Scalia: A Court of One und über 1,5 Millionen weitere Bücher verfügbar für Amazon Kindle. Erfahren Sie mehr
EUR 22,11
  • Statt: EUR 22,38
  • Sie sparen: EUR 0,27 (1%)
  • Alle Preisangaben inkl. MwSt.
Nur noch 1 auf Lager (mehr ist unterwegs).
Verkauf und Versand durch Amazon.
Geschenkverpackung verfügbar.
Möchten Sie verkaufen?
Zur Rückseite klappen Zur Vorderseite klappen
Anhören Wird wiedergegeben... Angehalten   Sie hören eine Probe der Audible-Audioausgabe.
Weitere Informationen
Alle 2 Bilder anzeigen

Scalia: A Court of One (Englisch) Gebundene Ausgabe – 10. Juni 2014

Alle 3 Formate und Ausgaben anzeigen Andere Formate und Ausgaben ausblenden
Amazon-Preis Neu ab Gebraucht ab
Kindle Edition
"Bitte wiederholen"
Gebundene Ausgabe
"Bitte wiederholen"
EUR 22,11
EUR 1,45 EUR 2,34
11 neu ab EUR 1,45 6 gebraucht ab EUR 2,34
Jeder kann Kindle Bücher lesen — selbst ohne ein Kindle-Gerät — mit der KOSTENFREIEN Kindle App für Smartphones, Tablets und Computer.


Mehr über die Autoren

Entdecken Sie Bücher, lesen Sie über Autoren und mehr



“A compelling biography of one of the most conservative, combative, and bombastic Supreme Court Justices in our nation’s history. . . . A terrific start to understanding Justice Scalia and his impact on American constitutional law.” (Kevin J. Hamilton The Seattle Times)

“[A] fair-minded biography. . . . Murphy's deeper and more scholarly focus on Scalia offers . . . an opportunity to study one justice's progress from the Reagan administration's great right hope to the more problematic character he's become.” (Paul M. Barrett The San Francisco Chronicle)

“May be the most exhaustive treatment of a sitting justice ever written. . . . Scalia is a skeptical, often critical look at its subject, but free of snark; it does its readers the service of taking Scalia’s ideas seriously.” (Jeff Shesol The New York Times Book Review)

“An intellectual biography of one of [the Supreme Court’s] most colorful members. . . . A lucid account of a wide variety of topics through the lens of judicial biography.” (Alexander Tsesis The Chicago Tribune)

“Thoroughly researched and accessible . . . a lively and informative account of Scalia’s upbringing; his education at Georgetown University, where he excelled in debate; his academic career at the University of Virginia and the University of Chicago; his work in the Nixon administration in the offices of telecommunication policy and legal counsel (in the Department of Justice); and his years on the bench.” (Glenn C. Altschuler The Boston Globe)

"In Bruce Allen Murphy, Scalia has met a timely and unintimidated biographer ready to probe. . . . In his view, understanding one of the most dazzling and polarizing jurists on the Supreme Court entails, above all, examining the inevitably murky relationship between judicial decision making and religious devotion. . . . Murphy does not shrink from adjudicating Scalia’s dueling public claims: that separating faith from public life is impossible and, at the same time, that he himself has done just that on the Court." (Dahlia Lithwick The Atlantic)

“Murphy does Scalia the unwarranted honor of treating originalism seriously but does not flinch when he gets to the bottom line: At least in Scalia's hands, originalism is not a method of judicial interpretation, it is a device to import his values into the Constitution.” (Jim Newton The Los Angeles Times)

"Endlessly fascinating . . . Scalia offers a deep examination of the man and his work, one certain to ignite the passions of partisans in our increasingly polarized nation." (Jay Strafford Richmond Times-Dispatch)

“A deeply probing biography of the controversial Supreme Court justice. . . . Murphy moves case by case in an evenhanded, thoroughgoing study.” (Kirkus Reviews)

“Murphy gives Scalia’s intellect and influence its due. . . . What is strong in Scalia — and what probably irks so many fans of Scalia — is that Murphy does a good job poking holes in Scalia’s strict textual interpretation of the Constitution.” (Tom Deignan Newark Star-Ledger)

