I work with inner-city boys at church and read this book, knowing I wouldn't agree with all of it, to gain some insight into boy culture. I learned a lot from this book (the "timed-silence" syndrome, how boys play together, how boys show love, much more) but have some major philosophical questions. Most significant: What does it mean to be masculine? It's worse than meaningless to define "masculine" as anything a boy or a man happens to be. (Is bullying masculine behavior? murder? adultery?) We need to value masculinity, but first we need to know what it is. And surely it includes strength, not just emotional openness.
It's helpful to see where boys have been given impossible expectations. It's shameful to see adults expect five-year-olds to be men. Boys shouldn't be expected to be self-sufficient. But surely it's OK to begin to teach nine-year-olds how to develop into men? I don't like the idea of a society with interchangeable genders. Women are more nurturing, men more protective-and that is a good thing. Frankly, a society that tries to train men to be as gentle as women will probably soon find the men irrelevant, because women will still do it more naturally.
It's interesting too how much the author tried to change the way people react toward boys under the guise of trusting one's instincts. First, a woman should not follow the Boy Code with boys (though she's inclined to do so)-she should instead follow her instincts. Strange, the description of how women relate to boys sounded pretty instinctive to me! Odder yet, the author is downright suspicious of men being allowed to follow THEIR instincts in encouraging boys to be tougher. Can you imagine a man not letting his wife teach their daughter to understand others' feelings? Why do we trust a woman's instincts on this more than a man's, if not that this new way of raising boys actually leans toward feminizing them?
Also, where is the role of discipline in expecting boys sometimes to do what's hard for them? Sure, boys have a hard time sitting in their seats, and teachers should know that and allow for creative breaks. But beyond that, boys (and girls) should be taught to do some things that are difficult for them. Cannot learning to sit still for periods of time lead to a harnessing of energy that will help the boy learn self-control? Sometimes a boy (or a girl) IS misbehaving, not responding to some emotion he's feeling. And boys and girls alike need to learn to obey authority even when they don't feel like it. It's the authority figure's responsibility, not the child's, to make the obedience as easy and pleasant as possible.