Rocks Of Ages und über 1,5 Millionen weitere Bücher verfügbar für Amazon Kindle. Erfahren Sie mehr

Loggen Sie sich ein, um 1-Click® einzuschalten.
Alle Angebote
Möchten Sie verkaufen? Hier verkaufen
Der Artikel ist in folgender Variante leider nicht verfügbar
Keine Abbildung vorhanden für
Keine Abbildung vorhanden

Beginnen Sie mit dem Lesen von Rocks Of Ages auf Ihrem Kindle in weniger als einer Minute.

Sie haben keinen Kindle? Hier kaufen oder eine gratis Kindle Lese-App herunterladen.

Rocks of Ages: Science and Religion in the Fullness of Life [Englisch] [Taschenbuch]

Stephen Jay Gould
2.7 von 5 Sternen  Alle Rezensionen anzeigen (30 Kundenrezensionen)
Preis: EUR 11,60 kostenlose Lieferung. Siehe Details.
  Alle Preisangaben inkl. MwSt.
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
Nur noch 1 auf Lager (mehr ist unterwegs).
Verkauf und Versand durch Amazon. Geschenkverpackung verfügbar.

Weitere Ausgaben

Amazon-Preis Neu ab Gebraucht ab
Kindle Edition EUR 7,83  
Gebundene Ausgabe --  
Taschenbuch EUR 11,60  
Hörkassette --  


26. Februar 2002
Writing with bracing intelligence and clarity, internationally renowned evolutionist and bestselling author Stephen Jay Gould sheds new light on a dilemma that has plagued thinking people since the Renaissance: the rift between science and religion. Instead of choosing them, Gould asks, why not opt for a golden mean that accords dignity and distinction to each realm?

In his distinctively elegant style, Gould offers a lucid, contemporary principle that allows science and religion to coexist peacefully in a position of respectful noninterference. Science defines the natural world; religion our moral world in recognition of their separate spheres of influence. In exploring this thought-provoking concept, Gould delves into the history of science, sketching affecting portraits of scientists and moral leaders wrestling with matters of faith and reason. Stories of seminal figures such as Galileo, Darwin, and Thomas Henry Huxley make vivid his argument that individuals and cultures must cultivate both a life of the spirit and a life of rational inquiry in order to experience the fullness of being human.

In Rocks of Ages, Gould’s passionate humanism, ethical discernment, and erudition are fused to create a dazzling gem of contemporary cultural philosophy.

Hinweise und Aktionen

  • Studienbücher: Ob neu oder gebraucht, alle wichtigen Bücher für Ihr Studium finden Sie im großen Studium Special. Natürlich portofrei.


  • Taschenbuch: 256 Seiten
  • Verlag: Ballantine Books; Auflage: Reprint (26. Februar 2002)
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • ISBN-10: 034545040X
  • ISBN-13: 978-0345450401
  • Größe und/oder Gewicht: 21,1 x 12,2 x 1,4 cm
  • Durchschnittliche Kundenbewertung: 2.7 von 5 Sternen  Alle Rezensionen anzeigen (30 Kundenrezensionen)
  • Amazon Bestseller-Rang: Nr. 675.618 in Fremdsprachige Bücher (Siehe Top 100 in Fremdsprachige Bücher)
  • Komplettes Inhaltsverzeichnis ansehen

Mehr über den Autor

Entdecken Sie Bücher, lesen Sie über Autoren und mehr


Revered and eminently readable essayist Stephen Jay Gould has once again rendered the complex simple, this time mending the seeming split between the two "Rocks of Ages", science and religion. He quickly, and rightfully, admits that his thesis is not new, but one broadly accepted by many scientists and theologians. Gould begins by suggesting that Darwin has been misconstrued--that while some religious thinkers have used divinity to prove the impossibility of evolution, Darwin would have never done the reverse.

Gould eloquently lays out not "a merely diplomatic solution" to rectify the physical and metaphysical, but "a principled position on moral and intellectual grounds", central to which is the elegant concept of "non-overlapping magisteria". (Gould defines "magisteria" as a "four-bit" word meaning domain of authority in teaching.) Essentially, science and religion can't be unified, but neither should they be in conflict; each has its own discrete magisteria, the natural world belonging exclusively to science and the moral to religion.

Gould's argument is both lucid and convincing as he cites past religious and scientific greats (including a particularly touching section on Darwin himself). Regardless of your persuasions, religious or scientific, Gould holds up his end of the conversation with characteristic respect and intelligence. --Paul Hughes -- Dieser Text bezieht sich auf eine andere Ausgabe: Gebundene Ausgabe .