“In the long run, will Justice Scalia’s legacy be that of a solo pilot as the title of this book suggests? Or will it be that of a jurist who reinvigorated an interpretive idea that launched a thousand jurisprudential ships? Will his unwillingness to build consensus at the expense of his orthodoxy be judged as an egotistical mistake or a principled advantage?. . . . Scalia provides a rich and needed body of information by which to begin to answer such questions.” (Ronald K.L. Collins The Washington Independent Review of Books)

"Comprehensively researched, accessible, and fascinating. . . . Recommended for friend and foe alike of Nino to undersatnd just what the Supreme Court is up to." (Library Journal (starred review))

“A highly engaged, well-researched analysis of a brash justice whose single-mindedness may ultimately reduce his legacy.” (Booklist (starred review))

“[A] penetrating biography. . . . Murphy's thoughtful analysis of Scalia's intellectual journey shows just how difficult it is to straitjacket the Constitution within a narrow interpretation.” (Publishers Weekly)

“A significant achievement.” (Michael O'Donnell Washington Monthly)

Über den Autor und weitere Mitwirkende

Bruce Allen Murphy is the Fred Morgan Kirby Professor of Civil Rights at Lafayette College in Easton, Pennsylvania, where he teaches American constitutional law and civil rights and liberties, American politics, and biographical writing. He is the author of Scalia; The Brandeis-Frankfurter Connection: The Secret Political Activities of Two Supreme Court Justices; Fortas: The Rise and Ruin of a Supreme Court Justice; and Wild Bill: The Legend and Life of William O. Douglas. Murphy lives with his wife in the Lehigh Valley, Pennsylvania.

In diesem Buch (Mehr dazu)
Ausgewählte Seiten ansehen
Buchdeckel | Copyright | Inhaltsverzeichnis | Auszug | Stichwortverzeichnis
Hier reinlesen und suchen:


Es gibt noch keine Kundenrezensionen auf
5 Sterne
4 Sterne
3 Sterne
2 Sterne
1 Sterne

Die hilfreichsten Kundenrezensionen auf (beta) 30 Rezensionen
67 von 85 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
The Rob Ford of SCOTUS 10. Juni 2014
Von David Wineberg - Veröffentlicht auf
Format: Kindle Edition
For about 150 pages of this intense, revealing and quite excellent book, Antonin "Nino" Scalia is a brilliant student, a hard worker, an unbeatable debater and an all around great guy, "very kind hearted and low key." Scalia was the golden one. As the only child of Italian immigrants, he was spoiled. That none of his aunts and uncles living nearby had any children at all only made it worse. At school, his sterling academic record allowed him the unrestrained praise of everyone. Unfortunately, his Catholic school also instilled in him the rule that it is not possible to separate religious life from intellectual life, which colored his thinking very prejudicially. Still, as a young judge, his digging led to insights and clarity deeper than the average judge's decisions.

But when he got to the Supreme Court at age 50, that all changed overnight. Now the junior justice, he was frustrated at not being the star, not being the leader, not being the pacesetter. This could not be allowed to stand.

In a pathological effort to have the last word in any legal argument, Scalia scoured legal concordances and when that was unsatisfactory, he went to the history books and even fiction - quoting Shakespeare or Orwell as his source - to make a point either different than the other justices, or just differently. He was on a one man crusade to be right, and those who would not join him were criminally wrong. That would often be the entire rest of the court. The result was total polarization, minimal co-operation, and Scalia issuing a dissenting opinion, even when he agreed on the result. According to Murphy, those dissents (called Ninograms or Ninofits) would often be ad hominem attacks on other justices, whose opinions he did not share. This brought the court down to a new, undignified and uncomfortable level of one sided playground fighting. Eventually, other judges responded and retorted. But Scalia always insisted on having the last word, so it was pointless.

