earlybirdhw2015 Hier klicken mrp_family lagercrantz Cloud Drive Photos UHD TVs Learn More praktisch UrlaubundReise Fire HD 6 Shop Kindle Sparpaket Autorip SummerSale
  • Alle Preisangaben inkl. MwSt.
Nur noch 1 auf Lager (mehr ist unterwegs).
Verkauf und Versand durch Amazon.
Geschenkverpackung verfügbar.
Nietzsche, Psychology, an... ist in Ihrem Einkaufwagen hinzugefügt worden
+ EUR 3,00 Versandkosten
Gebraucht: Sehr gut | Details
Zustand: Gebraucht: Sehr gut
Kommentar: Zust.: Gutes Exemplar. Mit original Schutzumschlag. Jahr:2010
Möchten Sie verkaufen?
Zur Rückseite klappen Zur Vorderseite klappen
Hörprobe Wird gespielt... Angehalten   Sie hören eine Hörprobe des Audible Hörbuch-Downloads.
Mehr erfahren
Alle 2 Bilder anzeigen

Nietzsche, Psychology, and First Philosophy (Englisch) Gebundene Ausgabe – 9. Juli 2010

Alle Formate und Ausgaben anzeigen Andere Formate und Ausgaben ausblenden
Amazon-Preis Neu ab Gebraucht ab
Gebundene Ausgabe
"Bitte wiederholen"
EUR 32,45
EUR 24,73 EUR 26,23
10 neu ab EUR 24,73 6 gebraucht ab EUR 26,23
Jeder kann Kindle Bücher lesen — selbst ohne ein Kindle-Gerät — mit der KOSTENFREIEN Kindle App für Smartphones, Tablets und Computer.


Mehr über den Autor

Entdecken Sie Bücher, lesen Sie über Autoren und mehr



"Pippin presents a much-needed new approach and appreciation of Nietzsche.... [He] adroitly starts fresh with Nietzsche, considering his work holistically and in the context of both early psychology and 19th-century French morality. In his novel reading, Pippin exposes, the folly of underappreciating Nietzsche's irony and self-criticism." (Choice)"

Über den Autor und weitere Mitwirkende

Robert B. Pippin is the Evelyn Stefansson Nef Distinguished Service Professor in the John U. Nef Committee on Social Thought, the Department of Philosophy, and the College at the University of Chicago. He is the author or editor of nearly a dozen books, including, most recently, Hegel's Practical Philosophy: Rational Agency as Ethical Life.


Es gibt noch keine Kundenrezensionen auf Amazon.de
5 Sterne
4 Sterne
3 Sterne
2 Sterne
1 Sterne

