This book describes the way newspaper journalism ought to be, as seen from the eyes of an excellent newspaper journalist. It's also a glimpse of the way things were just a few decades ago, when newspaper journalism was still a vital part of life in the town and cities of the United States. Hamill is an eloquent and emotional voice for better newspaper journalism. He is also, sadly, a voice from the past, for the past.
The core content of the book is a set of well-thought out solutions, recommendations intended to pull the papers back out of the swamp. Hamill is remarkably optimistic, in fact, about what might solve the problems he so convincingly describes.
My main question, after reading the book and watching the general decline it describes, is whether Hamill's solutions are realistic. He blames publishers for the dumbing of the American newspaper, not the readers, and that worries me. If newspapers achieved the Hamill ideal, would they win readers?