Gould is at his brilliant best... A truly convincing performance Guardian Convincingly argued and thought provoking-Gould must rank as one of the leading scientific essayists of his generation and, as ever, he is in total command of his subject matter. He steers a deft route through contentious waters, but manages to retain a humorous edge, that keeps the book both engaging and highly entertaining. Gould provides the literary magic to deliver a light-hearted read Irish Times Concise, eloquent and passionate. It is a marvellous work. Gould speaks clear, sound sense, and Rocks of Ages should be required reading not only for scientists and religious people, but for anybody who cares about the quest for meaning Independent This marvellous extended essay should have been the real lost book of the New Testament. Gould, arguably our greatest living popular science essayist, has many joyful enthusiasms. Among them are eternity, Charles Darwin and baseball-Gould has such insatiable and infectious enthusiasm for the intellectual challenge and fascination of being a mere speck in a vast universe Scotsman Rocks of Ages is easy and enjoyable to read. It contains many charming illustrations and interesting insights Sunday Telegraph

In diesem Buch (Mehr dazu)
I WRITE THIS LITTLE BOOK to present a blessedly simple and entirely conventional resolution to an issue so laden with emotion and the burden of history that a clear path usually becomes overgrown by a tangle of contention and confusion. Lesen Sie die erste Seite
Mehr entdecken
Ausgewählte Seiten ansehen
Buchdeckel | Copyright | Inhaltsverzeichnis | Auszug | Stichwortverzeichnis | Rückseite
Hier reinlesen und suchen:


