| ||||||||||||||||||
Produktinformation
Möchten Sie die Produktinformationen aktualisieren oder Feedback zu den Produktabbildungen geben?
Ist der Verkauf dieses Produkts für Sie nicht akzeptabel? |
Tags(Was ist das?)Bei einem Tag handelt es sich um ein Schlagwort, das zum Produkt passt.
Tags erleichtern allen Kunden die Suche und die Sortierung ihrer Lieblingsprodukte. |
|
Sagen Sie Ihre Meinung zu diesem Artikel:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Die hilfreichsten Kundenrezensionen
5 von 5 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich:
4.0 von 5 Sternen
A few reservations.....,
Von Gary Arbuckle (garbuckl@direct.ca) (Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada) - Alle meine Rezensionen ansehen
Rezension bezieht sich auf: A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy (Princeton Paperbacks) (Taschenbuch)
I use this book in teaching, and am very grateful for it. However, there are a few "gotchas" that the reader/student should be aware of.First, it's old. It was done in 1963 and won't be revised, since the author is dead. It thus has a very "traditionalistic" selection of texts, with philosophy more narrowly defined than I feel comfortable with. And of course, it doesn't include any of the textual discoveries since 1963, or any of the groundbreaking textual work, such as Graham's on the Chuang-tzu. There are major authenticity problems with some of the selections from the Kung-sun Lung-tzu and Tung Chung-shu as well. Second, even for its time, it's conservative. The author was, to put it kindly, credulous about some early datings. The discussion of the Lao-tzu is particularly problematic. There is also an overly dismissive attitude towards the thought of some periods, such as the Han. Third, it's somewhat biased, though in a very traditional way. The Neo-Confucian standpoint is more or less assumed true throughout. This detracts from the discussion of some documents earlier than the Neo-Confucians. None of this is an argument not to use the book. But be just a bit careful if you do. Helfen Sie anderen Kunden bei der Suche nach den hilfreichsten Rezensionen
5.0 von 5 Sternen
Good Anthology,
Von
Rezension bezieht sich auf: A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy (Princeton Paperbacks) (Taschenbuch)
A bargain anthology that includes extended selections from well-known and lesser-known Chinese works, with brief historical introductions and notes. There is a companion volume covering Indian literature.
Helfen Sie anderen Kunden bei der Suche nach den hilfreichsten Rezensionen
5.0 von 5 Sternen
Source Book in Chinese Philosophy,
Von Marilyn H. Dorato (New York City) - Alle meine Rezensionen ansehen
Rezension bezieht sich auf: A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy (Princeton Paperbacks) (Taschenbuch)
Dr. Chan was my college Asian philosophy professor so I used the book under special circumstances. As I recall, it was to be a beginning for those interested in the subject and was not intended to satisfy those further along in their studies. He was always receptive to differing views, and I think, would have been pleased to argue his points. He might be called conservative, but it was not easy for intellectuals still stuck in Mao's China as he was as a young man. He told us of having to read in the toilet so no one would know. The book is very simply written, easy for a novice to grasp and structured in such a way as to encourage discussion about the various philosophers. I recommend it for those with a budding interest in the subject. It gives a good overview and would encourage most readers to go on. No book should be read without the possibility of questioning what it contains just as no teacher should ever be regarded as the ultimate authority.
Helfen Sie anderen Kunden bei der Suche nach den hilfreichsten Rezensionen
Sagen Sie Ihre Meinung zu diesem Artikel: Eigene Rezension erstellen
|
Die neuesten Kundenrezensionen |
|
Das Forum zu diesem Produkt
Fragen stellen, Meinungen austauschen, Einblicke gewinnen Aktive Diskussionen in ähnlichen Foren
Kundendiskussionen durchsuchen
|
Ähnliche Foren
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|