Elfriede Jelenik's Lust is a bleak, relentlessly dark novel- an explicit description of a woman's repeated sexual abuse by her husband, a rapacious businessman who regards his wife as a worn-out vessel for his bodily fluids. Home life is affluent but empty - their son is an overweening, irritating little brat (taking after his father). Later on, Gerti begins an affair with another man, whose contemptuous treatment of her simply echoes the sordid treatment of her husband. Finally, she takes her revenge on her husband- the only way she knows how.
This novel has a couple of stylistic oddities. Firstly, there are no characters in this novel. Rather, the work is populated by one-dimensional stooges. The wife, Gerti, is a speechless, passive vessel of exploitation, her husband a senseless brute driven by his bodily urges. If we gave Jelenik the benefit of the doubt, we may call them allegorical- although personally I find them shallow and didactic.
Secondly, there is no direct speech. This gives the book an oppressive atmosphere, which excludes the reader from any attempt to form his own opinion about the characters, as they are effectively dehumanised- robbed of their only means of articulation (and so Gerti's passive status is only further exacerbated). The effect is rather ruthless and authoritarian, as though Jelenik is forcing her own particular world view down the reader's throat, stripping the work of any potentially fruitful ambiguity. Further, there is a complete lack of humour in this novel. This is not a trivial criticism- Jelenik peppers her text with dark, witty asides here and there, but, despite being clever and well-written, they come across as simply bitter, empty cynicism.
When this book isn't recounting poor Gerti being poked and prodded in all sorts of demeaning ways, the author subjects the reader to a kind of vulgar-Marxist diatribe. Gerti's abuse, and her environmentally despoiled Alpine community are a microcosm of a bleak, empty world of alienation. However, it's all too relentless for my liking- the novel's insistent tone, what comes across as a kind of dreary feminist-Marxist tract, brow-beats the reader into submission. Its world view is too narrow, it lacks the breadth and richness of experience we expect from literature. One can't help but feel doubly disappointed in reading this book- firstly at the novel itself, but more profoundly, at the kind of mindset which could produce such a resigned, desolate world-view.