Die hilfreichsten Kundenrezensionen auf Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: 3 Rezensionen
6 von 8 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
Intermittently brilliant analysis 21. Oktober 2011
Von Zeno - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format: Gebundene Ausgabe
There are chapters and sections one has to slog through but the journey is worthwhile for the rare gems of interpretive brilliance here and there. For instance, Nietzsche's characterization of 'truth as a woman and philosophers as inexpert lovers'...how wonderfully Pippin unpacks this metaphor. His exposition of Nietzsche's conception of human freedom will put naturalist accounts to shame. Overall a very thought provoking and at times profound analysis that appreciates the full complexity and depth of Nietzsche's philosophical and literary genius.
12 von 20 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
Pippin, Nietzsche, Psychology & First Philosophy 14. November 2011
Von D. C. Riechel - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format: Gebundene Ausgabe Verifizierter Kauf
This book will likely appeal far more to the professor's hermeneutic circle of colleagues than to readers with an interest in the subject and some knowledge of it but who dwell outside the guild. The book is an expanded version of lectures Pippin delivered in France, and shows every sign of its perhaps too hasty re-working. The text is repeatedly interrupted by paragraph-length footnotes, some taking up half the page--afterthoughts and additions that often project the argument into different directions or more often add relevant material or quotations that could just as well and with less fuss have been embodied in the text--but that takes more careful rewriting. Some footnotes are little more than salutes to like-minded friends. But in one footnote he refers to Sarah Kofman's study of Nietzsche and metaphor, with the remark: "As will be very clear, I disagree with almost every aspect of her interpretation..." And that is the only reference Pippin makes to Kofman. It would have been useful as well as hospitable even to a reader familiar with Kofman's work to have then identified points of disagreement in the following relevant sections. Pippin's bibliography lists Kofman's book only in the original French; again it would have been both courteous and useful to the outsider to know that her study is also available in a 1993 English translation (by Duncan Large, and published by Stanford U. Press). The number of Nietzsche studies since the 1970s is enormous; no one can read all of therm, but it is remarkable that Pippin totally ignores an important study from 1985 which in many ways is relevant to his own argument: Alexander Nehamas, Nietzsche: Life as Literature (Harvard U. Press). Besides the major aspect of the literariness of Nietzsche's texts, Nehamas also writes on Nietzsche's psychology; the themes of doer/deed; self-deception; the unity of the self; self-overcoming (becoming who one is)--and he offers the inestimable advantage of a clarity of style and a grace of discourse that illuminate far more and much more than Pippin's brusk, self-interrupting and swaggering manner can possibly achieve.
23 von 40 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
Stimulating Asides 6. August 2010
Von Ralph Samuels - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format: Gebundene Ausgabe Verifizierter Kauf
In Nietzsche, Psychology, & First Philosophy, Robert B. Pippin gives us a picture of Nietzsche as a French rather than a German thinker, framing him less as a philosopher in any conceptual sense than an essayist, a moralist, and a prophet.

In so far as Nietzsche's scattered, shrill, deliberately "bobby-trapped" and often contradictory aphorisms have a central thrust or orientation, Pippin characterizes it as follows:

"How, [Nietzsche] wants to know above all, did Montaigne manage to exhibit such a thoroughgoing skepticism and clarity about human frailties and failings without Pascal's despair and eventual surrender or La Rochefoucauld's icy contempt for the `human all too human'?"

That's an interesting question in itself, though it also offers a new perspective from which to examine Nietzsche's work. Pippin suggests that Nietzsche arrived at the conclusion that there is no theory underlying the way the world matters to Montaigne. That may explain why there is no coherent theory to be found in Nietzsche's work, either. But Pippin wants to go as far as he can toward clarifying the position Nietzsche eventually did take regarding not only the issue of Montaigne's healthy skepticism--an issue that might almost be considered one more of temperament than theory--but also the broader issue for which Nietzsche is perhaps best known, of the trans-valuation of values.

On the face of things, we might question whether these two endeavors will really be taking us in the same direction. For not only can it be said that Montaigne had no theory, he also luxuriated in the differing and contradictory approaches to life that others exhibited. Perhaps his watchword might be found in the remark, "All other knowledge is harmful to him who has not the knowledge of goodness." (On Pedantry) This approach to "philosophy" differs radically from Nietzsche's, which often carries a cantankerous, hectoring, admonitory tone. At one point Montaigne writes:

"It is a mistake to describe [philosophy] as inaccessible to children and of a lowering and frowning and terrifying aspect. Who has disguised her with this wan and hideous mask? There is nothing gayer, more jocund, more blithe, and I might almost say, sportive. She exhorts always to holidaying and merry-making; a sad and spiritless air shows that not there is her abode." (On the Education of Children)

Pippin's finds the "key" to Nietzsche's work in his desire to assume the sportive attitude toward philosophy that Montaigne describes here and also assumes himself, and he suggests that Nietzsche arrives at a mature exposition of that position in The Gay Science.

Even this brief description may suggest that the challenge Pippin has set for himself is considerable. And although he structures his argument methodically, his prose is far from scintillating. And as we soldier on through the early chapters, there are many points at which we feel things are being made a little more complicated than they need to be, and other places at which Pippin seems to lose the point entirely.

Let me give you an example. At one point, early on in the book, Pippin takes up the issue of commitment as a grounding force in the search for meaning. Where do commitments come from?

"No one faces a world of neutral objects and possibilities and `decides' with what sort of importance to invest some any more than one faces an array of persons and decides whom to invest with love."

