More Bad News from Israel [Englisch] [Taschenbuch]

This excellent book is an expanded and updated edition of Bad news from Israel, published in 2004. The authors ask that the media give an accurate account of the perspectives of both sides to the conflict.

Presently, both BBC and ITV tend to present the Israeli version of events as fact, while the Palestinians have only `claims' or `beliefs'. The Israelis are swift to supply the media with clear consistent accounts. They blame the Palestinians for starting the conflict and assert that Israel merely `responds' to Palestinian violence, so any casualties are really the Palestinians' own fault. By contrast, the media never give a clear account of the Palestinian case.

The authors analyse how the TV news bulletins described the conflict's causes, the casualties and the motives of the contending parties. They found that the bulletins gave little background to the conflict's causes. So even in 2009, two-thirds of the sample of British social science students still did not know who was occupying the occupied territories. The authors also study how people received the news.

The new sections of the book take the history of the conflict on from the first edition: Hamas wins the Palestinian elections, the 2006 Lebanon war, Hamas takes control of Gaza, the Israel-Hamas ceasefire, the 2008-09 Gaza war, the Goldstone report, the second Netanyahu administration and Israel's 2010 attack on the Gaza aid flotilla. There are also new chapters on the news content and competing explanations of the Gaza war, the audience understanding of the conflict and the Gaza attack, and the attack on the Gaza flotilla.

The UN report on the Gaza war, the Goldstone report, accused Hamas of war crimes: "where there is no intended target and the rockets and mortars are launched into civilian areas, they constitute a deliberate attack against the civilian population'. But the UN found that Israel had committed by far the most breaches of international law. The report concluded that Israel had carried out "a deliberately disproportionate attack designed to punish, humiliate and terrorize a civilian population, radically diminish its local economic capacity both to work and to provide for itself, and to force upon it an ever increasing sense of dependency and vulnerability."

The United States Congress passed a resolution condemning the UN report. The resolution, wrongly, stated that the "report makes no mention of the relentless rocket and mortar attacks" by Palestinian groups.

The Israeli attack on the Gaza aid flotilla killed nine passengers and wounded 54. The UN report into the attack stated that the Israeli blockade of Gaza was `unlawful' and that the Israeli action of intercepting the aid ship Mavi Marmara was `clearly unlawful'.

After securing the top deck, Israeli soldiers fired at the passengers below on the bridge deck. The report found that "none of the four passengers who were killed, including a photographer, who at the time of being shot was engaged in taking photographs and was shot by an Israeli soldier positioned on the top deck above, posed any threat to the Israeli forces."

The UN report found that the Israeli forces had used torture and that at least six of the passengers had been subjected to `extra-legal, arbitrary and summary executions'. The report concluded that Israeli forces had used a level of force that was `disproportionate to the occasion' using `totally unnecessary and incredible violence' which `betrayed an unacceptable level of brutality'. The BBC lunchtime, early evening and main news never mentioned the report.

Like all the Glasgow University Media Group's work, this is fine, useful scholarship which makes an invaluable contribution to our understanding of the conflict.