In my review of The Haunted Smile: The Story of Jewish Comedians in America, I share Epstein's concluding observations that "the comics who emerged from this Jewish background were not aware of psychological or sociological theories. As George Burns noted, they were not hungry for recognition; they were hungry for food. They did not question their humor but rather just recognized and used it. Nevertheless, the roles comedians played and most particularly the contributions of Eastern European Jewish culture shaped the personalities of these comedians and lay, either hidden or not, in their minds." I then explain that, for me, a Gentile, it is impossible to determine to what extent Jewish comedy became assimilated within American society, and, to what extent Jewish comedy helped American society became assimilated with Jewish values. My suggestion then and now is that we call it a tie and consider ourselves that much the better for it.
In this volume, Epstein focuses his attention on "America's love affair with comedy teams from Burns and Allen to Belushi and Aykroyd" as he explains how and why the greatest comedy teams became so popular in films, on radio, and then on television. Sharing much in common with marriages, not all comedy teams survived (e.g. Martin and Lewis) whereas many of those which did succeeded despite significant differences between the partners. Epstein suggests that these differences help to explain the appeal of Laurel and Hardy, the Marx Brothers, Abbott and Costello, the Three Stooges, and Hope and Crosby. I especially appreciate Epstein's insights concerning George Burns and Gracie Allen. Early on, Burns realized that -- contrary to his prior background and training -- audiences required him to be her straight man, feeding her carefully crafted cues. Indeed, most of the great comedy teams demonstrate this symbiotic relationship between "an authority figure" and a "rebellious spirit." The former was not necessarily one of the team's partners. For Laurel and Hardy, Jimmy Finlayson served that purpose as did Margaret Dumont for the Marx Brothers (especially for Groucho) and Audrey Meadows (Alice) for Jackie Gleason (Ralph) and Art Carney (Ed). True, over time, traditional comedy teams seem to have lost much of their appeal, as have stand-up comics. However, as Epstein notes, there was "the uncharted course of their enduring afterlife, reflected in such forms as contemporary situation comedies" which include M*A*S*H, the Mary Tyler Moore Show, Cheers, Friends, and Frasier.
For Epstein, the essence of a team is suggested by the following exchange between the Crane brothers:
Frasier: Dinner?
Niles: Perfect. No place fancy, I'm sure neither of us wants a heavy meal with lots of wine and expensive desserts.
Frasier: Oh, it's your turn to pay, isn't it?
Niles: You know me so well.
All of the great comedy teams knew each other so well. As Epstein explains, "It is a feeling all of us need, and that is why we will continue to treasure the enduring contributions of comedy teams. They, after all, created characters that reflected our private dreams, suppressed longings, and most bedeviling fears. And, most importantly, as we remember their routines and their friendships, we find ourselves laughing."
This is a brilliant and eloquent as well as highly entertaining book which enables its reader to increase substantially her or his understanding and appreciation of the great comedy teams. As I read the final chapter, I felt like Charles Chipping ("Mr. Chips") who, in his imagination, is re-visited by all the boys whom he had taught throughout his career at Brookfield. Thanks to Lawrence Epstein, I have been able to reconnect with so many beloved entertainers whose talents enriched my life in ways and to an extent I am unable to express now.