Ms. Warren has used nearly every over-used plot device in the romance genre for this book: The "misunderstanding", the "woman who thinks she's barren because her husband had kids before", the "troubled hero because of a loss in his past", the "barter of body to repay debt", the "very evil villain who did horrible things to another person to hurt the hero", the "break up to spare feelings which actually hurts things more", the "TSTL heroine who assumes that there's no reason for the restrictions her husband gives", the "heroine who is sexually innocent because her previous husband wasn't good in bed and called her frigid". I could go on and on, really.
Why 3 stars then? Well, if you've seen some of the awful books I've read recently, you'd understand why I would feel guilty giving it the same rating as some of those whoppers. I will say that I personally think it deserves about a 2 1/2, but a three is more accurate.
As is my typical style, I choose not to rehash the plot. It's always covered numerous times by other reviewers and sources.
As is also my style, I have to quote something from the book that stands out to me. Mainly that, while I don't mind having a character give birth in a book, there are times when LESS description is better.
"He felt her entire body shake as she forced the baby from her body in a slick rush of agony."
Well then. That doesn't sound pleasant! Look, I've got 2 kids. I birthed them both naturally, sans any meds. I understand the process of childbirth. But we really could have done without some of the descriptive text.
The sex scenes were average. Not overly hot, but didn't include any horrifying descriptions of oddly-colored genitalia or crying vulvas. The characters appeared to have a genuine affection for eachother, although that was more stated than made self-evident. The relationship between St. George and Maris was, as much of the other plot devices in the book, a bit over-used, but not horribly so. The whole "secret past" with Pamela is something I think I've read in 5 different books in the last year alone, but I can accept it, I suppose.
I wouldn't go out of my way to recommend this book or author to anyone (I think I've read 2 others of her books, so clearly I don't dislike her in general), but I wouldn't try to dissuade someone from reading it. It's just important that you go into it knowing that you'll see a lot of repetition, and no fresh/new ideas.
Also, since this is something that drives me crazy with other books, and contributed to this receiving 3 stars instead of 2, the editing was fairly well done. That's always nice to see!