This book of 18 essays is organized into six sections that undertake the following ambitious tasks: (1) providing some insight into the nature and limits of scientific prediction; (2) assessing the successes, failures, and mixed results of predictions about weather, floods, asteroid/comet impacts, and earthquakes; (3) examining how political considerations can affect predictions about beach erosion, mining impacts, and groundwater movement at a proposed nuclear waste site; (4) considering how various types of uncertainty have affected predictions about oil and gas reserves, the effects of acid rain, and climate change policy; (5) looking at some of the tensions and interactions between science-based predictions and human decision-making that raise or pose complex social and political issues; and (6) offering a synopsis of various lessons learned from the essays in the book.
The book does not provide a simple or casual look at the subject of predictions. The essays are somewhat technical in nature, and are written in a style that assumes the reader has at least some training in, or experience with, science and the scientific method. But, the overall quality of the essays is good and makes it worth the reader's effort to work his or her way through the technical details. Whether or not you agree with the arguments and conclusions about scientific predictions presented by the authors of the various essays, they raise important questions about the nature of predictions, identify significant limits to predictions, make many interesting observations about the use and misuse of predictions in various fields, and point out the need for a thoughtful approach to understanding and applying scientific predictions.
This book is worth reading by scientific professionals interested in the process of making scientific predictions, as well as elected officials, government personnel, and concerned citizens wanting to be better informed about how to understand and evaluate predictions made in connection with public policy issues.