Olympic Portraits. Engl. [Englisch] [Gebundene Ausgabe]

Clearly, Annie Leibovitz is as talented as they come these days for black-and-white portraits of people who are used to posing (like actresses, actors, singers, and models). What happened when she took on athletes as her subject, looking at the preparations by Americans for the Atlanta games in 1996?

The portraits are usually stunning, as might be expected. Many of the action photographs leave something or much to be desired. But that's part of what makes the book interesting. I came away with a new respect for those terrific sports action photographs that I love so much.

As Ms. Leibovitz says, "Each time I worked with an athlete I had two possibilities: . . . concentrate on the person or . . . on the sport." "Sometimes I was able to do both." And those moments when she did both are sublime!

The motion shots are the difficulty. She nicely states the problem. "If you see it, you've missed it." So you have to shoot with an expectation of what is likely to follow, and keep shooting. I suspect that she did not allow enough time to get enough of all the kinds of shots that sports photographers have led us to expect. "The fixed image . . . has to be just the right slice of time, [to] . . . stand for -- and suggest -- the whole movement."

Her talent as a portrait photographer serves her well. The young women and men take on superhuman auras in stunningly composed frames. By focusing on the preparations for the games rather than the games themselves (which are very commercial now), she harkens back to the original Greek ideal of sport as a way to pursue mental and physical perfection.

If I liked the work so much, why did I grade it down one star? As I mentioned earlier, many of the motion shots were either unexciting or below the standard I am used to seeing. In addition, the pages in this book are too small for the images so many photographs have a fold right through critical details. The design is quite weak in that sense.

Here are my favorite images:

Jon Olsen (p. 17)

Amy Van Dyken (p. 19)

Mark Lenzi (p. 21)

Mihai Bagiu (p. 35)

Dominique Moceanu (p. 37)

Dominique Moceanu and John Roethlisberger (p. 39)

Men's Eight (pp. 54-55)

John Godina (p. 66)

Esther Jones, Gwen Torrence, Carlette Guidry (pp. 80-81)

Gwen Torrence (pp. 88-89)

Julie Foudy (pp. 102-103)

Chanda Rubin (pp. 104-105)

Darrick Health (pp. 132-133)

Becky Dyroen-Lancer, Heather Simmons-Carrasco, and Jill Savery (pp. 134-135)

Kevin Burnham and Morgan Reeser (pp. 174-175)

I suggest that you take up Ms. Leibovitz's challenge yourself, by photographing children practicing sports. Your subjects will be delighted with the attention, and they will be easier to shoot because they don't move as fast as adult athletes.

Shoot first, and review the contact sheets later!

This collection of photography at first struck me as being quite gloomy and severe. However, after a closer study of each image I realized that Leibovitz expertly captures so much of the primal emotion of physical exertion. The images range from eerily erotic to firecely competitive-- while also maintaining the dignity of each individual athlete. I'm typically not a big fan of b&w photography but here it really works. The starkness of each image allows the humanness of each athlete to really come through while simultaneously allowing the terror, agony, and glory of the human body in competition to shine.

It is not just the winning or famous athletes that receive attention here - this work is a tribute to the entirety of the athletic spirit, as can be seen from the intense and eloquent images of athletes hard at work, at rest, at play, in victory or in defeat. In fact, some of the photographs are of athletes who are trying to make the Olympics but didn't necessarily succeed - the exertions of these men and women are as much a part of the Olympic spirit as the successful efforts of the few who do make it to the apex. A great pictorial work that truly captures the heart of the Olympic Games.