's theory of law. Fine. That COULD have been a useful way to present ideas, but instead Mr. Dworkin provides a very thin strawman of Hart's real argument. And, then, predictably bashes it for its weakness!
So it goes. Dworkin can be a powerful writer, and the book is worth knowing and worth reading.
3 von 3 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
A thoughtful argument of judicial review
19. Februar 2011
Format:Taschenbuch
Unlike a lot of the scholarship out their debating standards for judicial review, Dworkin's work is both moderate, clearly argued, and intellectually compelling. He argues that many constitutional rights and clauses have strong moral components to them, and as such it is these moral principles judges should interpret. This is in contrast to originalism, which tries to enforce the policy preferences of the founders, not just the concepts they left us with. However, Dworkin also states it might contradict some liberal excesses, particularly judges who substitute their own policy preferences in for faithfulness to the constitution. Throughout, Dworkin is clear in his assumptions, direct in his writing, and tries to engage the reader in a serious conversation (rather than speaking over the readers' heads). I'm not sure I personally would go as far as Dworkin, or even agree with him, but it's nice to finally see a strong argument in defense of a liberal theory of constitutional interpretation.
Waren diese Rezensionen hilfreich?
Wir wollen von Ihnen hören.
Kunden diskutieren
|
Das Forum zu diesem Produkt
Fragen stellen, Meinungen austauschen, Einblicke gewinnen Aktive Diskussionen in ähnlichen Foren
Kundendiskussionen durchsuchen
|
Ähnliche Foren
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lieblingslisten
|
|
Ähnliche Artikel finden
Anhand des Sachgebietes nach ähnlichen Produkten suchen:
Ihr Kommentar
Möchten Sie die Produktinformationen aktualisieren oder Feedback zu den Produktabbildungen geben?
|
