In weniger als einer Minute können Sie mit dem Lesen von Sir George Martin auf Ihrem Kindle beginnen. Sie haben noch keinen Kindle? Hier kaufen.

An Ihren Kindle oder ein anderes Gerät senden

 
 
 

Kostenlos testen

Jetzt kostenlos reinlesen

An Ihren Kindle oder ein anderes Gerät senden

Lesen Sie Bücher auf Ihrem Computer oder auf anderen Mobilgeräten mit unseren GRATIS Kindle Lese-Apps.
Sir George Martin: The Fifth Beatle or the Architect of the Phenomenon of the Beatles?
 
 

Sir George Martin: The Fifth Beatle or the Architect of the Phenomenon of the Beatles? [Kindle Edition]

Lin Flanagan

Kindle-Preis: EUR 4,23 Inkl. MwSt. und kostenloser drahtloser Lieferung über Amazon Whispernet


Produktbeschreibungen

Kurzbeschreibung

Sir George Martin produced almost all of the Beatles recordings between 1962 and 1970. With the exception of a volatile period during the creation of the Let it Be album, from which he was largely absent, his contribution was far greater than that of a mere supervisor. His work as the group's record producer involved crucial roles as a manager, arranger, composer, performer and mentor.

His importance to the Beatles' music is apparent throughout the three recognised periods in the group's career. During the first period, which began with their signing to Parlophone in 1962 and ended with the Rubber Soul album, he transformed them from a local club act into a good, but stylistically typical, pop group. This was followed by a period of musical innovation, under Martin's guidance, which included the seminal album Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band. The third period, which began with the The Beatles and continued through to the group's end in 1970, saw a reduction in his control and was consequently volatile, antagonistic and ultimately self-destructive for the Beatles. This is clearly reflected in the inconsistency of their music during this era.

George Martin is one of a handful of individuals who are frequently and contentiously acclaimed as 'The Fifth Beatle'. However, few fans are aware of the actual evidence which substantiates the producer's entitlement above any other figures. With reference to the three periods in the Beatles' career, this book examines Martin's pivotal contribution to the Beatles' music through his many roles, and justifies the validity of his label of 'The Fifth Beatle'. By uncovering the magnitude of his input into the music that was recorded by the group, particularly in the areas for which they are revered, this book also reveals why it is more accurate to recognise Martin in a much greater and more crucial role, as the most important individual to be involved, and ultimately as the architect of the phenomenon of the Beatles.

Produktinformation

  • Format: Kindle Edition
  • Dateigröße: 243 KB
  • Seitenzahl der Print-Ausgabe: 127 Seiten
  • Verkauf durch: Amazon Media EU S.à r.l.
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • ASIN: B005UAKMQM
  • Text-to-Speech (Vorlesemodus): Aktiviert

  •  Ist der Verkauf dieses Produkts für Sie nicht akzeptabel?

Mehr über den Autor

Lin Flanagan
Entdecken Sie Bücher, lesen Sie über Autoren und mehr

Besuchen Sie die Seite von Lin Flanagan auf Amazon

Tags

 (Was ist das?)
Bei einem Tag handelt es sich um ein Schlagwort, das zum Produkt passt.
Tags erleichtern allen Kunden die Suche und die Sortierung ihrer Lieblingsprodukte.
 

