The Standard for Program Management, Second Edition
und über 1,5 Millionen weitere Bücher verfügbar für Amazon Kindle. Erfahren Sie mehr
| ||||||||||||||||||
Wird oft zusammen gekauft
Produktinformation
|
Welche anderen Artikel kaufen Kunden, nachdem sie diesen Artikel angesehen haben?
Kundenrezensionen
Die hilfreichsten Kundenrezensionen
Von Michael Thomas
Format:Taschenbuch
Excellent up to date content of program management best practice. I use this as a reference when taking on new programs and when conducting program reviews.
Die hilfreichsten Kundenrezensionen auf Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com:
3.7 von 5 Sternen
13 Rezensionen
17 von 17 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
4.0 von 5 Sternen
Excellent standard - unless you're just prepping for the exam
4. August 2008
Von Douglas Brown
- Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format:Taschenbuch|Von Amazon bestätigter Kauf
As a program managers' guide this is an excellent book. Given a few hours of thought you can follow it along to a decent program office roll-out.
As a study guide for the PGMP exam, which is supposed to be based on the standard, you're going to be pretty confused. The PGMP exam is nothing like the PMP exam, with its rigid focus on what processes are sub-sets of other processes. For the exam, the main take-aways from this standard are its constant references to: the business-benefit link, to the need for governance, and of course PMI's constant (and usually, tragically, ignored) pleas for the use of a WBS. Those are the only parts you will recognize again on the exam.
Of course you need to read the standard before taking the exam. Ironically, however, this standard is actually considerably more useful as an operational program management reference - which, of course, is what the standard is really meant for. So kudos to the folks who put it together.
As a study guide for the PGMP exam, which is supposed to be based on the standard, you're going to be pretty confused. The PGMP exam is nothing like the PMP exam, with its rigid focus on what processes are sub-sets of other processes. For the exam, the main take-aways from this standard are its constant references to: the business-benefit link, to the need for governance, and of course PMI's constant (and usually, tragically, ignored) pleas for the use of a WBS. Those are the only parts you will recognize again on the exam.
Of course you need to read the standard before taking the exam. Ironically, however, this standard is actually considerably more useful as an operational program management reference - which, of course, is what the standard is really meant for. So kudos to the folks who put it together.
16 von 16 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
3.0 von 5 Sternen
Very High Level
26. Juni 2007
Von Craig Humphreys
- Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format:Taschenbuch
Complex and very high level. Doesn't give practical examples to program managemment. The concepts are easily understood but the implementation detail is very limited. I'll be looking for a book that complements this standard with practical examples and advise in applying the concepts of the standard.
8 von 9 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
3.0 von 5 Sternen
All right for first version...
23. September 2007
Von Naomi Wong
- Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format:Taschenbuch
I do not expect examples in a Standard. But it's too short and incomplete. For example, there are no tools and techniques for the processes. Also there are some silly errors which could have been corrected by a careful copy editing. I hope PMI does a better job in the second version of this standard.
›
Gehen Sie zu Amazon.com, um alle 13 Rezensionen zu sehen
3.7 von 5 Sternen
Waren diese Rezensionen hilfreich?
Wir wollen von Ihnen hören.
Kunden diskutieren
|
Das Forum zu diesem Produkt
Fragen stellen, Meinungen austauschen, Einblicke gewinnen Aktive Diskussionen in ähnlichen Foren
Kundendiskussionen durchsuchen
|
Ähnliche Foren
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lieblingslisten
|
|
Ähnliche Artikel finden
Ihr Kommentar
Möchten Sie die Produktinformationen aktualisieren oder Feedback zu den Produktabbildungen geben?
|