When it suited his purposes, Scalia abandoned the law and the Constitution in favor of arguments based on "everybody does it". His dissents sometimes read like editorials rather than judicial logic. He became a Court of One, writing decisions for himself. In order to cement his different approach, he championed a theory that put him in conflict with everyone else: "What was the most plausible meaning of the words of the Constitution to the society that adopted it (as decided by Scalia alone) -regardless of the Framers might secretly have intended it?" This made him attempt to put 21st century America's reality back to 1787, while at the same time ignoring the actual intent of the men who wrote the rules, or the political/social context. This is the judicial equivalent of Einstein's fruitless search for one simple rule to explain the universe. Scalia's "textualism and originalism" theory can only cause grief.

Fellow conservative Judge Richard Posner described it most succinctly: "The range of historical references ... is breathtaking, but it not evidence of disinterested historical inquiry. It is evidence of the ability of well-staffed courts to produce snow jobs."

I found it frustrating that Murphy did not provide a scorecard. While he did show that other conservative justices voted along with Scalia less every year, he never showed how many dissents Scalia wrote, and what percentage of the total cases heard that represented every year. Because Murphy could just be obsessing on the numerous outrageous acts by Scalia. And though I doubt they are merely exceptions to suit this book, I would have liked to know the overall depth of the disaster. Murphy also spends too much ink on setups and repetition, reintroducing people and events several times. Nonetheless, he does a magnificent job showing how Scalia "evolved" from decade to decade, and what that meant for jurisprudence in those years.

The obvious irony of it all is that Scalia made an absolute conservative majority when he took his seat in 1986. He aggravated, insulted, divided and split the conservatives, pushing them to the center, and so obviated any possibility of achieving his conservative goals. All by himself. And was bitter about it!

Scalia's antics on the bench and in public served to polarize and politicize the Supreme Court, most notably in Gore v. Bush, where the five Republican appointees outvoted the four Democrats to decide the presidential election by themselves. That politicization is shameful, demeaning and belittling to an important, impartial institution, and a horrible legacy Scalia does not for a moment acknowledge. He brooks no criticism from any quarter. In his words, he doesn't care; he has "tenure."

Another low blow was his overt plan for the Chief Justice's spot. Even as Rehnquist was ailing, Scalia, under the watchful eye of his declared fan GW Bush, began openly campaigning for Rehnquist's job, further debasing the currency of the court. His decisions and dissents that year were colored by it, confusing his declining number of admirers. It was so embarrassing he wasn't even shortlisted.

Scalia is clearly working to become the most famous Supreme Court Justice in history. Unfortunately, that fame will be due to his lack of co-operation, his need to be the leader regardless of how he got there, and the resulting torture for the American people with the often incomprehensible decisions. He will not be remembered kindly or grandly.

Don't shoot the messenger.

David Wineberg
11 von 12 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
A Remarkable Study of Justice Scalia: perceptive; incisive; comprehensive 6. Juli 2014
Von Ronald H. Clark - Veröffentlicht auf
Format: Gebundene Ausgabe Verifizierter Kauf
This is the fourth judicial study by Professor Murphy I have read. The three previous volumes I felt excessively focused on sensational dimensions of their subjects, especially the volumes on Justices Fortas and William O. Douglas (" Wild Bill"). Not to say these were not substantial studies, but the sensational elements detracted attention from Murphy's solid scholarship. I am delighted to say that I have no such qualms about this substantial (500 pages plus notes and bibliography) and extremely valuable bio of Justice Antonin Scalia. It is outstanding in a number of ways.

For me, the book's greatest asset is its meticulous analysis of how Justice Scalia developed his various interpretive theories--probably his most lasting achievement. One can read long articles on this topic, but what Murphy has done is to trace this development over time, context by context, as the bio unfolds. I found myself having a much more comprehensive understanding of Scalia's approaches (yes, he does "evolve" over time) than before. For Scalia and judicial conservatives generally, methodology is everything. Murphy also carefully differentiates Scalia's positions from those of Judge Bork and Justice Thomas, as well as others.

Murphy also tackles the toughest issue about Scalia--could he have been a more influential figure? On the one hand, clearly his originalist theory has had a substantial impact on how the Constitution is interpreted by judges, scholars, and others. Yet, on the other, his explosive personality relative to his Court colleagues has cost him the ability to become the conservative leader of the Court. Justice Kennedy and (Murphy suggests after the Obamacare decision) the Chief Justice may now rightly claim that title. Yet, although Scalia can charm many birds out of their trees, Murphy suggests that his attacks on colleagues and controversial speeches cost him whatever little chance he had of succeeding Rehnquist as Chief in 2005. A very interesting issue.