Kundenrezensionen

Es gibt noch keine Kundenrezensionen auf Amazon.de
5 Sterne
4 Sterne
3 Sterne
2 Sterne
1 Sterne
Die hilfreichsten Kundenrezensionen auf Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com:  3 Rezensionen
Flawed analysis of George Martin's contributions to the Beatles 15. April 2012
Von Ricardo A. Lopez - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format:Kindle Edition|Von Amazon bestätigter Kauf
The purpose of this book is to argue that the Beatles would have never been more than just a competent club group if George Martin had not been their producer. The author uses a series of examples based on specific contributions that Martin made to the Beatles' recordings as an arranger, producer, and performer (mostly as a keyboard player) to support the main argument. There are serious problems with this book. First of all, the evidence presented is essentially anecdotal evidence based on just a few cases in which Martin made a significant contribution. Second, although the Beatles became popular due to their recordings, the group became universally known thanks to their songs, which are the result of the members' contributions rather than the producer's work. Beatles songs have been widely covered by many artists because of their beauty and appeal, not because of how well Martin played the keyboard in some of the recorded versions of the songs. Third, the book is very repetitive. For example, it says that the White Album is a very inconsistent album several times. Fourth, some of the claims made by the author are controversial, to say the least. Following the example of the White Album, while the author says it is an inconsistent album many others have a very different opinion (The Rolling Stones magazine ranked this album as the 10th best album of all time). Fifth, the author tries to emphasize the importance of Martin by diminishing the role of the Beatles, or by pointing out their limitations in performing certain parts of the songs. Moreover, for the author, the contributions of Martin were always crucial in making the record stronger. In other words, it seems that Martin's contributions were always important and helped to overcome any deficiencies that the Beatles may have suffered as musicians or composers. These claims are just too strong. None of the Beatles, or even the same Martin, has ever said that the producer was that essential for their success of their records. Of course, we will never know what would have happened if the Beatles had used a different producer, but judging by the big success of the individual members after the group's breakup (and also by the success of Beatles' records in which Martin did not participate actively), it is possible to argue that Beatles would still have been very big had they used a different producer. Finally, the book does not add any new information about the Beatles that we did not know from other sources. The book concludes by saying that Martin should be seen not just a the fifth Beatle, but rather as the architect of the success of the Beatles. All Beatles fans love the work that Martin did with the Beatles, and also recognize the importance of his contributions, but to say he was the single responsible person for the success and immortality of the group is completely wrong and inconsistent with the hundreds of books and academic papers that analyze the music of the group.
3 von 5 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
Worth reading 3. November 2011
Von Ronald J. Fabian - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format:Kindle Edition|Von Amazon bestätigter Kauf
But the author's credibility was diminished when he wrote that "A Hard Day's Night" was a Lennon and McCartney song when it was a pure Lennon song. He needlessly diminishes the Beatles while attempting to needlessly inflate George Martin's role in te creation of Beatles music. Any true "fan" knows that Martin created the melody for the guitar lead on "Michelle.". Neither the Beatles nor Martin ever denied his crucial role. That he played on various songs certainly led to more complete -- even better -- records than there would have been without him. He was always very realistic about his role. But the songs were created by the Beatles. He certainly added wonderful icing to the cake but the cake was not his. He was an extraordinary and rare producer and arranger but he wasn't a Beatle. The author often mentions how unprofessional the Beatles were in their performances. Perhaps he'd care to watch their incredible appearance on "Shindig" when they performed "I'm a Loser" & "Kansas City" which are astounding and outstanding. Or perhaps he missed McCartney's statement about how much of the arrangement of. "Walrus" was actually Lennon's work. Or perhaps he should consider how much Harrison's hand was in Lennon/McCartney's work (e.g., the 6th chord used in "She Loves You" to which Martin objected - glad they didn't listen to him on that one). Anyway, and to paraphrase Lennon, how many Martin songs do we listen to today? Can you name one? Martin's role in Beatle music was crucial but it was Beatle music. The best example of this is the truly horrible string arrangement on "She's Leaving Home," which sucks & which Martin did not write. Being the producer & arranger for the Beatles took tremendous talent & skill. One does not need to diminish the talent of others to realize that. Finally, I'm glad I read this book - any serious Beatle (or Martin) fan will enjoy it.
1 von 4 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
A very interesting read 26. Oktober 2011
Von H.A. Owens - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format:Kindle Edition|Von Amazon bestätigter Kauf
This is a very revealing analysis of George Martin's contribution to the success of the Beatles. As a producer, arranger, manager, performer and mentor. The author is a music educator and performer and is well qualified to deliver commentary and knowledge on this subject. His analisys is very detailed. It is easy to discern that a great deal of research went into this book. The author supports his conclusions with an abundance of facts and musical analisys. It is easy to come away from this read( I did) concluding George Martin was not the fifth Beatle, he was in fact the first. I have heard several raw tracks of what John, Paul and George took to Martin and I marvel at what he was able to produce as a product. The author also expounds on the difference between the Beatles' songs as music and the musical product. Very technical analysis and a fun read. If you are a Beatles fan this book belongs in your library.

Kunden diskutieren

Das Forum zu diesem Produkt
Diskussion Antworten Jüngster Beitrag
Noch keine Diskussionen

Fragen stellen, Meinungen austauschen, Einblicke gewinnen
Neue Diskussion starten
Thema:
Erster Beitrag:
Eingabe des Log-ins
 


Aktive Diskussionen in ähnlichen Foren
Kundendiskussionen durchsuchen
Alle Amazon-Diskussionen durchsuchen
   
Ähnliche Foren


Ähnliche Artikel finden


Anhand des Sachgebietes nach ähnlichen Produkten suchen:





Das bedeutet, jeder Titel/Artikel muss zu Sachgebiet 1 UND zu Sachgebiet 2 UND... gehören.