Die hilfreichsten Kundenrezensionen
2 von 2 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
4.0 von 5 Sternen It's Not Science Vs. Religion 6. Juni 1999
Von C. Green
Format:Gebundene Ausgabe
For thinking people there really should be no conflict between science and religion. Science tells you how to build an atom bomb, but it can't even address the question of whether you should use it. Religion, on the other hand, grapples with serious moral questions and offers wisdom about how to live your life. Gould makes clear that only a fundamentalist (i.e Biblical literalist) views Religion and Science like "the Hatfields and the McCoys." (If you think the Bible can do a better job than science of explaining the fossil record, for instance, you won't find much sympathy here.) However, Gould - an agnostic - clearly concedes religion its domain. Reading this book could do a lot of people a lot of good. (Unfortunately, my guess is the ones who could use it most will never pick it up. Some folks aren't much for exposing themselves to contrary points of view.) The book is a good introduction for someone who hasn't really considered the separate realms and dual functions of science and religion. Gould, ordinarily a fabulous essayist, writes much more gracefully in his other volumes in my view. I might have supposed it was ghost written by Joe Friday: just the facts, mam.
War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich?
1 von 1 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
Von M. Brooks
Format:Gebundene Ausgabe
Dr. Gould reconciles the separate and equally important domains of religion and science using the life, times and perspectives of some of science's great thinkers. His message of tolerance and understanding is made from an open, yet skeptical, perspective. His thumbnail biography of Charles Darwin is so touching that it can bring almost anyone to tears. As one who does not yet know enough to know the truth with respect to belief systems, I found much harmony with Gould, Darwin and Thomas Henry Huxley. It is a compact book (222 5" by 8" pages of large type with large margins) and easily read in a day. It is a satisfying read that, by its very nature, leaves you ready for more.
War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich?
1 von 1 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
4.0 von 5 Sternen Typical Gould, which means it's very good. 4. November 1999
Format:Gebundene Ausgabe
If you like Gould, read this. As for the other reviews below this one, get a grip people. Evolution is, as Mayr put it, one long argument about the origin and development of life forms. It has nothing to do with politics, ethics, or any subject. Many use it as a metaphor and then forget that it was used this way; they start to believe it ought to be applied to other fields. Nope. I think this is Gould's main point, and he understands this well.
War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich?
1 von 1 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
5.0 von 5 Sternen Gould provides a clear path for all of us to follow 19. September 1999
Von Ein Kunde
Format:Gebundene Ausgabe
Gould is a master of clear and concise presentation. This most recent effort keeps his record on that score pristine.
As a reviewer writing from Kansas, a state racked by the most recent example of the long history of conflict between science and religion, this book could not be more timely or more on point. Gould deftly defines the line between the magisterium of religion and the magisterium of science and demonstrates that it is a line which is crossed all too often. Gould reminds us all of the absurdity of looking to religion to define the physical world around us. However, he just as effectively warns us of the danger in using science to provide answers to questions of ultimate meaning or morality.
That is not to say that Gould's clarity makes for easy acceptance. Much of what I found most convincing in Gould's presentation was also a source of greatest personal challenge. It seems unavoidable and natural that the "truths" of science will lead people to draw implications that affect personal answers to those ultimate questions about "truth" that are the usual domain of religion or philosophy. Many in our society can easily dismiss the biblical fundamentalist who clings to "Creation Science" as being hopelessly blinded by misplaced religious fervor but Gould's presentation challenges everyone to become aware of the assumptions and "facts" that are often silently inherent in our religious beliefs. Many will bristle, as I did, at Gould's apparent mitigation of the magisterium of religion to simply questions of morality but in the end, I can not disagree with such a characterization and it is not out of alignment with even the most personal of religious belief.
Lesen Sie weiter... ›
War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich?
4.0 von 5 Sternen A fine place to start. 26. September 1999
Von Ein Kunde
Format:Gebundene Ausgabe
Rocks of Ages reads essentially like... Well, any of the recent Stephen Jay Gould books. It consists primarily of material rehashed from his previously published essays, it is built around a simplistic idea, and it provides succinct bulleted lists from which it strays constantly.
On the upside Gould is an extrodinarily eloquent writer, the book is chock full of interesting historical factoids -- and it's short (say, an evening to read).
Gould's theory makes enough sense to me, being an agnostic type who's always loathed philosophers that derive ethical systems on basis of natural law. But I can certainly see a few problems with the theory as a whole.
Gould tells us that empirical and normative studies shouldn't tresspass on each other's turf -- they should just play nice in the sandbox and engage in the occasional discourse for good measure. This is the obvious rational (not to mention pragmatic) conclusion. Unfortunately, rationality is the basis of science, hence science's preferential treatment in Gould's seperate but equal scenario. If science advances into the hinterlands of a topic that had previously been relegated to the world of religion (say, neurobiology and why people sin), religion must curtsey and back away. Religion gets stuck with second fiddle.
Presuppositions arn't a bad thing by any means, but why is a rational-functional model necessarily superior? The query is outside the scope of the book I realize; arguments like that often degrade into "what is reality," etc., but worth thinking about none the less.
Overall, it's certainly worth a few hours of your time to read, a good springboard to move on to (and synthesize with) other areas like education.
War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich?
Möchten Sie weitere Rezensionen zu diesem Artikel anzeigen?
Waren diese Rezensionen hilfreich?   Wir wollen von Ihnen hören.
Die neuesten Kundenrezensionen
2.0 von 5 Sternen Dr. Gould as ghostwritten by Morris or Gish
Along with a number of the other reviewers, I didn't think this was Dr. Gould's best effort. The first commandment of his proferred 'solution' contradicts his solution. Lesen Sie weiter...
Veröffentlicht am 28. Juli 2000 von Kenneth Hygh
3.0 von 5 Sternen Can Science and Religion be separated?
In this extended essay Mr. Gould offers a solution to the conundrum of competing world views. He proposes a separation of science and theology into two non-overlapping realms of... Lesen Sie weiter...
Veröffentlicht am 20. April 2000 von Gene Greathouse
3.0 von 5 Sternen Nice history lesson, but that's it....
This book is dedicated to the priciple of NOMA(non-overlaping magisteria). The concept of NOMA is intended to give science and religion two seperate realms to address, thus not... Lesen Sie weiter...
Veröffentlicht am 28. Januar 2000 von Peterson
1.0 von 5 Sternen Clueless in Cambridge
This learned man has no concept of what religion is about. A self-described agnostic in the "wise sense" (p. Lesen Sie weiter...
Veröffentlicht am 31. Dezember 1999 von Ross Rhodes
1.0 von 5 Sternen "NOMA"n's land
Try as I might, I can find no redeeming features to this book. In the best of all worlds, I can imagine wise and thoughtful spiritualists peacefully coexisting with sensitive... Lesen Sie weiter...
Veröffentlicht am 14. Dezember 1999 von Curtis L. Wilbur
2.0 von 5 Sternen Manufactured Categorization
I like most of Gould's work, though it's often hard to read. I loved 'Wonderful Life'. I think his 'punctuated equilibrium' was an attempt to put a catchy label on a minor... Lesen Sie weiter...
Veröffentlicht am 10. Dezember 1999 von john2415
1.0 von 5 Sternen Non-Science
In this book Gould takes another step in mixing science with his wonky social views, in this case arguing for a convergence of religious fundamentalism and evolutionary theory,... Lesen Sie weiter...
Am 5. Dezember 1999 veröffentlicht
3.0 von 5 Sternen Good, but not good enough
I like Gould. I think he's more right than wrong and definitely side with him in his arguments with Dawkins. But this book is timid. Lesen Sie weiter...
Am 4. November 1999 veröffentlicht
1.0 von 5 Sternen Gould can't have it both ways
I think that fundamentalists are wrong, but at least they are more consistent than Gould: if evolution is true (in science), then it is also true in ethics and politics. Lesen Sie weiter...
Am 27. September 1999 veröffentlicht
1.0 von 5 Sternen Gould can't have it both ways
I think that fundamentalists are wrong, but at least they are more consistent than Gould: if evolution is true (in science), then it is also true in ethics and politics. Lesen Sie weiter...
Am 27. September 1999 veröffentlicht
Kundenrezensionen suchen
Nur in den Rezensionen zu diesem Produkt suchen

Kunden diskutieren

Das Forum zu diesem Produkt
Diskussion Antworten Jüngster Beitrag
Noch keine Diskussionen

Fragen stellen, Meinungen austauschen, Einblicke gewinnen
Neue Diskussion starten
Erster Beitrag:
Eingabe des Log-ins

Kundendiskussionen durchsuchen
Alle Amazon-Diskussionen durchsuchen

Ähnliche Artikel finden

Ihr Kommentar