I really did want to enjoy this book, but I didn't. It had all the flaws of Tam Lin, but less plot and humor. Oh, and yes, it was boring.
Yes, I found this book to be lacking in humor. An occasional wry remark or giggle from one of Gentian's friends does not a good book make. I do not mean that I expected some kind of comedy, but all the characters take themselves too seriously. And, of course, they're all one-dimensional. Gentian seems to dislike her sister Juniper immensely, but has no qualms about regularly sneaking and reading her diary. Who is in the wrong there? Also, doesn't anyone notice that Dominic can't seem to speak but in quotes? Sure, a certain amount of quoting is all well and good, but when a person just can't seem to speak any other way, don't you begin to wonder if he is some kind of freak? Gentian also somehow is convinced that he is somehow obsessed by her, but every time he meets one of her friends, he spends most of the time checking that friend out. I did not find Gentian to be a particularly strong, self-reliant heroine. She's as superficial as any of the other people she loves to sneer at. There's a lot of throwaway stuff too-- just what is the point of Dominic being touchy about Alma's race? And that Ouija board episode? That kind of thing did nothing for the characterization or the plot, though I guess it did its job of adding pages to the book. Grrr.
Dean is more than a little inconsistent with her quoting. If she expects her readers to have a good deal of familiarity with various writers and poets such as Heinlein Pope and Keats, then why does she basically recap the entire plot of two of Shakespeare's plays-- Julius Caesar and Twelfth Night? It's as if she wanted to give us her own opinion about various characters such as Anthony and Malvolio without actually writing an essay about them. What was the point? Please, tell me.