One measure of solid judicial biography is whether you feel you have a solid grasp on the personality of the subject. Murphy scores in this category as well. He carefully follows Scalia through his youth, legal education, early practice career, academic teaching, and eventually into government service. His chapters on Scalia's service in the Office of Legal Counsel at DOJ during the Ford Administrative afforded me helpful insights into his undying dedication to the expansion of presidential power--which still pops up from time to time. His views on regulation developed during his stay at the Administrative Conference and the American Enterprise Institute are important to understanding his views as a Justice. The only thing missing from Murphy's analysis is much about Scalia's family/private life, with the exception of Murphy's diligent examination of the role of Scalia's Roman Catholicism in impacting his character and judicial behavior. With now six Catholic justices, five of whom are generally quite conservative, this is a crucial topic which Murphy treats with scholarly professionalism.

There are many other pluses to the book as well. Murphy selects the cases he discusses carefully, and integrates them into his narrative so smoothly that general readers will grasp his points. Murphy certainly includes some critics of Scalia as well, especially Judge Posner who continues to wield a highly critical pen regarding Scalia, and pretty much deconstructed Scalia's major book, "Reading Law.". Murphy also takes on several crucial issues relating to Scalia's conduct on and off the Court. Especially the issue of what standards govern judicial recusals by Justices becomes important given the calls for Scalia to recuse himself after his famous hunting trip with Vice President Cheney. A related topic is what limits should Justices follow in making public statements that relate to the Court. An avid maker of speeches and public comments, Scalia has been repeatedly criticized for discussing his views on issues that might come before the Court.

This is a book where you need to read the end notes as you go along. Murphy discusses some of his most important insights in the notes (e.g., judicial recusals); since there are 75 pages of notes, there is much buried treasure found therein. His extensive bibliography, covering books, interviews, oral histories, speeches and public appearances, archive collections, and internet sources is enormously helpful. So we now have two fine book-length studies of Scalia, Murphy's and Joan Biskupic's "American Original." While many such as myself will remain critical of Scalia and his interpretive theories, we are now at least in a much better position to understand this most perplexing Justice as he approaches 80.
14 von 18 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
well researched and well written 24. Juni 2014
Von Andrew Boufford - Veröffentlicht auf
Format: Gebundene Ausgabe
I will admit I have not finished the book. I am a little over a hundred pages into it. In fact, I am at the point of his appointment to SCOTUS. I am also a liberal, and came into this endeavor not a big fan of Scalia's. However, as a result of reading this biography I find myself liking the man. Don't get me wrong, I am not a convert, however, it is hard not to respect and admire his intellect and sharp legal mind. I am not an originalist either, but I do find myself fascinated by his approach to constitutional interpretation, an approach that has to be taken seriously. It may be premature to write this, but I felt compelled based on some of the reviews that I think are just unfair. One reviewer made the assertion that the book is not well researched. I respectfully disagree. The endnotes are extensive and Murphy used a wide range of sources, both primary and secondary. He spent 8 years researching the book. Keep in mind this is an intellectual biography focusing in on Scalia's jurisprudence. The author looked at the dozens of public interviews with Scalia, the dozens of speeches and public appearances, and the endless number of opinions he wrote as a justice and circuit court judge. Most of this material is open source material and part of the public record. Not sure a personal interview with the author would shed any more light on his judicial philosophy. Anyway, for what its worth, that's my take thus far.
11 von 14 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
A Critique more than Biography 1. Juli 2014
Von ernest schusky - Veröffentlicht auf
Format: Kindle Edition
When I heard about this book' I could hardly wait for it because I thought it would confirm my prejudices about Scalia. Murphy does share my bias, but I was disappointed that he at times failed to provide evidence for his accusations of Scalia's biases. Indeed, I felt in some places the book was more polemic than factual, and at times (not for very long) I felt sympahty for Scalia.

