I had high hopes for this book, and what I think it's trying to do is admirable, ranging and probing. I had wanted to use a chapter from it for a college course. But upon close reading, I became more and more disappointed with the writing, and convinced that I couldn't put this in front of students. There are key ideas - exciting insights into Schwitters' total program, and difficulty of elucidating his particular mysticism - woven together in prose that's alternately clear and convoluted. It's not simply that it's "scholarly" - that doesn't put me off - but that it sets out to elucidate a difficult subject, one that needs attention, and still doesn't seem quite clear to itself. Maybe this impression is encouraged by the many editing mistakes in this book - it cries out for a copy editor ( - words are missing, phrases transposed, spelling, etc.). Again, I admire the effort - can we send it back for a re-write? I really want this book to succeed.