Dr. Fletcher's _The Search for Nefertiti_ has much going for it. The book begins with her telling of how she became an Egyptologist - interesting in its own right, if not directly related to the primary focus of the book. She then goes into great detail about Egyptology itself, explaining how we know what we think we know about ancient Egypt and how frequently conclusions of earlier Egyptologists are wrong - and sometimes downright sexist as well. This, too was interesting reading. But Dr. Fletcher really hits her stride when she begins to discuss the 18th dynasty - the "Amarna Period."
The history of Egypt's New Kingdom is fascinating, as it was during this period of time that Egypt's power was at its zenith. Dr. Fletcher does a marvelous job describing the era. In particular, much detail is paid to Akhenaton and his wife, Nefertiti - the political climate, the religious changes that were taking place during his (their?) rule, and a glimpse at what is supposed regarding life at court. This is the strongest portion of the book, and had it ended here, I would have given it 4 stars.
Yet Dr. Fletcher goes on to postulate that a mummy (previously described as "the Younger Woman") who dates from the 18th dynasty is that of Nefertiti. Certainly this is plausable; but the evidence that is used to support Dr. Fletcher's claim is circumstantial and tenuous at best. For this, I had to deduct a star.
In the end, it provides a wealth of information about not only the field of Egyptology, but also the reign of Akhenaton and the 18th dynasty, and for this it is well worth attention. Her conclusions regarding the "discovery" of Nefertiti, however, are wanting.