Rocks Of Ages und über 1,5 Millionen weitere Bücher verfügbar für Amazon Kindle. Erfahren Sie mehr


oder
Loggen Sie sich ein, um 1-Click® einzuschalten.
oder
Mit kostenloser Probeteilnahme bei Amazon Prime. Melden Sie sich während des Bestellvorgangs an. Erfahren Sie mehr
Alle Angebote
Möchten Sie verkaufen? Hier verkaufen
Der Artikel ist in folgender Variante leider nicht verfügbar
Keine Abbildung vorhanden für
Farbe:
Keine Abbildung vorhanden

 
Beginnen Sie mit dem Lesen von Rocks Of Ages auf Ihrem Kindle in weniger als einer Minute.

Sie haben keinen Kindle? Hier kaufen oder eine gratis Kindle Lese-App herunterladen.

Rocks of Ages: Science and Religion in the Fullness of Life [Englisch] [Taschenbuch]

Stephen Jay Gould
2.7 von 5 Sternen  Alle Rezensionen anzeigen (30 Kundenrezensionen)
Preis: EUR 11,99 kostenlose Lieferung. Siehe Details.
  Alle Preisangaben inkl. MwSt.
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
Nur noch 1 auf Lager (mehr ist unterwegs).
Verkauf und Versand durch Amazon. Geschenkverpackung verfügbar.
Lieferung bis Samstag, 25. Mai: Wählen Sie an der Kasse Morning-Express. Siehe Details.

Weitere Ausgaben

Amazon-Preis Neu ab Gebraucht ab
Kindle Edition EUR 7,52  
Gebundene Ausgabe --  
Taschenbuch EUR 11,99  
Hörkassette --  

Kurzbeschreibung

26. Februar 2002
Writing with bracing intelligence and clarity, internationally renowned evolutionist and bestselling author Stephen Jay Gould sheds new light on a dilemma that has plagued thinking people since the Renaissance: the rift between science and religion. Instead of choosing them, Gould asks, why not opt for a golden mean that accords dignity and distinction to each realm?

In his distinctively elegant style, Gould offers a lucid, contemporary principle that allows science and religion to coexist peacefully in a position of respectful noninterference. Science defines the natural world; religion our moral world in recognition of their separate spheres of influence. In exploring this thought-provoking concept, Gould delves into the history of science, sketching affecting portraits of scientists and moral leaders wrestling with matters of faith and reason. Stories of seminal figures such as Galileo, Darwin, and Thomas Henry Huxley make vivid his argument that individuals and cultures must cultivate both a life of the spirit and a life of rational inquiry in order to experience the fullness of being human.

In Rocks of Ages, Gould’s passionate humanism, ethical discernment, and erudition are fused to create a dazzling gem of contemporary cultural philosophy.

Hinweise und Aktionen

  • Studienbücher: Ob neu oder gebraucht, alle wichtigen Bücher für Ihr Studium finden Sie im großen Studium Special. Natürlich portofrei.


Kunden, die diesen Artikel angesehen haben, haben auch angesehen


Produktinformation

  • Taschenbuch: 256 Seiten
  • Verlag: Ballantine Books; Auflage: Reprint (26. Februar 2002)
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • ISBN-10: 034545040X
  • ISBN-13: 978-0345450401
  • Größe und/oder Gewicht: 1,3 x 12 x 20,8 cm
  • Durchschnittliche Kundenbewertung: 2.7 von 5 Sternen  Alle Rezensionen anzeigen (30 Kundenrezensionen)
  • Amazon Bestseller-Rang: Nr. 419.601 in Englische Bücher (Siehe Top 100 in Englische Bücher)
  • Komplettes Inhaltsverzeichnis ansehen

Mehr über den Autor

Entdecken Sie Bücher, lesen Sie über Autoren und mehr

Produktbeschreibungen

Amazon.de

Revered and eminently readable essayist Stephen Jay Gould has once again rendered the complex simple, this time mending the seeming split between the two "Rocks of Ages", science and religion. He quickly, and rightfully, admits that his thesis is not new, but one broadly accepted by many scientists and theologians. Gould begins by suggesting that Darwin has been misconstrued--that while some religious thinkers have used divinity to prove the impossibility of evolution, Darwin would have never done the reverse.