I did find the book valuable for its explanation of Scalia's doctrine of "originalism''. However, it strikes me as more than coincidental that Scalia can find the Founding Father's more often than not supporting Catholic doctrine when there was considerable antipathy toward the religion during Colonial times.
1 von 1 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
A Valuable But One-Sided Biography 5. Oktober 2014
Von Greg Bassham - Veröffentlicht auf
Format: Gebundene Ausgabe
There are currently two biographies of Justice Scalia, each with its distinctive strengths and weaknesses. The first was Joan Biskupic's "American Original: The Life and Constitution of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia" (Sarah Crichton Books, 2009). Biskupic's book is well-written, balanced, and based on extensive personal interviews with Justice Scalia himself, his family, and colleagues. It is not particularly strong, however, on Scalia's early life, his judicial philosophy, and his intellectual contribution.

Murphy's biography is longer, more in-depth, and more extensively researched than Biskupic's, but is less readable and makes no pretense to be even-handed. Murphy, a political science professor at Lafayette College, specializes in hard-hitting exposes of Supreme Court Justices. His earlier biographies of Abe Fortas and William O. Douglas, though useful and well-researched, spared readers no tawdry details of their subjects' flawed characters. This book adopts a similar kind of "gotcha" approach.

Unlike Biskupic, Murphy conducted few personal interviews. Instead, he draws heavily on public sources and archival records. The result is a scholarly but somewhat plodding and relentlessly critical biography. It is really the tale of two Scalias. The first is Scalia the Golden Boy: the gregarious, straight-laced Italian immigrant's son, who finished first in his class in high school and Georgetown, graduated Summa Cum Laude from Harvard Law School, rose quickly in his early career as a corporate lawyer, law professor, and government official, raised a model family, stayed true to his faith and his principles, and seemed to do everything right. The second Scalia is of the Golden-Boy-Corrupted. As Murphy tells it, a far less attractive Scalia emerges when he gets a seat on the federal bench. He becomes nastier and more combative. His love of fame and money leads him to give provocative speeches, teach legal seminars in posh settings, and engage in other conduct that Murphy considers unbecoming of federal judges. He increasingly allows his conservative religious beliefs to influence his judicial decisions. His vitriolic personal attacks and rigid refusal to compromise make it impossible for him to build effective coalitions with his conservative judicial colleagues. As power goes to his head, his ethical standards loosen, and he refuses to recuse himself from cases in which his impartiality is clearly in question. Though he professes to practice judicial restraint and fidelity to the Constitution's original meaning, Scalia's decisions become increasingly political and result-driven. Finally, the ultimate low point: Bush v. Gore: Consumed by a desire to become Chief Justice and appalled at the prospect of a Gore presidency with all that would mean for the future of the country and the Court, Scalia betrays all of his professed judicial principles and hands the presidency to Bush in a brazen act of politics that was nothing short of a judicial coup d'etat.

Readers will of course differ on how much of this latter tale they want to buy in to. Having read Biskupic's more balanced account, I found Murphy's narrative to be selective, one-sided, and far too often based on speculation rather than hard evidence. Peering into Scalia's mind with his psychic X-ray powers, Murphy sees little but ambition, hypocrisy, duplicity, and conceit.

Besides being one-sided, Murphy's book is too long. Readers hoping above all to get a feel for Scalia the man (and his family) will be disappointed by Murphy's heavy focus on Scalia's public life, his constant preoccupation with controversy, and by his slow-paced year-by-year rundown of Supreme Court decisions.

Murphy's book is also surprisingly thin on Scalia's intellectual contributions. There is very little on the origins of Scalia's textualist approach to reading statutes and constitutional texts; how Scalia elaborates and defends that approach; and the impact of his textualist approach on legal scholarship and the nation's courts.

To his credit, Murphy's extensive research does bring out many new and interesting details about Scalia's life, particularly in his childhood, his career as a corporate lawyer in Cleveland, and his work in the Nixon and Ford administrations. This scholarly legwork gives the book real value despite the relentless and often unfair negativism.
Waren diese Rezensionen hilfreich? Wir wollen von Ihnen hören.