Möchten Sie verkaufen? Hier verkaufen
Der Artikel ist in folgender Variante leider nicht verfügbar
Keine Abbildung vorhanden für
Farbe:
Keine Abbildung vorhanden

 
Den Verlag informieren!
Ich möchte dieses Buch auf dem Kindle lesen.

Sie haben keinen Kindle? Hier kaufen oder eine gratis Kindle Lese-App herunterladen.

Science and Sanity: An Introduction to Non-Aristotelian Systems and General Semantics [Englisch] [Gebundene Ausgabe]

Alfred Korzybski
4.8 von 5 Sternen  Alle Rezensionen anzeigen (6 Kundenrezensionen)

Erhältlich bei diesen Anbietern.



Kunden, die diesen Artikel angesehen haben, haben auch angesehen


Produktinformation

  • Gebundene Ausgabe
  • Verlag: Inst of General Semantics; Auflage: 5 Sub (Januar 1995)
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • ISBN-10: 0937298018
  • ISBN-13: 978-0937298015
  • Größe und/oder Gewicht: 16,3 x 23,8 cm
  • Durchschnittliche Kundenbewertung: 4.8 von 5 Sternen  Alle Rezensionen anzeigen (6 Kundenrezensionen)
  • Amazon Bestseller-Rang: Nr. 286.501 in Englische Bücher (Siehe Top 100 in Englische Bücher)

Welche anderen Artikel kaufen Kunden, nachdem sie diesen Artikel angesehen haben?


In diesem Buch (Mehr dazu)
Einleitungssatz
Science and Sanity: An Introduction to Non-aristotelian Systems and General Semantics, first published in October, 1933, was intended to be a textbook showing how in modern scientific methods we can find factors of sanity, to be tested empirically. Lesen Sie die erste Seite
Mehr entdecken
Wortanzeiger
Ausgewählte Seiten ansehen
Buchdeckel | Copyright | Inhaltsverzeichnis | Auszug | Stichwortverzeichnis | Rückseite
Hier reinlesen und suchen:

Eine digitale Version dieses Buchs im Kindle-Shop verkaufen

Wenn Sie ein Verleger oder Autor sind und die digitalen Rechte an einem Buch haben, können Sie die digitale Version des Buchs in unserem Kindle-Shop verkaufen. Weitere Informationen

Kundenrezensionen

3 Sterne
0
2 Sterne
0
1 Sterne
0
4.8 von 5 Sternen
4.8 von 5 Sternen
Die hilfreichsten Kundenrezensionen
10 von 10 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
This book should probably be on any short list of the century's most influential books but would, ironically, never make a list of most read books. A significant number of people did read and internalize the book's message and Korzibsky's thought thus found its way into a number of diverse fields. But despite the wide dissimination of the book's message, the book itself, because it is so dense and difficult, has never had a wide reading audience. In fact, early critics made the point that a book about language and meaning should not have such difficult language that its meaning is difficult to understand. Yet this is the problem that Korzibski faced - having to use language to demonstrate the inherent limitations and dangers of language.

I have read the book, having come to it from a number of popular treatments of Korzybski's work. These at least provided a framework for understanding what otherwise might have been lost to me in the author's stiff prose. The book's most basic message, that 'the map is not the territory' (the Word is not the Thing it represents), can seem trivial when stated simply. However, only a little analysis will suffice to show how easily even very bright people fall into the trap of the 'Is of identity' - the semantic error that is inherent in the syllogistic form of reasoning that makes use of statements of the form 'All A are B, C is A, therefore C is B'. Note that 'is' suggests, and indeed often is taken to be, a statement of identity - that category A is identical in some ways, to category B. This is false. As words, these simply stand for, or 'point to' certain things, which themselves are identical only on the verbal level - the level of conceptual thought - not on the non-verbal level of external reality. Because we must use language to think and communicate with others about that external reality, we always run the risk of confusing what we say about things with the reality that exits independently of our thought.

The full implications of this line of reasoning is vast and extremely important. From the easy to see fallacy of reification, where having a name for something lends it a reality which in fact might not exist, to more complex issues having to do with the levels of abstraction inherent in various forms of thinking/speaking, this book touches on such a multitude of important topics that it is impossible to sum up in a few words.

Those new to the concept of General Semantics might do well to start with one of the popular treatments of the subject such as Hiakawa's Language in Thought and Action. But if one moves on to the primary text the rewards will be many. It 'is' a difficult book, but deeply rewarding

War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich?
5.0 von 5 Sternen Semantics from the world of 1933 26. März 2007
Von bernie
An interesting view that is not to be overlooked. As in physics we changed or concepts from Newtonian (space and time) to Einstein or non-Newtonian (space/time). We see this in any fields and some of us embrace the change and see how infinite our views can still work; others of us resist knowing that there is something fundamentally wrong if you can not put your finger on it.

Korzybski opens up our mind and world to the possibilities of Non-Aristotellian systems and general semantics.

"If one wishes to obtain a definite answer to Nature one must attack the question from a more general and less selfish point of view"

M. PLANCK
War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich?
2 von 3 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
5.0 von 5 Sternen Arguably the greatest book of the 20th Century. 9. Juni 1997
Von Ein Kunde
The first edition of this book appeared in 1933, and the fifth and current edition in 1994.
Russell Meyers, the noted neurologist, once described Science And Sanity as "The most profound, insightful, and globally significant book I have ever read."
Personally, I can't think of anything that has affected me more than Korzybski's text, with the possible exception of the movie, "Swedish Fly Girls."
A dazzling display of knowledge is Science & Sanity -- a great synthesis of learning -- an achievement comparable in some ways to that of Aristotle.
Sorry, but it does involve some technicalities about chemistry, physics, and science in general. It's a book that affected Alvin Toffler for one, Margaret Mead, Buckminster Fuller, and so on. Highly recommended.
War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich?
Möchten Sie weitere Rezensionen zu diesem Artikel anzeigen?
Waren diese Rezensionen hilfreich?   Wir wollen von Ihnen hören.

Kunden diskutieren

Das Forum zu diesem Produkt
Diskussion Antworten Jüngster Beitrag
Noch keine Diskussionen

Fragen stellen, Meinungen austauschen, Einblicke gewinnen
Neue Diskussion starten
Thema:
Erster Beitrag:
Eingabe des Log-ins
 


Aktive Diskussionen in ähnlichen Foren
Kundendiskussionen durchsuchen
Alle Amazon-Diskussionen durchsuchen
   
Ähnliche Foren


Lieblingslisten


Ähnliche Artikel finden


Ihr Kommentar