Gould eloquently lays out not "a merely diplomatic solution" to rectify the physical and metaphysical, but "a principled position on moral and intellectual grounds", central to which is the elegant concept of "non-overlapping magisteria". (Gould defines "magisteria" as a "four-bit" word meaning domain of authority in teaching.) Essentially, science and religion can't be unified, but neither should they be in conflict; each has its own discrete magisteria, the natural world belonging exclusively to science and the moral to religion.

Gould's argument is both lucid and convincing as he cites past religious and scientific greats (including a particularly touching section on Darwin himself). Regardless of your persuasions, religious or scientific, Gould holds up his end of the conversation with characteristic respect and intelligence. --Paul Hughes -- Dieser Text bezieht sich auf eine andere Ausgabe: Gebundene Ausgabe .

Pressestimmen

Gould is at his brilliant best... A truly convincing performance Guardian Convincingly argued and thought provoking-Gould must rank as one of the leading scientific essayists of his generation and, as ever, he is in total command of his subject matter. He steers a deft route through contentious waters, but manages to retain a humorous edge, that keeps the book both engaging and highly entertaining. Gould provides the literary magic to deliver a light-hearted read Irish Times Concise, eloquent and passionate. It is a marvellous work. Gould speaks clear, sound sense, and Rocks of Ages should be required reading not only for scientists and religious people, but for anybody who cares about the quest for meaning Independent This marvellous extended essay should have been the real lost book of the New Testament. Gould, arguably our greatest living popular science essayist, has many joyful enthusiasms. Among them are eternity, Charles Darwin and baseball-Gould has such insatiable and infectious enthusiasm for the intellectual challenge and fascination of being a mere speck in a vast universe Scotsman Rocks of Ages is easy and enjoyable to read. It contains many charming illustrations and interesting insights Sunday Telegraph

In diesem Buch (Mehr dazu)
Einleitungssatz
I WRITE THIS LITTLE BOOK to present a blessedly simple and entirely conventional resolution to an issue so laden with emotion and the burden of history that a clear path usually becomes overgrown by a tangle of contention and confusion. Lesen Sie die erste Seite
Mehr entdecken
Wortanzeiger
Ausgewählte Seiten ansehen
Buchdeckel | Copyright | Inhaltsverzeichnis | Auszug | Stichwortverzeichnis | Rückseite
Hier reinlesen und suchen:

Kundenrezensionen

Die hilfreichsten Kundenrezensionen
1 von 1 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
1.0 von 5 Sternen "NOMA"n's land 14. Dezember 1999
Format:Gebundene Ausgabe
Try as I might, I can find no redeeming features to this book. In the best of all worlds, I can imagine wise and thoughtful spiritualists peacefully coexisting with sensitive scientists, each honoring the part the other has to play in the grand scheme. But I am completely ignoring human nature when I do, as is Gould in this apparently shameless bid to capture our dollars.

We live in a world dominated by institutionalized everything - specifically institutionalized science, and institutionalized spirituality (which we call "religion"). If Dr. Gould left these institutions behind, and focused on the basic inquisitiveness of the human spirit, he might find opportunities for peaceful co-existence if not outright co-habitance. But this book is not about that. Gould sets science and religion side-by-side, and places an arbitrary wall between them - an invitation to conflict. Both these institutions consider the entire universe to be their rightful property.

So-called "NOMA" might work as a personal choice, whereby scientists raised in an orthodox religious environment can create, if they desire, a semblance of peace in their schizophrenic view of the universe. But to apply this model to group behavior is indefensable. And Gould doesn't even try.

One is left wondering, "Is this truly one of the great minds of our time?" But I'll be kind and simply say that this book is unworthy of the author's capabilities.

War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich?
1 von 1 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
3.0 von 5 Sternen Good, but not good enough 4. November 1999
Von Ein Kunde
Format:Gebundene Ausgabe
I like Gould. I think he's more right than wrong and definitely side with him in his arguments with Dawkins. But this book is timid. Gould makes his points adequately clearly, showing how NOMA is a reasonable way to deal with the differences between science and religion. His examples of religious thought on matters pertaining to science are apt and well-chosen. His examples of science encroaching on realms outside its authority, however, do not suffice. While he can and does cite specific examples of encroachment by religion, he limits his specific accusations against scientists to the period around WWI. Naming names might not be within academic guidelines for getting along with the neighbors, but not naming them leaves readers largely clueless about what he means. A little more bravery would not be out of place.

Oh... and rather than a 'quaint genitive tense,' an accusative case works perfectly well....

War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich?
1 von 1 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
Von Ein Kunde
Format:Gebundene Ausgabe
Professor Dawkins, when may we expect the book that needs to be written on this subject?

