There are, at present, two complete versions of the long Chinese comic novel "Journey to the West". One of them, the more recent, is published by Anthony Yu at Chicago University Press. The other, an older version made by W. J. F. Brenner for the Foreign Language Press, is made over five decades ago, but is as yet still not completely superseded.
Looking through the translations, it's obvious that both are worthy undertakings by two enthusiatic contemporary Sinologists. Anthony Yu, though not a native English speaker, is professor of East Asian studies at the Chicago University, an expert in his field, and an ethnic Chinese. Brenner is a long-time Sino translator who has rendered his fair share of Chinese classics into English. So how did these two translations fare compared with each other?
Brenner is a no-nonsensical and very sensible translator of the Wu Cheng'en's book. While he doesn't take great liberties with the text, when required, he demonstrates lots of felicities in reframing Chinese ideas and philosophies into English. Take the beginning for instance, a difficult passage which involves understanding of Chinese arithmetics and metaphysics. Here is Brenner's version:
"In the arithmetic of the universe, 129,600 years make one cycle. Each cycle can be divided into twelve phases: I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII. VIII, IX, X, XI and XII, the twelve branches. Each phase lasts 10,800 years.
"Now within a single day, the positive begins at the time I; at II the cock crows; at III it is not quite light; at IV the sun rises; V is after breakfast; and at VI one does business. VII is when the sun reaches noon; at VIII it is slipping towards the west; IX is late afternoon; the sun sets at X; XI is dusk; and at XII people settle down for the night."
This is elegant as is readable and comprehensible to an English audience. Although Brenner forgoes the nitty-gritties of exact transliteration, he did not excise anything of note, and got the gist of the passage right. One could imagine this is how the author would have composed in English.
Brenner's translation is consistently fine and accurate. His language is on the whole simple and easily understood as long you have a high school degree. Where Brenner is more limited, as compared to Arthur Waley's classic abridged "Monkey", is in recreating the full range of tones and satiric emotions of the original. "Journey to the West" is a satirical, high-spirited adventure story; Brenner is idiomatic and readable, but he can occasionally sacrifice some of the original's comic mischievousness. Here Waley is incomparable; though he may sound a little arch, one has no doubt Waley is at one with Wu Cheng'en's spirit. Brenner, on the other hand, can at times sound a little too matter-of-factly. There are moments where you will chuckle in delight reading Waley, but might not do so with Brenner.
Now to Anthony Yu's version. Made in the 1980s, it, too, is a highly commendable piece of work. The first thing one notices about it is its extreme faithfulness to the text - even more so than Brenner's. At times, it even strikes one as being slavish. One must praise his version for being so strictly straightforward, though at times this literalmindedness makes some word choices incomprehensible to English readers. Take his constant rendition of "Wood Mother" for instance, a term which has no meaning whatsoever in English, or "eating rice" for "taking a meal". This is a version especially good if you know your Chinese and would like a crib to read the original with. While maybe not as idiomatic as Brenner, Yu is even more academic and scholarly in that he attempts to translate every character of the language. Faithfulness to the letter of the text takes foremost priority, sometimes over readibility. The success rate is varying, but the translation is on the whole an admirable one.
Comparing the two, both Yu and Brenner can be recommended. Yu would be first choice if fidelity to the text is your priority. If you prefer your English to be more idiomatic and the story to flow better, Brenner should be considered. The two run pretty close and neither is yards ahead of the other. But Waley's translation is still a marvellous read, and even if it is highly abridged, it should under no circumstances be forgotten.