Möchten Sie verkaufen? Hier verkaufen
Jack Kerouac's Duluoz Legend: The Mythic Form of an Autobiographical Fiction
 
Größeres Bild
 
Den Verlag informieren!
Ich möchte dieses Buch auf dem Kindle lesen.

Sie haben keinen Kindle? Hier kaufen oder eine gratis Kindle Lese-App herunterladen.

Jack Kerouac's Duluoz Legend: The Mythic Form of an Autobiographical Fiction [Englisch] [Gebundene Ausgabe]

James T. Jones


Erhältlich bei diesen Anbietern.



Produktinformation


Mehr über den Autor

James T. Jones
Entdecken Sie Bücher, lesen Sie über Autoren und mehr

Besuchen Sie die Seite von James T. Jones auf Amazon

Produktbeschreibungen

Pressestimmen

"[James T. Jones] adds another dimension to the growing body of critical work on Kerouac. As he has accomplished in his very fine study, A Map of Mexico City Blues: Jack Kerouac as Poet, Jones enlarges the reader's understanding of Kerouac by placing his work in a European and American literary context, and creating new critical categories by which to explore the issues at large in Kerouac's oeuvre. By regrouping the Kerouac texts, Jones offers new insights . . . another window into Kerouac's world."—Regina Weinreich, author of The Spontaneous Poetics of Jack Kerouac

Kurzbeschreibung

In the only critical examination of all of Jack Kerouac's published prose, James T. Jones turns to Freud to show how the great Beat writer used the Oedipus myth to shape not only his individual works but also the entire body of his writing.

Like Balzac, Jones explains, Kerouac conceived an overall plan for his total writing corpus, which he called the Duluoz Legend after Jack Duluoz, his fictional alter ego. While Kerouac's work attracts biographical treatment—the ninth full-length biography was published in 1998—Jones takes a Freudian approach to focus on the form of the work. Noting that even casual readers recognize family relationships as the basis for Kerouac's autobiographical prose, Jones discusses these relationships in terms of Freud's notion of the Oedipus complex.

After establishing the basic biographical facts and explaining Freud's application of the Oedipus myth, Jones explicates Kerouac's novels of childhood and adolescence, focusing on sibling rivalry. Supporting his contention that the Beat writer worked according to a plan, Jones then shows how Kerouac revised The Town and the City (1950), his first published novel, in Vanity of Duluoz, the last novel published in his lifetime, to de-emphasize the death of the father. He treats three versions of Kerouac's road novel—including On the Road—as versions of Oedipus's fateful journey from Corinth to Thebes. And he argues that Pic, often considered peripheral to the Duluoz Legend, replicates the Oedipal themes.

Jones demonstrates that Maggie Cassidy, The Subterraneans, and Tristessa share a form that results from Kerouac's unresolved rivalry with his father for the love of his mother. He discusses Kerouac's replacement of the destructive brother figures in On the Road and Visions of Cody with the constructive hero of The Dharma Bums. He also shows how the Oedipal structure of the Duluoz Legend applies to Kerouac's nonfiction.

In the penultimate chapter, Jones explains how Big Sur, Kerouac's story of his alcohol-induced nervous breakdown, actually marks the climax of the Duluoz Legend. The alcoholism, Jones insists, is not the cause but a symptom of a breakdown brought on by his attachment to his mother. He shows how Kerouac's obsession with his family repeats Oedipal themes throughout the Duluoz Legend. Finally, he deals with Oedipal themes in Kerouac's nonnarrative work, including Old Angel Midnight, Some of the Dharma, The Scripture of the Golden Eternity, and several poems.


Tags

 (Was ist das?)
Bei einem Tag handelt es sich um ein Schlagwort, das zum Produkt passt.
Tags erleichtern allen Kunden die Suche und die Sortierung ihrer Lieblingsprodukte.
 

Eine digitale Version dieses Buchs im Kindle-Shop verkaufen

Wenn Sie ein Verleger oder Autor sind und die digitalen Rechte an einem Buch haben, können Sie die digitale Version des Buchs in unserem Kindle-Shop verkaufen. Weitere Informationen

Kundenrezensionen

Es gibt noch keine Kundenrezensionen auf Amazon.de
5 Sterne
4 Sterne
3 Sterne
2 Sterne
1 Sterne
Die hilfreichsten Kundenrezensionen auf Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com:  2 Rezensionen
9 von 11 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
A New Kerouac finally emerges 6. April 2001
Von Ein Kunde - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format:Gebundene Ausgabe
This book is among the first to finally piece together a coherent path in Kerouac studies. Jones's book thoroughly delves into Kerouac's Proustian-like epic approach to the Duluoz legend. It is so refreshing to emerge with fresh ideas apropos Kerouac's technique verses the over zealous biographers and cultural blow-hards who pipe in regularly on the Beats. Much of Kerouac's real life had little to do with Beat ethos, and much more with that of the writer. What the author provides is much more than a run-down of the authobiographical mystique that Kerouac injected into his work, but moreso, the complexity of a narrative that turned American literature on its end. This book deserves much more attention and suffices itself as the most import and vital accomplishment in Kerouac studies to date. It will far outlive much of what has been written about one of America''s most misunderstood novelists.
5 von 7 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
don't be fooled 28. Mai 2005
Von John Clayton - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format:Gebundene Ausgabe
This is one of the worst works of scholarship I have ever read. The book consists mostly of plot summaries, badly written ones at that. Jones needs to re-read (read?) The Elements of Style.

As for the theory--whew! It's awful. Jones attempts to provide a Freudian reading, which would be fine if he'd bothered to understand Freud first. But he didn't. In the Works Cited, he lists only a couple works by Freud, and I believe that's because that's all he read.

Jones shows no understanding of Freud. He seems to argue that Kerouac read about Freud's theory of the Oedipus complex and then consciously tried to organize his novels around that theory. Of course that's ridiculous, but Jones seems to have no clue that the complex operates unconsciously. It's absurd to argue that Kerouac chose to apply it.

It's transparent that Jones doesn't believe the very Freudian theories he (superficially) presents. Generally, he avoids referring to psychoanalysis at all, focusing instead on plot summary and occasionally popping in to point out hostility to a father figure, etc. The theory is NEVER discussed in depth, just referred to in an offhand fashion.

Jones often claims that Kerouac's novels were modelled on the works of other writers, but he offers no support for these claims. He seems to believe that pointing out parallels constitutes evidence.

This writer is in over his depth.

Kunden diskutieren

Das Forum zu diesem Produkt
Diskussion Antworten Jüngster Beitrag
Noch keine Diskussionen

Fragen stellen, Meinungen austauschen, Einblicke gewinnen
Neue Diskussion starten
Thema:
Erster Beitrag:
Eingabe des Log-ins
 


Aktive Diskussionen in ähnlichen Foren
Kundendiskussionen durchsuchen
Alle Amazon-Diskussionen durchsuchen
   
Ähnliche Foren


Lieblingslisten


Ähnliche Artikel finden


Anhand des Sachgebietes nach ähnlichen Produkten suchen:


Ihr Kommentar