Gould seems to envision the conflict between science and religion as some sort of scholarly philosophical discussion between C.S. Lewis and Bertrand Russell. What world is he living in? In ours, we have the likes of Pat Robertson and the Kansas School Board. There are serious, damaging challenges to science from the religious side of the fence, while scientists hardly give religious claims a second glance. The book's not a bad read; and a noble conciliatory gesture, but I think Gould has badly misread the current state of affairs in this country on this issue.

War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich?
Möchten Sie weitere Rezensionen zu diesem Artikel anzeigen?
Waren diese Rezensionen hilfreich?   Wir wollen von Ihnen hören.
Die neuesten Kundenrezensionen
2.0 von 5 Sternen Dr. Gould as ghostwritten by Morris or Gish
Along with a number of the other reviewers, I didn't think this was Dr. Gould's best effort. The first commandment of his proferred 'solution' contradicts his solution. Lesen Sie weiter...
Veröffentlicht am 28. Juli 2000 von Kenneth Hygh
3.0 von 5 Sternen Can Science and Religion be separated?
In this extended essay Mr. Gould offers a solution to the conundrum of competing world views. He proposes a separation of science and theology into two non-overlapping realms of... Lesen Sie weiter...
Veröffentlicht am 20. April 2000 von Gene Greathouse
3.0 von 5 Sternen Nice history lesson, but that's it....
This book is dedicated to the priciple of NOMA(non-overlaping magisteria). The concept of NOMA is intended to give science and religion two seperate realms to address, thus not... Lesen Sie weiter...
Veröffentlicht am 28. Januar 2000 von Peterson
5.0 von 5 Sternen Rocks of Ages: Science and Religion in the Fullness of Life
Dr. Gould reconciles the separate and equally important domains of religion and science using the life, times and perspectives of some of science's great thinkers. Lesen Sie weiter...
Veröffentlicht am 10. Januar 2000 von M. Brooks
1.0 von 5 Sternen Clueless in Cambridge
This learned man has no concept of what religion is about. A self-described agnostic in the "wise sense" (p. Lesen Sie weiter...
Veröffentlicht am 31. Dezember 1999 von Ross Rhodes
2.0 von 5 Sternen Manufactured Categorization
I like most of Gould's work, though it's often hard to read. I loved 'Wonderful Life'. I think his 'punctuated equilibrium' was an attempt to put a catchy label on a minor... Lesen Sie weiter...
Veröffentlicht am 10. Dezember 1999 von john2415
1.0 von 5 Sternen Non-Science
In this book Gould takes another step in mixing science with his wonky social views, in this case arguing for a convergence of religious fundamentalism and evolutionary theory,... Lesen Sie weiter...
Am 5. Dezember 1999 veröffentlicht
4.0 von 5 Sternen Typical Gould, which means it's very good.
If you like Gould, read this. As for the other reviews below this one, get a grip people. Evolution is, as Mayr put it, one long argument about the origin and development of life... Lesen Sie weiter...
Veröffentlicht am 4. November 1999 von Rick Lytel
1.0 von 5 Sternen Gould can't have it both ways
I think that fundamentalists are wrong, but at least they are more consistent than Gould: if evolution is true (in science), then it is also true in ethics and politics. Lesen Sie weiter...
Am 27. September 1999 veröffentlicht
1.0 von 5 Sternen Gould can't have it both ways
I think that fundamentalists are wrong, but at least they are more consistent than Gould: if evolution is true (in science), then it is also true in ethics and politics. Lesen Sie weiter...
Am 27. September 1999 veröffentlicht
Kundenrezensionen suchen
Nur in den Rezensionen zu diesem Produkt suchen

Kunden diskutieren

Das Forum zu diesem Produkt
Diskussion Antworten Jüngster Beitrag
Noch keine Diskussionen

Fragen stellen, Meinungen austauschen, Einblicke gewinnen
Neue Diskussion starten
Thema:
Erster Beitrag:
Eingabe des Log-ins
 


Aktive Diskussionen in ähnlichen Foren
Kundendiskussionen durchsuchen
Alle Amazon-Diskussionen durchsuchen
   
Ähnliche Foren


Lieblingslisten


Ähnliche Artikel finden


Ihr Kommentar


Datenschutzerklärung von Amazon.de Versandbedingungen von Amazon.de Umtausch- & Rücknahme bei Amazon.de