A Line in the Sand: Britain, France and the struggle that... und über 1,5 Millionen weitere Bücher verfügbar für Amazon Kindle. Erfahren Sie mehr
Ihren Artikel jetzt
eintauschen und
EUR 3,50 Gutschein erhalten.
Möchten Sie verkaufen?
Zur Rückseite klappen Zur Vorderseite klappen
Anhören Wird wiedergegeben... Angehalten   Sie hören eine Probe der Audible-Audioausgabe.
Weitere Informationen
Dieses Bild anzeigen

A Line in the Sand: Britain, France and the Struggle for the Mastery of the Middle East (Englisch) Gebundene Ausgabe – 4. August 2011

2 Kundenrezensionen

Alle 3 Formate und Ausgaben anzeigen Andere Formate und Ausgaben ausblenden
Amazon-Preis Neu ab Gebraucht ab
Kindle Edition
"Bitte wiederholen"
Gebundene Ausgabe
"Bitte wiederholen"
EUR 154,70 EUR 43,68
3 neu ab EUR 154,70 4 gebraucht ab EUR 43,68 1 Sammlerstück ab EUR 54,50

Hinweise und Aktionen

  • Große Hörbuch-Sommeraktion: Entdecken Sie unsere bunte Auswahl an reduzierten Hörbüchern für den Sommer. Hier klicken.

Jeder kann Kindle Bücher lesen — selbst ohne ein Kindle-Gerät — mit der KOSTENFREIEN Kindle App für Smartphones, Tablets und Computer.


  • Gebundene Ausgabe: 454 Seiten
  • Verlag: Simon & Schuster UK (4. August 2011)
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • ISBN-10: 1847374530
  • ISBN-13: 978-1847374530
  • Größe und/oder Gewicht: 15,3 x 3,6 x 23,4 cm
  • Durchschnittliche Kundenbewertung: 5.0 von 5 Sternen  Alle Rezensionen anzeigen (2 Kundenrezensionen)
  • Amazon Bestseller-Rang: Nr. 365.689 in Fremdsprachige Bücher (Siehe Top 100 in Fremdsprachige Bücher)

Mehr über den Autor

Entdecken Sie Bücher, lesen Sie über Autoren und mehr


Über den Autor und weitere Mitwirkende

James Barr has worked for the Daily Telegraph, in politics, and in the City, and has travelled widely in the Middle East. He is the author of Setting the Desert on Fire, a history of T.E. Lawrence and the secret war in Arabia. During the research for A Line in the Sand he was a visiting fellow at St Antony's College, Oxford.

Welche anderen Artikel kaufen Kunden, nachdem sie diesen Artikel angesehen haben?


5.0 von 5 Sternen
5 Sterne
4 Sterne
3 Sterne
2 Sterne
1 Sterne
Beide Kundenrezensionen anzeigen
Sagen Sie Ihre Meinung zu diesem Artikel

Die hilfreichsten Kundenrezensionen

2 von 2 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich Von M. Schweiger am 19. September 2012
Format: Taschenbuch Verifizierter Kauf
James Barr picks the story of ,A Line in the Sand` up where he left it in ,Setting the Desert on Fire` - the infamous Sykes-(George-)Picot-Agreement providing the basis for the disasters that were to ensue from it. Commercial (Turkish Petroleum Company, bifurcated pipeline to Haifa and Syria) and imperial/colonial considerations drove the British (Mesopotamia and Palestine) and the French (Lebanon and Syria) to conclude (short-lived) alliances with each other (Churchill and de Gaulle) only to stab each other in the back as soon as an opportunity permitted it (the French supporting the Jewish resistance against British occupation with arms, shelter and information, the British supporting Lebanese and Syrian movements to drive the French out of the Levant).

The struggle in the Middle East between the British and the French had no winners - both were to leave as their `empires' fell apart.

Great book.
Kommentar War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich? Ja Nein Feedback senden...
Vielen Dank für Ihr Feedback. Wenn diese Rezension unangemessen ist, informieren Sie uns bitte darüber.
Wir konnten Ihre Stimmabgabe leider nicht speichern. Bitte erneut versuchen
Format: Taschenbuch Verifizierter Kauf
Ein exzellenter Überblick über die Enstehung der heutigen staatlichen Ordnund des Nahen Ostens nach dem Ersten Weltkrieg. Man lernt viel über die Arroganz von Großmächten (Großbritannien und Frankreich), die es als Selbstverständlichkeit betrachten, ganze Weltregionen für sich auszubeuten, wenn sich denn die Gelegenheit bietet. Man erfährt auch viel über Unterschiede im Stil und die Gedankenlosigkeit, aber auch Ahnungslosigkeit, mit der Politik gemacht wurde.
Kommentar War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich? Ja Nein Feedback senden...
Vielen Dank für Ihr Feedback. Wenn diese Rezension unangemessen ist, informieren Sie uns bitte darüber.
Wir konnten Ihre Stimmabgabe leider nicht speichern. Bitte erneut versuchen

