| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Produktinformation
|
The impact of Stranger in a Strange Land was considerable, leading many children of the 60's to set up households based on Michael's water-brother nests. Heinlein loved to pontificate through the mouths of his characters, so modern readers must be willing to overlook the occasional sour note ("Nine times out of ten, if a girl gets raped, it's partly her fault."). That aside, Stranger in a Strange Land is one of the master's best entertainments, provocative as he always loved to be. Can you grok it? --Brooks Peck
Tags, die Kunden mit diesem Produkt verbinden(Was ist das?)Klicken Sie zum Suchen verwandter Artikel, Diskussionen oder Personen auf ein Tag.
|
If you read an older version of this book, then you have missed a little something. Many of the words were cut out of the book before it was published. Moreover, due to contractual agreements the missing part of the book could not be printed while Robert A. Heinlein was alive. Now dead the missing pages have been restored to many versions.
Now all bets are off. So count the words in the copy you are about to buy and be sure you have the whole thing. And for those people who read the original release I suggest you re-read to see what you missed
If you have not read other Heinlein books then you may not realize how his writing stile has changed over his life time. This book is more of a latter Heinlein style. Some people like both early and late Hein lend others prefer one or the other.
The audio versions have all the pluses and minuses of audio. So you will also want a copy of the book for reference.
What i found was another long winded yarn disguised this time as a sociology comment ( which I presume was shocking and sensational when it first came out but comes across now as pretty ordinary ). All through the book, i couldn't shake off the feeling of reading a book written in the 60's.... of watching a 60's B flick. The whole book feels so dated now that i was shaking my head in disbelief. Classics are supposed to be timeless, okay, granted that his commentaries on the nature of mankind is timeless, but the canvas that he paints it on certainly is not. In the end i had to soldier on to finish it as i had on a few occassions been close to quitting, failing to find any solid plot line to grope on.
Frankly, I don't think Heinlein should be mentioned in the same breath as Asimov or Clarke as all his works seem unable to project themselves any further than the 1960s. Any commentary on the possible futures of humanity shouldn't be stuck with images of 60's sci-fi flicks that we see on tv.
|
Das Forum zu diesem Produkt
Fragen stellen, Meinungen austauschen, Einblicke gewinnen Aktive Diskussionen in ähnlichen Foren
Kundendiskussionen durchsuchen
|
Ähnliche Foren
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|