What Pippin is trying to say, I guess, is that things (and people) have valences that attract or repel us--they aren't neutral. Nevertheless, we do make decisions about which things appeal to us and which don't, based on our personal experience as well as our predilections; at the highest (or deepest) level, the things we value--things like friendship, loyalty, honor, kindness--aren't things at all in any material sense.

Pippin goes on to differentiate between "deep" commitments and "thin" commitments, and in several places uses the word "commitment" and "erotic attachment" interchangeably. Here again he seems to be muddling the issue. A commitment is not the same thing as an attachment, erotic or otherwise. A child may be attached to his or her poodle, for example, but not fully committed to caring for it. A soldier may be committed to carrying out an order, out of a sense of duty, without being in any way attached to it.

The presence of the word "erotic" is also troubling. We are being asked to draw upon a long history of associations extending back to Plato, though in his efforts to elevate "erotic attachment" above mere "felt desire" Pippin offers a circular definition that includes the thing defined: "[Erotic attachment] involves a wholehearted, passionate commitment to and identification with a desired end."

Wrong again. Things are going from bad to worse here, and the phrase "desired end" threatens to pitch Pippin's analysis off the rails entirely. Why? Because a commitment--and especially a deep one--is less often to an end than to a way. I might be committed to completing a crossword puzzle, but such a commitment isn't terribly deep. A commitment to eating free-range chicken, on the other hand, or to reading the Times faithfully, gives slightly greater weight to the concept. But such commitments are open-ended. They lack a desired end, as do more serious commitments, such as to deal honestly with others, remain faithful to one's spouse, obey the law, or tithe.

Pippin's argument, here and elsewhere, would have benefited immensely from a few examples.
Yet we follow the imprecise and sometimes muddled reasoning, stimulated by the counter-thoughts they generate and hopeful that he'll turn the corner when he finally begins to discuss the specifics Nietzsche puts forth in The Gay Science. Montaigne is nowhere in sight by this point, but according to Pippin, the problem that Nietzsche himself is addressing (and here is where the "erotic attachment" comes into play) is, to put it in the simplest and least philosophical terms possible, that as the nineteenth century draws to a close, Western civilization is losing its mojo.

In chapter three Pippin takes up the most famous (but still not well understood) tenet in Neitzsche's corpus--the death of God. The passage in question is more complex, not to say ambivalent, than a simple pronouncement that God is dead, and Pippin's analysis here is both nuanced and sound. In the end, it brings him around again to the issue of commitment.

"...we have been investigating how Nietzsche understands the psychological conditions of value, the possibility of an action-guiding depth commitment. He treats the current context as hostile to this possibility both because of the death of God and even more because of how that news has been understood."

Nietzsche felt that his contemporaries were no longer capable of sacrifice or commitment, and found their reaction to such a condition no less distressing--either a melancholic and theatrical guilt or a self-satisfied pose of enlightened free-thinking.

But it's important to note (Pippin devotes a good deal of time to the issue) that Nietzsche describes this cultural malaise as historically conditioned. As Pippin puts it: "The psyche amounts to a historically achieved and quite variable way of holding ourselves and others to account." Yet this view doesn't square very well with Pippin's own rhetoric, in which he often uses the pronoun "we," as if the situation he and his readers face in the twenty-first century were identical to the one Nietzsche and his late-nineteenth-century European contemporaries found themselves in. Can it really be said that Tea Party advocates, Al-Qaeda operatives, North Korean generals or Japanese auto workers lack commitment? In the end, Pippin is in danger of undermining the relevance of his entire project when he writes: "This image of the passionless, bored bourgeois has by now become a rather banal cliché." Not only banal, but inaccurate.

In the end, what saves the book are the footnotes and asides, which draw our attention to various minor points explored by Nietzsche, Montaigne, Pascal and other thinkers. Certainly there is food for thought on every page, though we may leave the book with the impression that Montaigne is, indeed, a vital and engaging writer ... while Nietzsche remains an aphorist for disgruntled adolescents who have not yet come to grips with the wider, deeper streams of modern thought and history.
Waren diese Rezensionen hilfreich? Wir wollen von Ihnen hören.