Die hilfreichsten Kundenrezensionen auf Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: 12 Rezensionen
3 von 3 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
thoroughly entertaining review of one of the most tempestuous periods in modern history 27. April 2014
Von Adam Royale - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format: Kindle Edition Verifizierter Kauf
James Barr's enthralling tale is well told and even better researched as it takes us through the tortuous roads of colonial intrigue that finally releases the forces and tensions of the modern Middle East. The book depicts both Britain and France as the midwives of the state of Israel whose rivalries also gives birth to the grotesque and grissly monsters that has become today's Syria, Iraq and of course Palestine. Highly recommended to anyone who would like to understand the political and social dilemmas facing middle eastern politicians and populace would try to work for a lasting peace in the Region. If ever there is an expose of the thoroughly discredited policies of colonial conquest and rule, this book demonstrates it in an understated and thoroughly human way. Highly recommended
2 von 2 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
This well-written and researched book has been spoiled by a ... 20. Februar 2015
Von Richard Lightbown - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format: Taschenbuch
This well-written and researched book has been spoiled by a plethora of petty errors and omissions. This limits its use as an academic source. I did not record all the inaccuracies that I noticed, but the following come to mind:
1) Britain did no ‘seize’ Cyprus in 1878 (p9): it was leased to the British Empire following the Congress of Berlin.
2) Neither did Britain ‘seize’ the Suez Canal (p9): it took out a loan from Rothschild to buy the Egyptian Government’s stock.
3) In his account of the Fashoda Incident of 1898 Barr omits any reference to the Anglo-Egyptian victory under Kitchener at Omdurman earlier in that year when nearly 10,000 Sudanese were killed for the loss of 28 British and 20 Egyptians. It was hardly surprising therefore that the French force of 12 French officers and 150 Senegalese soldiers was ordered to withdraw after Kitchener arrived at Fashoda with 2,500 Sudanese soldiers and five gunboats with Maxim guns and field-guns.
4) The suggestion that Ronald Storrs was responsible for instigating the Hussein-McMahon correspondence (p23) is implausible, although the egotistical Storrs may have claimed this to have been so. Hussein’s son Abdullah had contacted Kitchener in February 1914 when the latter was British Agent and Consul-General in Egypt. Although Kitchener was non-committal, contacts had been maintained. Storrs, who was not fully fluent in Arabic, was more likely to have been responsible for the gaffs in the correspondence, such as the suggestion that Lebanese Christians were not Arabs.
5) Herbert Samuel is similarly credited for the work of others on p32. Samuel was certainly an ardent Zionist, but the real hard graft and intrigue to secure the Balfour Declaration was led by Chaim Weizmann, backed by Walter Rothschild.
6) Barr mentions on p51 that Allenby’s predecessor had twice failed to capture Gaza. In fact the town had been captured during the first Battle of Gaza but Dobell had feared a counter attack and had ordered a withdrawal. The exhausted troops were unable to recapture the town the following day. Barr does not mention that gas and tanks were used during the Second Battle although both were rendered ineffective by the heat and, in the case of the tanks, the sandy conditions. The town was razed by shelling from Australian artillery and the French Navy during the third battle.
7) The account of the riot at Haifa oil refinery is misleading. The Irgun had thrown grenades into a crowd of Arab workers killing six and wounding forty-two. This provoked the attack on Jewish workers in the refinery, for which Ilan Pappé gives different casualty figures (39 killed and 49 wounded). The Jewish Agency publically condemned the Irgun atrocity but secretly authorised the Hagannah to carry out retaliation. This took the form of raids on the villages of Balad al-Shaykh and Hawsha where houses were blown and set on fire and according to Zachary Lockman some 60 were killed, included women and children.
8) The death toll at Deir Yassin (p365) is generally reckoned to be much less than 250, even by scholars critical of the Zionist actions. Barr ought to have mentioned that the village had an agreement with the Hagannah that it would not allow Arab fighters to stay there and in return the Zionists had promised not to attack it. In consequence Haganah forces had not intended to take part in the attack. However Stern Gang and Irgun members had been unable to overcome resistance in the headman’s house (they were more familiar with caching bombs and ambushing soldiers and unarmed civilians) so a nearby Palmach unit was briefly called in to suppress the resistance.
9) The victims of the reprisal massacre on Mt Scopus in Jerusalem (p366) were not all non-combatants (Barr describes them as ‘doctors, nurses and students’). The dead included two members of the Irgun injured at Deir Yassin, and members of the armed escort from the Hagannah.
10) The Altalena which Barr describes on p364 as a 'landing craft' was actually a landing ship, tank (LST) of 4,800 tons.

The problem of this sloppy writing is that when Barr gets into original material from his own researches one is unable to to accept it at face value but is also unable to verify it from other sources. This considerably detracts from the value of the work as a source of reference.
1 von 1 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
Great Book to Know the Present 26. Mai 2015
Von Ihab - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format: Taschenbuch
I am half way through the book. I am telling this book clear any ambiguity about what was happening in the middle east after the collapse of the Ottoman empire. And also it allowed me to rethink of what is going on currently in the middle east. One important chapter, if you will, summarize the whole conflict "The Pipelines"
3 von 4 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
Colonial Rivalry 22. September 2012
Von kadiya - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format: Kindle Edition Verifizierter Kauf
Barr reveals just how caustic the jealousies of the colonial rivals, France and Britain, were in the first part of the 20th century. It is fascinating to observe how the petty conceits of a national leader can affect the history of nations. I was surprised at how far the British went to appease de Gaulle, while they were actually supposed to be allies. The book was entertaining in the way it recorded surreptious methods in which the actual characters on the ground in Syria and Palestine circumvented the constraints of Whitehall to do what was best in Britain's interest. Intriguing!
The Bad and the Ugly without much Good. 29. Januar 2015
Von ahertzba - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format: Kindle Edition Verifizierter Kauf
A look at the an unfortunate period in the history of the Middle East with all the warts of self-interest and short sightedness -- the destructiveness of looking in the mirror and not out the window. There are few heroes, though I'm sure that each of the adversaries have a different and self-justifying story to tell. Alas, the spinning does nothing to alleviate the results attained. Despite the "where you sit determines where you stand" truism, bad policies come home to roost, as in "what comes around goes around." This book is an excellent integration of complex, multi-faceted events and a sad read.
Waren diese Rezensionen hilfreich? Wir wollen von Ihnen hören.

Ähnliche Artikel finden